Understanding the constraints to the correct application of tilt derivative operation to a vertical prism in gravity data processing

Oluwatimilehin B. Balogun , Obafemi E. Bilesanmi , Mohamed Metwaly , Oluwatosin F. Akerele , Odunayo T. Ojo , Oluwaseyi A. Dasho
{"title":"Understanding the constraints to the correct application of tilt derivative operation to a vertical prism in gravity data processing","authors":"Oluwatimilehin B. Balogun ,&nbsp;Obafemi E. Bilesanmi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Metwaly ,&nbsp;Oluwatosin F. Akerele ,&nbsp;Odunayo T. Ojo ,&nbsp;Oluwaseyi A. Dasho","doi":"10.1016/j.rines.2025.100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analytical simulation of a buried 3D vertical square prism with known density contrast, depth to the top of the buried body, thickness and cross-section area has been done, and tilt angle derivative enhancement operation has been applied to the data in order to establish the constraints that could impede the correct application of tilt derivative operation on gravity data. From the tilt derivative map generated for the data, the distances between contours “-45° to + 45°” and “-30° to + 30°” were used to estimate the depth to the bottom and top of the prism respectively. Where the depth estimates differ significantly from the depth values used for the simulation, the grid size was varied until estimated depth values that were in good agreement with the simulated depths were gotten. By revealing that estimated depth values from the tilt derivative operation will not be accurate when the simulated depth to the top or bottom of the buried body is too small or large compared with the grid size, the results enshrined the importance of optimum grid size on the accuracy of the result. The optimum grid size for the research was found to be between 6.6 and 10 times the depth of burial. Based on the analytical simulation, the research concluded that depth estimate results obtained from the tilt derivative analysis of gravity data is only accurate when the grid size of data sample is between 6.6 and 10 times the depth of burial of the target. The best result was obtained when the grid size of data sample is about 7.5 times the depth of burial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101084,"journal":{"name":"Results in Earth Sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714825000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical simulation of a buried 3D vertical square prism with known density contrast, depth to the top of the buried body, thickness and cross-section area has been done, and tilt angle derivative enhancement operation has been applied to the data in order to establish the constraints that could impede the correct application of tilt derivative operation on gravity data. From the tilt derivative map generated for the data, the distances between contours “-45° to + 45°” and “-30° to + 30°” were used to estimate the depth to the bottom and top of the prism respectively. Where the depth estimates differ significantly from the depth values used for the simulation, the grid size was varied until estimated depth values that were in good agreement with the simulated depths were gotten. By revealing that estimated depth values from the tilt derivative operation will not be accurate when the simulated depth to the top or bottom of the buried body is too small or large compared with the grid size, the results enshrined the importance of optimum grid size on the accuracy of the result. The optimum grid size for the research was found to be between 6.6 and 10 times the depth of burial. Based on the analytical simulation, the research concluded that depth estimate results obtained from the tilt derivative analysis of gravity data is only accurate when the grid size of data sample is between 6.6 and 10 times the depth of burial of the target. The best result was obtained when the grid size of data sample is about 7.5 times the depth of burial.
在重力数据处理中,倾斜导数操作对垂直棱镜正确应用的限制
对已知密度对比、埋体顶深、厚度和横截面积的埋地三维垂直方形棱镜进行了解析模拟,并对数据进行了倾斜导数增强运算,建立了影响倾斜导数运算在重力数据上正确应用的约束条件。从为数据生成的倾斜导数图中,分别使用“-45°至+ 45°”和“-30°至+ 30°”等高线之间的距离来估计到棱镜底部和顶部的深度。当深度估计值与模拟使用的深度值有明显差异时,改变网格大小,直到得到与模拟深度非常一致的估计深度值。通过揭示当模拟到埋体顶部或底部的深度与网格尺寸相比过小或过大时,倾斜导数操作估计的深度值将不准确,结果表明了最佳网格尺寸对结果精度的重要性。研究发现,网格的最佳尺寸是埋深的6.6到10倍。通过分析仿真,研究得出重力数据倾斜导数分析得到的深度估计结果只有在数据样本网格尺寸为目标埋深的6.6 ~ 10倍时才准确。当数据样本的网格尺寸约为埋深的7.5倍时,得到的结果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信