Stigmas in Epilepsy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.25003
Matheus Henrique Leite E Silva, João Vitor Sabadine Lima, Iza Paula da Silva Lopes, Ana Carolina Valgas da Silva, Isabela Magalhães Lucchi, Gabriela Padovani Oliveira, Luam Anacleto Mandonça Vieira, Guilherme Octávio Martins Bruno, Elisa de Paula França Resende
{"title":"Stigmas in Epilepsy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Matheus Henrique Leite E Silva, João Vitor Sabadine Lima, Iza Paula da Silva Lopes, Ana Carolina Valgas da Silva, Isabela Magalhães Lucchi, Gabriela Padovani Oliveira, Luam Anacleto Mandonça Vieira, Guilherme Octávio Martins Bruno, Elisa de Paula França Resende","doi":"10.14581/jer.25003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has disclosed significant associations between stigma suffered by people living with epilepsy (PWE) and psychiatric conditions, especially major depression. These results have practical implication when coupled with the precise regional-and-local prevalences of stigma in its heterogeneous manifestations among PWE. Here we review current research involving stigma in PWE to assess its prevalence and explore psychopathological associations. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to identify clinical trials objectively evaluating prevalence of any type of stigma, enacted and perceived, in PWE, published from database inception to 31 May 2024. A random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, with 6,072 participants, to obtain the meta-prevalence of stigma among PWE. Subgroup analysis moderated by major continent was delineated. A report was obtained from clinical documentation review and adjoined to the evidence generated. From the 105 records identified, 22 studies were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis revealed an overall stigma prevalence of 35% (29%; 41%), and subgroups, Africa or Asia (mostly); arbitrarily defined after analysis of geographical study distributions; indicated a prevalence of 40% (34%; 46%) and 28% (21%; 37%), respectively. Significant difference was identified (<i>p</i>=0.03). The case reported exemplifies how stigma may impair development, especially in children and adolescents. Stigmas among PWE are prevalent. More than one in three PWE has already experienced some form of stigma and there is potential to undermine quality of life and associate with psychiatric disorders. PWE may benefit from tailored screening and management approaches to decrease stigma burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":"15 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.25003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has disclosed significant associations between stigma suffered by people living with epilepsy (PWE) and psychiatric conditions, especially major depression. These results have practical implication when coupled with the precise regional-and-local prevalences of stigma in its heterogeneous manifestations among PWE. Here we review current research involving stigma in PWE to assess its prevalence and explore psychopathological associations. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to identify clinical trials objectively evaluating prevalence of any type of stigma, enacted and perceived, in PWE, published from database inception to 31 May 2024. A random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, with 6,072 participants, to obtain the meta-prevalence of stigma among PWE. Subgroup analysis moderated by major continent was delineated. A report was obtained from clinical documentation review and adjoined to the evidence generated. From the 105 records identified, 22 studies were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis revealed an overall stigma prevalence of 35% (29%; 41%), and subgroups, Africa or Asia (mostly); arbitrarily defined after analysis of geographical study distributions; indicated a prevalence of 40% (34%; 46%) and 28% (21%; 37%), respectively. Significant difference was identified (p=0.03). The case reported exemplifies how stigma may impair development, especially in children and adolescents. Stigmas among PWE are prevalent. More than one in three PWE has already experienced some form of stigma and there is potential to undermine quality of life and associate with psychiatric disorders. PWE may benefit from tailored screening and management approaches to decrease stigma burden.

癫痫的柱头:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
最近的研究表明,癫痫患者所遭受的耻辱与精神疾病,特别是重度抑郁症之间存在显著关联。这些结果具有实际意义,当与精确的区域和地方患病率的耻辱在其异质表现在PWE。在此,我们回顾了目前关于PWE中病耻感的研究,以评估其患病率并探索精神病理关联。在PubMed和Scopus中进行了系统评价,以确定客观评估PWE中任何类型的病耻感(制定和感知)患病率的临床试验,从数据库建立到2024年5月31日发表。对6072名参与者进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以获得PWE中病耻感的元患病率。亚群分析以主要大陆为主。从临床文献审查中获得一份报告,并与所产生的证据相附。从确定的105份记录中,有22项研究符合纳入条件。荟萃分析显示,总体病耻感患病率为35% (29%;41%),以及非洲或亚洲的亚群(大部分);在分析地理研究分布后任意定义的;表明患病率为40% (34%;46%)和28% (21%;37%),分别为。差异有统计学意义(p=0.03)。报告的病例说明了耻辱如何损害发展,特别是儿童和青少年的发展。PWE的耻辱感很普遍。超过三分之一的PWE已经经历过某种形式的耻辱,并且有可能破坏生活质量并与精神疾病有关。PWE可能受益于量身定制的筛查和管理方法,以减少耻辱负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信