Louis C. Bender , Mike Reardon , Allen Darrow , James Lucero
{"title":"Movements and Survival of Adult Mule Deer Bucks in a Wildlife Enterprise Trophy Ranching Context","authors":"Louis C. Bender , Mike Reardon , Allen Darrow , James Lucero","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ranch economics are increasingly dependent upon wildlife enterprises throughout the arid Southwestern USA and Mexico, and mule deer (<em>Odocoileus hemionus</em>) are perhaps the most economically important species in the region. Because significant investments by landowners are necessary for trophy management (i.e., high adult sex [buck:doe] ratio, high buck survival, and advanced [older] buck age structure), loss of bucks to adjacent properties and increased mortality on ranches (both a potential consequence of more intense competition among deer under trophy management) could represent significant disincentives to managers. Hence, we evaluated the movements and survival of adult bucks in a ranch context in northeastern New Mexico, USA, to evaluate these concerns. We found that both concerns were warranted, especially for small ranching enterprises. Despite small home ranges (16.0 km<sup>2</sup>) and core areas (4.4 km<sup>2</sup>) due to intensive management for quality deer habitat, deer spent ca. 40% of their time on adjacent properties regardless of season, and half of deer with >50% of their annual ranges on adjacent properties were harvested there. Similarly, low body condition postrut predisposed all age (year)-classes of bucks to nonharvest mortality, likely an unavoidable consequence of trophy management. The most important consideration with respect to off-ranch movements is ranch size; properties < 4× larger than adult buck home ranges in arid Southwestern environments should question if investment in trophy buck production is viable. For ranches lacking intensive deer habitat improvement programs, adult buck home ranges are likely > 20 km<sup>2</sup>, suggesting a size of ≥ 80 km<sup>2</sup> for ranches to ensure that a significant proportion of adult bucks are full-time residents, and hence allow managers to realize returns from trophy management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"102 ","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425000612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ranch economics are increasingly dependent upon wildlife enterprises throughout the arid Southwestern USA and Mexico, and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are perhaps the most economically important species in the region. Because significant investments by landowners are necessary for trophy management (i.e., high adult sex [buck:doe] ratio, high buck survival, and advanced [older] buck age structure), loss of bucks to adjacent properties and increased mortality on ranches (both a potential consequence of more intense competition among deer under trophy management) could represent significant disincentives to managers. Hence, we evaluated the movements and survival of adult bucks in a ranch context in northeastern New Mexico, USA, to evaluate these concerns. We found that both concerns were warranted, especially for small ranching enterprises. Despite small home ranges (16.0 km2) and core areas (4.4 km2) due to intensive management for quality deer habitat, deer spent ca. 40% of their time on adjacent properties regardless of season, and half of deer with >50% of their annual ranges on adjacent properties were harvested there. Similarly, low body condition postrut predisposed all age (year)-classes of bucks to nonharvest mortality, likely an unavoidable consequence of trophy management. The most important consideration with respect to off-ranch movements is ranch size; properties < 4× larger than adult buck home ranges in arid Southwestern environments should question if investment in trophy buck production is viable. For ranches lacking intensive deer habitat improvement programs, adult buck home ranges are likely > 20 km2, suggesting a size of ≥ 80 km2 for ranches to ensure that a significant proportion of adult bucks are full-time residents, and hence allow managers to realize returns from trophy management.
期刊介绍:
Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes.
Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.