Jaroslav Pažout , Milan Němý , Jakub Mikeš , Jan Jirman , Jan Kubr , Eliška Niebauerová , Miroslav Macík , Michal Pech , Michal Štajnrt , Jakub Vaněk , Petr Waldauf , Václav Zvoníček , Lenka Vysloužilová , Robert Babuška , František Duška , VentConnect Study group
{"title":"SmartAlert: Machine learning-based patient-ventilator asynchrony detection system in intensive care units","authors":"Jaroslav Pažout , Milan Němý , Jakub Mikeš , Jan Jirman , Jan Kubr , Eliška Niebauerová , Miroslav Macík , Michal Pech , Michal Štajnrt , Jakub Vaněk , Petr Waldauf , Václav Zvoníček , Lenka Vysloužilová , Robert Babuška , František Duška , VentConnect Study group","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) are associated with ventilator-induced lung injury and increased mortality. Current detection methods rely on static thresholds, extensive preprocessing, or proprietary ventilator data. This study aimed to develop and validate a fully online, real-time system that detects and classifies PVAs directly from ventilator screen data while alerting clinicians based on severity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The SmartAlert system was developed using ventilator screen recordings from ICU patients. It extracts pressure and flow waveforms from video recordings, converts them into time-series data, and employs deep neural networks to classify asynchronies and assign alarm levels from no urgency to most urgent. A dataset of 381,280 double-breath units was independently annotated by two expert intensivists. Two deep learning models were trained: one for alarm prediction and another for asynchrony classification (ineffective triggering, double cycling, high inspiratory effort, no asynchrony). Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC, compared to expert consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SmartAlert demonstrated strong performance for alarm level prediction (overall accuracy: 83.8 %, weighted AUC-ROC: 0.943 [95 % CI: 0.941–0.945]) and PVA classification (weighted accuracy: 89.3 %, weighted AUC-ROC: 0.951 [95 % CI: 0.950–0.953]). It showed high specificity for urgent alarms (99.9 % for level 3) and PVA types (98.5 % for ineffective triggering, 96.9 % for double cycling, 94.8 % for high inspiratory effort).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and internally validated SmartAlert, an automated system that detects PVAs, classifies severity, and alerts clinicians in real time. Its potential to reduce alarm fatigue, optimize ventilator settings, and improve patient outcomes remains to be tested in clinical trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 108927"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016926072500344X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objective
Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) are associated with ventilator-induced lung injury and increased mortality. Current detection methods rely on static thresholds, extensive preprocessing, or proprietary ventilator data. This study aimed to develop and validate a fully online, real-time system that detects and classifies PVAs directly from ventilator screen data while alerting clinicians based on severity.
Methods
The SmartAlert system was developed using ventilator screen recordings from ICU patients. It extracts pressure and flow waveforms from video recordings, converts them into time-series data, and employs deep neural networks to classify asynchronies and assign alarm levels from no urgency to most urgent. A dataset of 381,280 double-breath units was independently annotated by two expert intensivists. Two deep learning models were trained: one for alarm prediction and another for asynchrony classification (ineffective triggering, double cycling, high inspiratory effort, no asynchrony). Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC, compared to expert consensus.
Results
SmartAlert demonstrated strong performance for alarm level prediction (overall accuracy: 83.8 %, weighted AUC-ROC: 0.943 [95 % CI: 0.941–0.945]) and PVA classification (weighted accuracy: 89.3 %, weighted AUC-ROC: 0.951 [95 % CI: 0.950–0.953]). It showed high specificity for urgent alarms (99.9 % for level 3) and PVA types (98.5 % for ineffective triggering, 96.9 % for double cycling, 94.8 % for high inspiratory effort).
Conclusions
We developed and internally validated SmartAlert, an automated system that detects PVAs, classifies severity, and alerts clinicians in real time. Its potential to reduce alarm fatigue, optimize ventilator settings, and improve patient outcomes remains to be tested in clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.