Implementation matters: program impact pathway analysis of four sectoral nutrition-sensitive interventions in Anambra and Kebbi states, Nigeria.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2519677
Oluchi Ezekannagha, Scott Drimie, Dieter Von Fintel, Busie Maziya-Dixon, Xikombiso Mbhenyane
{"title":"Implementation matters: program impact pathway analysis of four sectoral nutrition-sensitive interventions in Anambra and Kebbi states, Nigeria.","authors":"Oluchi Ezekannagha, Scott Drimie, Dieter Von Fintel, Busie Maziya-Dixon, Xikombiso Mbhenyane","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2519677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Undernutrition in early childhood can be reduced when large-scale, nutrition-sensitive programs are delivered with adequate dose, reach, fidelity, and recruitment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study (i) investigates the implementation and impact pathways of four nutrition-sensitive programs in Kebbi and Anambra states, Nigeria: Early Childhood Development Education (ECCDE), Environmental Sanitation, Skills Acquisition, and Agricultural Transformation Support Program (ATASP-1) and (ii) identifies cross-sector factors that enable or hinder effective dose, reach, fidelity, and recruitment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employs qualitative methods such as document reviews, in-depth interviews, and site observations to explore the complexity of program delivery and the contextual factors that influence its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four programs showed dose-reach-fidelity-recruitment gaps in varying degrees: irregular training and equipment delayed dose; rural and low-income communities were least reached; weak quality control cut fidelity; and recruitment seldom penetrated remote areas. Barriers across sectors included insufficient infrastructure, shortages of trained personnel, and bureaucratic funding delays. Programs with robust community engagement, active multi-stakeholder collaboration, timely resource flow, and short 'reviewandadapt' cycles (ATASP1 in both states; ECCDE in Anambra) overcame many shortfalls, whereas those lacking these features underperformed (Environmental Sanitation in Anambra; Skills Acquisition in Kebbi).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closing Nigeria's nutrition-sensitive implementation gap demands a dual response: fix tangible barriers - staffing, infrastructure, and procurement - and institutionalize community-led planning and adaptive management to keep dose-reach-fidelity-recruitment on track. Doing so will improve program reach and quality and accelerate progress against child undernutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2519677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2519677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Undernutrition in early childhood can be reduced when large-scale, nutrition-sensitive programs are delivered with adequate dose, reach, fidelity, and recruitment.

Objectives: This study (i) investigates the implementation and impact pathways of four nutrition-sensitive programs in Kebbi and Anambra states, Nigeria: Early Childhood Development Education (ECCDE), Environmental Sanitation, Skills Acquisition, and Agricultural Transformation Support Program (ATASP-1) and (ii) identifies cross-sector factors that enable or hinder effective dose, reach, fidelity, and recruitment.

Methods: The study employs qualitative methods such as document reviews, in-depth interviews, and site observations to explore the complexity of program delivery and the contextual factors that influence its outcomes.

Results: All four programs showed dose-reach-fidelity-recruitment gaps in varying degrees: irregular training and equipment delayed dose; rural and low-income communities were least reached; weak quality control cut fidelity; and recruitment seldom penetrated remote areas. Barriers across sectors included insufficient infrastructure, shortages of trained personnel, and bureaucratic funding delays. Programs with robust community engagement, active multi-stakeholder collaboration, timely resource flow, and short 'reviewandadapt' cycles (ATASP1 in both states; ECCDE in Anambra) overcame many shortfalls, whereas those lacking these features underperformed (Environmental Sanitation in Anambra; Skills Acquisition in Kebbi).

Conclusion: Closing Nigeria's nutrition-sensitive implementation gap demands a dual response: fix tangible barriers - staffing, infrastructure, and procurement - and institutionalize community-led planning and adaptive management to keep dose-reach-fidelity-recruitment on track. Doing so will improve program reach and quality and accelerate progress against child undernutrition.

实施事项:对尼日利亚阿南布拉州和凯比州四个部门营养敏感型干预措施的方案影响路径分析。
背景:如果大规模的、对营养敏感的计划能够提供足够的剂量、覆盖面、保真度和招募,就可以减少幼儿期营养不良。目的:本研究(1)调查尼日利亚凯比州和阿南布拉州四个营养敏感项目的实施和影响途径:儿童早期发展教育(ECCDE)、环境卫生、技能获取和农业转型支持项目(ATASP-1);(2)确定促进或阻碍有效剂量、覆盖范围、保真度和招募的跨部门因素。方法:本研究采用定性方法,如文献综述、深度访谈和现场观察,以探索项目交付的复杂性和影响其结果的背景因素。结果:4个项目均存在不同程度的剂量达到保真度缺口:培训不规范、设备剂量延迟;农村和低收入社区的覆盖率最低;质量控制薄弱,降低保真度;招募人员很少渗透到偏远地区。跨部门的障碍包括基础设施不足、训练有素的人员短缺以及官僚主义的资金拖延。两州的项目都具有强大的社区参与、积极的多方利益相关者合作、及时的资源流动和较短的“审查和适应”周期(ATASP1);在阿南布拉的ecde克服了许多不足,而那些缺乏这些特征的人表现不佳(阿南布拉的环境卫生;技能获取(Kebbi)。结论:弥合尼日利亚对营养敏感的实施差距需要采取双重应对措施:消除人员配备、基础设施和采购等有形障碍,并使社区主导的规划和适应性管理制度化,以确保剂量达到保真度的招聘工作步入正轨。这样做将提高规划的覆盖面和质量,并加快消除儿童营养不良的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信