Kevin Yau, Joel G. Ray, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Bin Luo, Sheikh Abdullah, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Sara Wing, Kristin K. Clemens, Fabio Castrillon-Ramirez, Jacob A. Udell, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Ann Young, Ziv Harel, Jeffrey Perl, Vikas S. Sridhar, Huajing Ni, Tae Won Yi, Lawrence A. Leiter, Amit X. Garg, David Z.I. Cherney, Ron Wald
{"title":"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease","authors":"Kevin Yau, Joel G. Ray, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Bin Luo, Sheikh Abdullah, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Sara Wing, Kristin K. Clemens, Fabio Castrillon-Ramirez, Jacob A. Udell, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Ann Young, Ziv Harel, Jeffrey Perl, Vikas S. Sridhar, Huajing Ni, Tae Won Yi, Lawrence A. Leiter, Amit X. Garg, David Z.I. Cherney, Ron Wald","doi":"10.2337/dc24-2811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) initiation on emergency department (ED) visits and all-cause hospitalizations across the spectrum of kidney disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based observational cohort study in adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap time model was used for the primary analysis. RESULTS The cohort included 24,576 new users of a GLP-1RA and 23,600 DPP4i new users. GLP1RA initiation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.94; P < 0.0001). This finding was consistent in confirmatory analyses using the Andersen-Gill model and the PWP calendar time model. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA initiation was associated with a reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations compared with new use of a DPP4i.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) initiation on emergency department (ED) visits and all-cause hospitalizations across the spectrum of kidney disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based observational cohort study in adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap time model was used for the primary analysis. RESULTS The cohort included 24,576 new users of a GLP-1RA and 23,600 DPP4i new users. GLP1RA initiation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.94; P < 0.0001). This finding was consistent in confirmatory analyses using the Andersen-Gill model and the PWP calendar time model. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA initiation was associated with a reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations compared with new use of a DPP4i.
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.