Torben Brod, Uta Hillebrand, Christoph Schröder, Andreas Flemming, Nils Schneider, Tanja Schleef
{"title":"[Predictability of patient disposition from emergency medical services triage categories: exploratory analysis of routine data].","authors":"Torben Brod, Uta Hillebrand, Christoph Schröder, Andreas Flemming, Nils Schneider, Tanja Schleef","doi":"10.1007/s00063-025-01300-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efficient and patient-centered emergency care requires early control of patient flow. It is unclear whether this is already possible in the prehospital phase by emergency medical services (EMS) and whether this can contribute to relieving pressure on emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the correlation between prehospital triage categories by EMS personnel and patient admission/discharge after treatment in the ED, and to assess the use of hospital resources for patients who remained outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of routine preclinical and clinical data from all patients presenting to the ED of a university hospital by EMS over a 2-week period. Analyses were performed descriptively and using the Mann-Whitney U test and the χ<sup>2</sup> test. Positive and negative predictive values were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the observation period, 570 EMS patients were seen in the ED, of whom 307 (53.9%) remained as outpatients. For 309 (54.2%) of the patients, the triage category assigned by the EMS corresponded to the type of subsequent care (outpatient/inpatient); in 249 cases (43.7%) the need for inpatient care was overestimated. In addition, 262 patients (85.3%) received at least one diagnostic or therapeutic resource prior to discharge, the most common being X‑rays (118/38.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In only about half of the cases was the EMS personnel's prognosis consistent with the subsequent decision to admit or discharge the patient from the ED. Patients who remained as outpatients tended to require further diagnostic and therapeutic resources. Therefore, direct transfer of EMS patients to alternative care structures seems risky in the current environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-025-01300-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Efficient and patient-centered emergency care requires early control of patient flow. It is unclear whether this is already possible in the prehospital phase by emergency medical services (EMS) and whether this can contribute to relieving pressure on emergency departments (EDs).
Objectives: To examine the correlation between prehospital triage categories by EMS personnel and patient admission/discharge after treatment in the ED, and to assess the use of hospital resources for patients who remained outpatients.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of routine preclinical and clinical data from all patients presenting to the ED of a university hospital by EMS over a 2-week period. Analyses were performed descriptively and using the Mann-Whitney U test and the χ2 test. Positive and negative predictive values were also calculated.
Results: During the observation period, 570 EMS patients were seen in the ED, of whom 307 (53.9%) remained as outpatients. For 309 (54.2%) of the patients, the triage category assigned by the EMS corresponded to the type of subsequent care (outpatient/inpatient); in 249 cases (43.7%) the need for inpatient care was overestimated. In addition, 262 patients (85.3%) received at least one diagnostic or therapeutic resource prior to discharge, the most common being X‑rays (118/38.4%).
Conclusion: In only about half of the cases was the EMS personnel's prognosis consistent with the subsequent decision to admit or discharge the patient from the ED. Patients who remained as outpatients tended to require further diagnostic and therapeutic resources. Therefore, direct transfer of EMS patients to alternative care structures seems risky in the current environment.
期刊介绍:
Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine.
Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.