Components of frontal assessment battery and clinical features in patients with stroke.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Katsuya Sakai, Yuichiro Hosoi, Yusuke Harada, Yuichi Kato, Takayuki Miyauchi
{"title":"Components of frontal assessment battery and clinical features in patients with stroke.","authors":"Katsuya Sakai, Yuichiro Hosoi, Yusuke Harada, Yuichi Kato, Takayuki Miyauchi","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.43270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to investigate whether the 6 aspects of executive functions assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery have different components and, if so, to extract those components using principal component analysis. Second, to identify patient groups based on their characteristics using cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Seventy-eight patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Frontal Assessment Battery, Mini-Mental State Examination, Trail Making Test, and Stroop Color Word Test were performed within 5 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on principal component analysis, the Frontal Assessment Battery was classified into cognitive control (subscales 1-3, 5) and behavioural control (subscales 4 and 6). Two clusters that reflect these components (cluster 1, n = 68; cluster 2, n = 10) were identified. The between-group comparison showed that compared with cluster 1, cluster 2 had lower scores on Frontal Assessment Battery subscales 4 and 6, the Frontal Assessment Battery total scores, and other executive functions scores. The Mini-Mental State Examination scores had no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Frontal Assessment Battery can be classified into 2 components, and the impairment of Frontal Assessment Battery subscales 4 and 6 identified a specific group of patients with stroke with severe executive dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm43270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.43270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: First, to investigate whether the 6 aspects of executive functions assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery have different components and, if so, to extract those components using principal component analysis. Second, to identify patient groups based on their characteristics using cluster analysis.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Seventy-eight patients with stroke.

Methods: The Frontal Assessment Battery, Mini-Mental State Examination, Trail Making Test, and Stroop Color Word Test were performed within 5 days.

Results: Based on principal component analysis, the Frontal Assessment Battery was classified into cognitive control (subscales 1-3, 5) and behavioural control (subscales 4 and 6). Two clusters that reflect these components (cluster 1, n = 68; cluster 2, n = 10) were identified. The between-group comparison showed that compared with cluster 1, cluster 2 had lower scores on Frontal Assessment Battery subscales 4 and 6, the Frontal Assessment Battery total scores, and other executive functions scores. The Mini-Mental State Examination scores had no significant differences.

Conclusions: The Frontal Assessment Battery can be classified into 2 components, and the impairment of Frontal Assessment Battery subscales 4 and 6 identified a specific group of patients with stroke with severe executive dysfunction.

脑卒中患者额叶评估单元的组成及临床特征。
目的:首先,研究正面评估组评估的执行功能的6个方面是否存在不同的成分,如果存在,使用主成分分析提取这些成分。其次,利用聚类分析方法,根据患者的特征进行分组。设计:横断面研究。研究对象:78例中风患者。方法:在5天内进行正面评估组、迷你精神状态测验、轨迹测验和Stroop颜色单词测验。结果:基于主成分分析,正面评估单元可分为认知控制(子量表1- 3,5)和行为控制(子量表4和6)。反映这些成分的两个集群(集群1,n = 68;聚类2,n = 10)。组间比较显示,与第1组相比,第2组在正面评估量表4和6、正面评估量表总分和其他执行功能得分上得分较低。简易精神状态考试成绩无显著差异。结论:额叶功能评估量表可分为2个部分,额叶功能评估量表4和6的功能障碍可识别出有严重执行功能障碍的脑卒中患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信