Head Pain Reproduction and Resolution Behavior in Response to Sustained Mobilization of the Upper Cervical Spine: A Case Series.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3340
Damien C Cummins, Lucy C Thomas, Peter G Osmotherly
{"title":"Head Pain Reproduction and Resolution Behavior in Response to Sustained Mobilization of the Upper Cervical Spine: A Case Series.","authors":"Damien C Cummins, Lucy C Thomas, Peter G Osmotherly","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reproduction and resolution of head pain with sustained upper cervical mobilization has been proposed as a diagnostic indicator of Cervicogenic Headache (CGH). However, there has been little focus on describing head pain response during the application of these maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to describe the head pain response during the performance of sustained upper cervical spine mobilization in people with probable CGH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case series of 20 individuals with probable CGH as defined under the International Headache Society criteria, were assessed by one experienced physiotherapist who administered five sustained upper cervical spine mobilization techniques to each participant. Reproduction of head pain during mobilization was noted. At the start, during, and end of each mobilization technique, change in head pain intensity and time taken to achieve head pain resolution was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen of the 20 participants experienced reproduction and resolution of head pain within 90 seconds of sustained upper cervical mobilization. This phenomenon occurred no more frequently with the mobilization of C2 than with C1. Eight patients reported this on the dominant head pain side only, 6 patients experienced this bilaterally. Neck pain was present in 13 of the 20 participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From this case series, it seems that neither the duration (measured in seconds) nor the magnitude of reduction in head pain intensity was markedly different across dominant compared to non-dominant head pain sides or across cervical levels, indicating reproduction and resolution behavior is irregular. The presence of CGH without neck pain is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reproduction and resolution of head pain with sustained upper cervical mobilization has been proposed as a diagnostic indicator of Cervicogenic Headache (CGH). However, there has been little focus on describing head pain response during the application of these maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to describe the head pain response during the performance of sustained upper cervical spine mobilization in people with probable CGH.

Methods: In this case series of 20 individuals with probable CGH as defined under the International Headache Society criteria, were assessed by one experienced physiotherapist who administered five sustained upper cervical spine mobilization techniques to each participant. Reproduction of head pain during mobilization was noted. At the start, during, and end of each mobilization technique, change in head pain intensity and time taken to achieve head pain resolution was recorded.

Results: Sixteen of the 20 participants experienced reproduction and resolution of head pain within 90 seconds of sustained upper cervical mobilization. This phenomenon occurred no more frequently with the mobilization of C2 than with C1. Eight patients reported this on the dominant head pain side only, 6 patients experienced this bilaterally. Neck pain was present in 13 of the 20 participants.

Conclusion: From this case series, it seems that neither the duration (measured in seconds) nor the magnitude of reduction in head pain intensity was markedly different across dominant compared to non-dominant head pain sides or across cervical levels, indicating reproduction and resolution behavior is irregular. The presence of CGH without neck pain is possible.

持续活动上颈椎后的头痛再现和消退行为:一个病例系列。
背景:持续上颈椎活动引起的头痛的再现和消退已被提出作为宫颈源性头痛(CGH)的诊断指标。然而,在这些动作的应用过程中,对描述头痛反应的关注很少。本研究的目的是描述可能患有CGH的人在持续的上颈椎活动时的头痛反应。方法:根据国际头痛协会的标准,本研究纳入了20例可能患有CGH的患者,由一位经验丰富的物理治疗师对每位患者进行了5种持续的上颈椎活动技术的评估。注意到在活动期间头部疼痛的再现。在每次活动技术的开始、过程和结束时,记录头部疼痛强度的变化和实现头痛缓解所需的时间。结果:20名参与者中的16名在持续的上颈椎活动90秒内经历了头部疼痛的再现和解决。这种现象在C2的动员中并不比在C1的动员中更频繁地发生。8例患者仅报告主侧头痛,6例患者双侧疼痛。20名参与者中有13人出现颈部疼痛。结论:从这个病例系列来看,无论是持续时间(以秒为单位)还是头部疼痛强度的减轻程度,在优势侧与非优势侧或颈椎水平之间似乎都没有显著差异,这表明生殖和消退行为是不规则的。存在CGH而没有颈部疼痛是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信