Prevalence of Substance Use Management Practices in Domestic Violence Shelters in Kentucky.

Stephanie H Ratliff, Aaron R Brown, Natalie D Pope
{"title":"Prevalence of Substance Use Management Practices in Domestic Violence Shelters in Kentucky.","authors":"Stephanie H Ratliff, Aaron R Brown, Natalie D Pope","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2524042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intimate partner violence is a pervasive issue in the United States, and survivors frequently experience co-occurring problems such as substance use disorders. Domestic violence shelters play a crucial role in providing safety and support. However, little is known about the extent to which shelters implement substance use management practices. This study examined the utilization of substance use management practices (SUMPs) across Kentucky's domestic violence shelters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In July 2020, an online survey was conducted with executive directors from all 15 agencies operating domestic violence shelters in Kentucky. SUMPs were examined and compared between shelters in rural and urban locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most directors reported routine use of substance use screening tools by their domestic violence programs. Overall, programs implemented a medium level of SUMPs and policies aligned with harm reduction. Urban shelters tended to implement more SUMPs and be more aligned with harm reduction compared to shelters in rural locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participating domestic violence shelters included routinely screen for substance use and implement SUMPs aligned with harm reduction. However, a quarter of programs do not routinely screen for substance use. Some programs, especially those in rural areas, are lacking in their implementation of SUMPs. Shelter staff should inform survivors of available resources, communicate substance-related practices and policies to community partners who may need to refer survivors to shelter, and use emerging evidence to leverage support for funding and resources for survivors. Future participatory research that includes survivor and front-line staff perspectives is needed to drive practice and policy change.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2524042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence is a pervasive issue in the United States, and survivors frequently experience co-occurring problems such as substance use disorders. Domestic violence shelters play a crucial role in providing safety and support. However, little is known about the extent to which shelters implement substance use management practices. This study examined the utilization of substance use management practices (SUMPs) across Kentucky's domestic violence shelters.

Methods: In July 2020, an online survey was conducted with executive directors from all 15 agencies operating domestic violence shelters in Kentucky. SUMPs were examined and compared between shelters in rural and urban locations.

Results: Most directors reported routine use of substance use screening tools by their domestic violence programs. Overall, programs implemented a medium level of SUMPs and policies aligned with harm reduction. Urban shelters tended to implement more SUMPs and be more aligned with harm reduction compared to shelters in rural locations.

Conclusions: Most participating domestic violence shelters included routinely screen for substance use and implement SUMPs aligned with harm reduction. However, a quarter of programs do not routinely screen for substance use. Some programs, especially those in rural areas, are lacking in their implementation of SUMPs. Shelter staff should inform survivors of available resources, communicate substance-related practices and policies to community partners who may need to refer survivors to shelter, and use emerging evidence to leverage support for funding and resources for survivors. Future participatory research that includes survivor and front-line staff perspectives is needed to drive practice and policy change.

肯塔基州家庭暴力庇护所中物质使用管理实践的流行情况。
背景:亲密伴侣暴力在美国是一个普遍存在的问题,幸存者经常经历共同发生的问题,如物质使用障碍。家庭暴力庇护所在提供安全和支持方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,人们对庇护所实施药物使用管理做法的程度知之甚少。这项研究调查了肯塔基州家庭暴力庇护所的物质使用管理实践(SUMPs)的使用情况。方法:2020年7月,对肯塔基州所有15个经营家庭暴力庇护所的机构的执行主任进行了一项在线调查。对农村和城市地区的避难所进行了检查和比较。结果:大多数主任报告了家庭暴力项目中药物使用筛查工具的常规使用情况。总体而言,这些项目实施了中等水平的sump和与减少危害相一致的政策。与农村地区的庇护所相比,城市庇护所往往实施更多的sump,并且更符合减少危害的要求。结论:大多数参与家庭暴力的庇护所包括常规药物使用筛查,并实施与减少伤害相一致的sump。然而,四分之一的项目没有常规筛查药物使用情况。一些项目,特别是在农村地区的项目,缺乏sump的实施。庇护所工作人员应告知幸存者可用的资源,向可能需要将幸存者转介到庇护所的社区合作伙伴传达与物质有关的做法和政策,并利用新出现的证据为幸存者争取资金和资源支持。未来的参与性研究需要包括幸存者和一线工作人员的观点,以推动实践和政策变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信