Optimizing Patient Access to Orphan Medicinal Products: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp13020024
Tomasz Kluszczynski, Bertalan Nemeth, Magdalena Władysiuk, Marcin Czech, Maria Kamusheva, Nicolae Fotin, Sandra Rose, Tomáš Doležal, Rok Hren
{"title":"Optimizing Patient Access to Orphan Medicinal Products: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe.","authors":"Tomasz Kluszczynski, Bertalan Nemeth, Magdalena Władysiuk, Marcin Czech, Maria Kamusheva, Nicolae Fotin, Sandra Rose, Tomáš Doležal, Rok Hren","doi":"10.3390/jmahp13020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) over the past five years, focusing on seven countries: Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. While these jurisdictions have undergone rapid healthcare transformations, significant disparities in OMP access persist compared to Western Europe. This study aimed to address this gap by identifying barriers and enablers to optimize patient access to OMPs in a sustainable and equitable manner. A mixed-methodology approach was utilized, combining systematic literature reviews, in-depth interviews, and advisory board insights. Perspectives were gathered from a wide range of stakeholders, including policymakers, payers, academia, industry associations, and patient advocacy groups. Additionally, the study incorporated data from CEE-specific initiatives to triangulate findings and evaluate barriers, enablers, and best practices in OMP access. The analysis identified sub-optimal OMP access across most CEE countries, marked by prolonged delays and lower reimbursement rates compared to Western Europe, with Slovenia and Czechia as notable exceptions. Key barriers include limited awareness, inadequate health technology assessment (HTA) frameworks, insufficient financing mechanisms, underutilization of novel access schemes, and fragmented patient engagement. Conversely, enablers include the presence of rare disease policies, OMP-specific HTA frameworks, and patient-inclusive decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"13 2","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) over the past five years, focusing on seven countries: Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. While these jurisdictions have undergone rapid healthcare transformations, significant disparities in OMP access persist compared to Western Europe. This study aimed to address this gap by identifying barriers and enablers to optimize patient access to OMPs in a sustainable and equitable manner. A mixed-methodology approach was utilized, combining systematic literature reviews, in-depth interviews, and advisory board insights. Perspectives were gathered from a wide range of stakeholders, including policymakers, payers, academia, industry associations, and patient advocacy groups. Additionally, the study incorporated data from CEE-specific initiatives to triangulate findings and evaluate barriers, enablers, and best practices in OMP access. The analysis identified sub-optimal OMP access across most CEE countries, marked by prolonged delays and lower reimbursement rates compared to Western Europe, with Slovenia and Czechia as notable exceptions. Key barriers include limited awareness, inadequate health technology assessment (HTA) frameworks, insufficient financing mechanisms, underutilization of novel access schemes, and fragmented patient engagement. Conversely, enablers include the presence of rare disease policies, OMP-specific HTA frameworks, and patient-inclusive decision-making processes.

优化患者获得孤儿药品的途径:中欧和东欧的经验教训。
本研究考察了过去五年中东欧患者获得孤儿药的情况,重点关注七个国家:保加利亚、捷克、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚。虽然这些司法管辖区经历了快速的医疗保健转型,但与西欧相比,在获得OMP方面仍然存在显著差异。本研究旨在通过确定障碍和促进因素,以可持续和公平的方式优化患者获得omp的机会,从而解决这一差距。采用了一种混合方法,结合了系统的文献综述、深度访谈和咨询委员会的见解。从政策制定者、支付方、学术界、行业协会和患者倡导团体等广泛的利益攸关方收集了观点。此外,该研究还纳入了来自cee特定计划的数据,以三角测量结果并评估OMP获取的障碍、推动因素和最佳实践。分析发现,大多数中东欧国家的OMP获取情况都不理想,与西欧相比,其特点是延误时间长,报销率较低,斯洛文尼亚和捷克是明显的例外。主要障碍包括认识有限、卫生技术评估框架不足、融资机制不足、新型获取计划利用不足以及患者参与不完整。相反,推动因素包括罕见病政策的存在、omp特定的HTA框架和包容患者的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信