"How can I seek a consultation if I don't have a high fever ?": Barriers to Mental Healthcare Access for Women in the Perinatal Period in Rwanda.

Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.17
Providence M Umuziga, Darius Gishoma, Hynie Michaela, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Gerard Nyiringango
{"title":"<i>\"How can I seek a consultation if I don't have a high fever ?\"</i>: Barriers to Mental Healthcare Access for Women in the Perinatal Period in Rwanda.","authors":"Providence M Umuziga, Darius Gishoma, Hynie Michaela, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Gerard Nyiringango","doi":"10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature highlights barriers to mental healthcare access in the perinatal period, but none specific to Rwanda. The unique historical context of the genocide against the Tutsi may present distinct challenges. This study aimed to identify these barriers in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a qualitative interpretive descriptive approach as part of a multimethod investigation. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 31 perinatal women, and 32 individual interviews were conducted with healthcare providers, including community health workers. Data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers were identified at multiple levels. At the individual level, barriers included low literacy about perinatal mental health symptoms, minimizing negative experiences, fear of being stigmatized, ignorance about the availability of mental health services in the perinatal period, and economic challenges. Family and social-cultural barriers included stigmatization of people with mental health problems, minimization of what happened by friends and family, and lack of support from partners and friends. Institutional and structural barriers included limited services, misdiagnosis, heavy workloads, staff unawareness, and lack of training and guidelines for screening and reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified barriers to perinatal mental healthcare at individual, family and social-cultural, institutional and structural levels. Addressing these barriers requires targeted strategies to improve perinatal mental healthcare access across all identified levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":520910,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","volume":"7 2","pages":"302-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Literature highlights barriers to mental healthcare access in the perinatal period, but none specific to Rwanda. The unique historical context of the genocide against the Tutsi may present distinct challenges. This study aimed to identify these barriers in Rwanda.

Methods: This study employed a qualitative interpretive descriptive approach as part of a multimethod investigation. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 31 perinatal women, and 32 individual interviews were conducted with healthcare providers, including community health workers. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Barriers were identified at multiple levels. At the individual level, barriers included low literacy about perinatal mental health symptoms, minimizing negative experiences, fear of being stigmatized, ignorance about the availability of mental health services in the perinatal period, and economic challenges. Family and social-cultural barriers included stigmatization of people with mental health problems, minimization of what happened by friends and family, and lack of support from partners and friends. Institutional and structural barriers included limited services, misdiagnosis, heavy workloads, staff unawareness, and lack of training and guidelines for screening and reporting.

Conclusion: This study identified barriers to perinatal mental healthcare at individual, family and social-cultural, institutional and structural levels. Addressing these barriers requires targeted strategies to improve perinatal mental healthcare access across all identified levels.

“如果我不发高烧,我该如何寻求咨询?”:卢旺达围产期妇女获得精神保健的障碍。
背景:文献强调了围产期获得精神卫生保健的障碍,但没有针对卢旺达。针对图西族的种族灭绝的独特历史背景可能带来不同的挑战。本研究旨在确定卢旺达的这些障碍。方法:本研究采用定性解释描述性方法作为多方法调查的一部分。对31名围产期妇女进行了4次焦点小组讨论,并对包括社区卫生工作者在内的卫生保健提供者进行了32次个人访谈。数据按主题进行分析。结果:发现了多个层次的障碍。在个人层面上,障碍包括对围产期心理健康症状的识字率低、尽量减少负面经历、害怕被污名化、对围产期心理健康服务的可用性一无所知以及经济挑战。家庭和社会文化障碍包括对有精神健康问题的人的污名化、对朋友和家人所发生的事情轻描淡写以及缺乏伴侣和朋友的支持。体制和结构性障碍包括服务有限、误诊、工作量大、工作人员不知情以及缺乏筛查和报告方面的培训和指南。结论:本研究确定了个人、家庭和社会文化、体制和结构层面的围产期心理保健障碍。要解决这些障碍,就需要有针对性的战略,在所有确定的层面改善围产期心理保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信