Development and Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Symptom Management and Self-Care in Patients With Cardiac Surgery.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Rabia Sağlam Aksüt, Cantürk Çapık, Tuğçe Bozkurt Elmas
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Symptom Management and Self-Care in Patients With Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Rabia Sağlam Aksüt, Cantürk Çapık, Tuğçe Bozkurt Elmas","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Evaluating self-efficacy for symptom management and self-care is crucial for ensuring follow-up care after cardiac surgery. As there is not yet a validated measurement tool for this evaluation, the aim of this study was to develop the Self-Efficacy Scale for Symptom Management and Self-Care (SESMSC: Cardiac Surgery) in patients with cardiac surgery and to examine its psychometric properties. <b>Methods:</b> The Symptom Management Theory and Bandura's Self-Efficacy Theory were used as the theoretical background for scale development. A multiphase design was utilized. The initial development phase consisted of item generation and expert panel review. The second phase comprised a three-step validation process: (a) face and content validity analysis, (b) exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity, and (c) Cronbach's α, test-retest, and item-total correlation analysis to assess internal consistency reliability. The sample (<i>n</i> = 401) was randomly divided into two subsamples for EFA and CFA (EFA group: <i>n</i> = 201; CFA group: <i>n</i> = 200). <b>Results:</b> EFA suggested a 20-item, two-factor structure with factor loadings of .342-0.782. The two subscales of the scale were labeled symptom management self-efficacy and self-efficacy for self-care activities. Goodness-of-fit indices indicated a good model fit. Cronbach's α, test-retest, and item-total correlation results demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> The SESMSC: Cardiac Surgery may be a useful tool to evaluate self-efficacy for symptom management and self-care after cardiac surgery. Further evaluation in independent samples is needed to investigate its psychometric properties and usefulness in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Evaluating self-efficacy for symptom management and self-care is crucial for ensuring follow-up care after cardiac surgery. As there is not yet a validated measurement tool for this evaluation, the aim of this study was to develop the Self-Efficacy Scale for Symptom Management and Self-Care (SESMSC: Cardiac Surgery) in patients with cardiac surgery and to examine its psychometric properties. Methods: The Symptom Management Theory and Bandura's Self-Efficacy Theory were used as the theoretical background for scale development. A multiphase design was utilized. The initial development phase consisted of item generation and expert panel review. The second phase comprised a three-step validation process: (a) face and content validity analysis, (b) exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity, and (c) Cronbach's α, test-retest, and item-total correlation analysis to assess internal consistency reliability. The sample (n = 401) was randomly divided into two subsamples for EFA and CFA (EFA group: n = 201; CFA group: n = 200). Results: EFA suggested a 20-item, two-factor structure with factor loadings of .342-0.782. The two subscales of the scale were labeled symptom management self-efficacy and self-efficacy for self-care activities. Goodness-of-fit indices indicated a good model fit. Cronbach's α, test-retest, and item-total correlation results demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability. Implications for Practice: The SESMSC: Cardiac Surgery may be a useful tool to evaluate self-efficacy for symptom management and self-care after cardiac surgery. Further evaluation in independent samples is needed to investigate its psychometric properties and usefulness in clinical practice.

心脏手术患者症状管理和自我护理自我效能感量表的编制及其心理测量学特征。
背景与目的:评估自我效能感对心脏手术后症状管理和自我护理至关重要。由于目前还没有一个有效的测量工具来进行这项评估,本研究的目的是开发心脏手术患者症状管理和自我护理自我效能量表(SESMSC:心脏手术),并检查其心理测量学特性。方法:以症状管理理论和班杜拉自我效能理论为理论背景,编制量表。采用多相设计。最初的开发阶段包括项目生成和专家小组审查。第二阶段包括三步验证过程:(a)面孔和内容效度分析,(b)探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)用于结构效度分析,以及(c) Cronbach's α、测试-重测和项目-总量相关分析以评估内部一致性信度。样本(n = 401)随机分为EFA和CFA两个亚样本(EFA组:n = 201;CFA组:n = 200)。结果:EFA呈20项双因子结构,因子负荷为0.342 ~ 0.782。量表的两个分量表分别为症状管理自我效能感和自我护理活动自我效能感。拟合优度指数表明模型拟合良好。Cronbach’s α、test-retest和item-total相关结果显示了可接受的内部一致性信度。实践意义:SESMSC:心脏手术可能是评估心脏手术后症状管理和自我护理的自我效能感的有用工具。需要在独立样本中进一步评估其心理测量特性和在临床实践中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信