Effects of preoperative binaural beats on the propofol dose for induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yoon Jung Kim, Hyun Woo Choe, Soo Bin Yoon, Hyeonhoon Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Jeong-Hwa Seo
{"title":"Effects of preoperative binaural beats on the propofol dose for induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yoon Jung Kim, Hyun Woo Choe, Soo Bin Yoon, Hyeonhoon Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Jeong-Hwa Seo","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02993-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Brainwave entrainment with low-frequency binaural beats has shown sedative-sparing and anxiolytic effects. We sought to investigate whether the preoperative use of binaural beats could reduce the propofol dose for the induction of general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia in a randomized controlled trial. In the preoperative waiting area, we randomized patients to hear the binaural beats with frequencies of 432 and 431 Hz in the binaural-beats group (N = 34) or silent sound in the control group (N = 35) for 20 min via stereo headphones. For the induction of general anesthesia, we administered 10 mg of propofol every 15 sec until we observed three clinical signs: the loss of response to verbal commands of \"open your eyes\" (primary outcome), loss of eyelash reflex, and a patient state index of ≤ 50. We collected processed frontal electroencephalography data during the intervention and assessed anxiety scores before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The propofol dose for the loss of response to verbal commands was lower in the binaural-beats group than in the control group (mean [standard deviation], 87 [24] mg vs 105 [32] mg; difference in means, -18 mg; 95% confidence interval, -32 to -5; P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the delta (P = 0.63), theta (P = 0.28), alpha (P = 0.24), and beta (P = 0.85) bands of the processed frontal electroencephalograms and the anxiety scores (P = 0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Binaural beats with a frequency of 1 Hz modestly reduced the propofol dose for the induction of general anesthesia, but we observed no significant differences in the processed frontal electroencephalograms and preoperative anxiety levels.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05431881 ); first submitted 9 June 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02993-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Brainwave entrainment with low-frequency binaural beats has shown sedative-sparing and anxiolytic effects. We sought to investigate whether the preoperative use of binaural beats could reduce the propofol dose for the induction of general anesthesia.

Methods: We enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia in a randomized controlled trial. In the preoperative waiting area, we randomized patients to hear the binaural beats with frequencies of 432 and 431 Hz in the binaural-beats group (N = 34) or silent sound in the control group (N = 35) for 20 min via stereo headphones. For the induction of general anesthesia, we administered 10 mg of propofol every 15 sec until we observed three clinical signs: the loss of response to verbal commands of "open your eyes" (primary outcome), loss of eyelash reflex, and a patient state index of ≤ 50. We collected processed frontal electroencephalography data during the intervention and assessed anxiety scores before and after the intervention.

Results: The propofol dose for the loss of response to verbal commands was lower in the binaural-beats group than in the control group (mean [standard deviation], 87 [24] mg vs 105 [32] mg; difference in means, -18 mg; 95% confidence interval, -32 to -5; P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the delta (P = 0.63), theta (P = 0.28), alpha (P = 0.24), and beta (P = 0.85) bands of the processed frontal electroencephalograms and the anxiety scores (P = 0.50).

Conclusion: Binaural beats with a frequency of 1 Hz modestly reduced the propofol dose for the induction of general anesthesia, but we observed no significant differences in the processed frontal electroencephalograms and preoperative anxiety levels.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05431881 ); first submitted 9 June 2022.

术前双耳节拍对异丙酚诱导全身麻醉剂量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:低频双耳搏动脑波夹带具有镇静和抗焦虑作用。我们试图探讨术前使用双耳节拍是否可以减少异丙酚诱导全身麻醉的剂量。方法:我们在一项随机对照试验中招募了全麻下计划择期手术的患者。在术前等候区,我们将患者随机分为双耳节拍组(N = 34)和对照组(N = 35),分别通过立体声耳机听频率为432和431 Hz的双耳节拍20分钟。为了诱导全身麻醉,我们每15秒给药10mg异丙酚,直到我们观察到三个临床症状:对“睁开眼睛”的口头命令失去反应(主要结果),睫毛反射丧失,患者状态指数≤50。我们在干预期间收集处理过的额叶脑电图数据,并评估干预前后的焦虑评分。结果:双耳搏动组对口头命令丧失反应的异丙酚剂量低于对照组(平均[标准差],87 [32]mg vs 105 [32] mg;平均值差-18毫克;95%置信区间为-32 ~ -5;p = 0.009)。经处理的额叶脑电图δ (P = 0.63)、θ (P = 0.28)、α (P = 0.24)、β (P = 0.85)波段及焦虑评分差异均无统计学意义(P = 0.50)。结论:频率为1hz的双耳搏动可适度减少异丙酚诱导全身麻醉的剂量,但我们观察到处理额叶脑电图和术前焦虑水平无显著差异。研究注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05431881);首次提交于2022年6月9日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信