Identifying barriers and facilitators to participation in cancer screening among Irish travellers, a minority ethnic group in Ireland, using a codesigned approach.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patricia Fitzpatrick, Aela O'Flynn, Reuel Jalal, Kate Frazer, Lynsey Kavanagh, Mary B Collins, Una Kennedy, Triona McCarthy, Maria McEnery, Aine Lyng, Regina Joye, Brigid Quirke, Patricia Fox
{"title":"Identifying barriers and facilitators to participation in cancer screening among Irish travellers, a minority ethnic group in Ireland, using a codesigned approach.","authors":"Patricia Fitzpatrick, Aela O'Flynn, Reuel Jalal, Kate Frazer, Lynsey Kavanagh, Mary B Collins, Una Kennedy, Triona McCarthy, Maria McEnery, Aine Lyng, Regina Joye, Brigid Quirke, Patricia Fox","doi":"10.1177/09691413251352402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis study sought to determine participation by eligible Irish Travellers, a minority ethnic group, in the cancer screening programmes in Ireland (bowel, breast and cervical screening) and to determine barriers/facilitators to screening.MethodologyThis study was co-designed with the National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) and Pavee Point Traveller and Roma Centre, Ireland. A survey questionnaire, adapted from the NCCP's 2022 National Survey on Cancer Awareness, was disseminated to Travellers via Traveller Community Health Workers (TCHWs).ResultsA total of 574 survey questionnaires were distributed across 12 different Primary Health Care Traveller Projects in the Republic of Ireland and 483 (84%) were returned completed; 148 (30.6%) were from men and 306 (63.1%) from women (6.3%, missing data). High proportions had ever attended breast (72.6%) and cervical (65.4%) screening. Bowel screening uptake was low in both men (12.5%) and women (19.2%). Low proportions recalled receiving an invitation to programmes. The faecal immunochemical test test used in the BowelScreen programme prompted embarrassment as a barrier in eligible men (62.5%); embarrassment was lower in women for bowel (38.5%), breast (32.9%) and cervical (30.4%) screening. Fear was the second highest barrier. The main facilitators of screening attendance were talking to TCHW and an invitation respectively, particularly in women eligible for bowel (50%; 53.8%), breast (49.3%; 50.7%) and cervical screening (47.6%; 48.2%), but lower in men (25%; 37.5%); 25% cited the family doctor as facilitator.ConclusionTravellers face barriers accessing mainstream health services; easy access to screening must be ensured<b>.</b> The TCHW is a key facilitator. There is a need for universal ethnic identifiers to facilitate routine monitoring of participation and outcomes for Travellers in screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251352402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251352402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThis study sought to determine participation by eligible Irish Travellers, a minority ethnic group, in the cancer screening programmes in Ireland (bowel, breast and cervical screening) and to determine barriers/facilitators to screening.MethodologyThis study was co-designed with the National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) and Pavee Point Traveller and Roma Centre, Ireland. A survey questionnaire, adapted from the NCCP's 2022 National Survey on Cancer Awareness, was disseminated to Travellers via Traveller Community Health Workers (TCHWs).ResultsA total of 574 survey questionnaires were distributed across 12 different Primary Health Care Traveller Projects in the Republic of Ireland and 483 (84%) were returned completed; 148 (30.6%) were from men and 306 (63.1%) from women (6.3%, missing data). High proportions had ever attended breast (72.6%) and cervical (65.4%) screening. Bowel screening uptake was low in both men (12.5%) and women (19.2%). Low proportions recalled receiving an invitation to programmes. The faecal immunochemical test test used in the BowelScreen programme prompted embarrassment as a barrier in eligible men (62.5%); embarrassment was lower in women for bowel (38.5%), breast (32.9%) and cervical (30.4%) screening. Fear was the second highest barrier. The main facilitators of screening attendance were talking to TCHW and an invitation respectively, particularly in women eligible for bowel (50%; 53.8%), breast (49.3%; 50.7%) and cervical screening (47.6%; 48.2%), but lower in men (25%; 37.5%); 25% cited the family doctor as facilitator.ConclusionTravellers face barriers accessing mainstream health services; easy access to screening must be ensured. The TCHW is a key facilitator. There is a need for universal ethnic identifiers to facilitate routine monitoring of participation and outcomes for Travellers in screening.

使用共同设计的方法,确定爱尔兰少数民族爱尔兰旅行者参与癌症筛查的障碍和促进因素。
本研究旨在确定符合条件的爱尔兰旅行者(一个少数民族群体)在爱尔兰癌症筛查计划(肠、乳腺和宫颈筛查)中的参与情况,并确定筛查的障碍/促进因素。本研究是与国家癌症控制规划(NCCP)和爱尔兰Pavee Point Traveller和Roma中心共同设计的。根据NCCP的2022年全国癌症意识调查,通过游民社区卫生工作者(TCHWs)向游民散发了一份调查问卷。结果在爱尔兰共和国12个不同的初级卫生保健游民项目中共发放了574份调查问卷,其中483份(84%)已完成;148例(30.6%)来自男性,306例(63.1%)来自女性(6.3%,缺失数据)。曾经参加过乳腺(72.6%)和宫颈(65.4%)筛查的比例很高。男性(12.5%)和女性(19.2%)的肠道筛查吸收率均较低。很少的人记得收到了参加方案的邀请。在BowelScreen项目中使用的粪便免疫化学试验(62.5%)使符合条件的男性感到尴尬;女性在肠(38.5%)、乳腺(32.9%)和宫颈(30.4%)筛查时的尴尬程度较低。恐惧是第二高的障碍。参加筛查的主要促进者分别是与TCHW交谈和邀请,特别是在符合肠检查条件的女性中(50%;53.8%),乳房(49.3%);50.7%)和子宫颈普查(47.6%;48.2%),但男性较低(25%;37.5%);25%的人认为家庭医生是推动者。结论:旅行者在获得主流卫生服务方面存在障碍;必须确保方便地进行筛选。TCHW是一个关键的推动者。需要通用的种族标识符,以促进对旅行者参与筛查的情况和结果的常规监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信