Dynamic expectancies: The independent role of within-person change in outcome expectancy in predicting overall treatment outcomes in psychotherapy for depression.

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Liron Rozenkrantz, Oleksandr Laskorunskyi, Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Itai Dattner
{"title":"Dynamic expectancies: The independent role of within-person change in outcome expectancy in predicting overall treatment outcomes in psychotherapy for depression.","authors":"Liron Rozenkrantz, Oleksandr Laskorunskyi, Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Itai Dattner","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2519574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dynamic changes in patients' outcome expectancy have been increasingly recognized as important for psychotherapy success. However, whether expectancy change predicts treatment outcomes independently of baseline expectancy, particularly in major depressive disorder (MDD), remains underexplored. This study investigated the role of expectancy change throughout treatment as an independent predictor of psychotherapy outcomes in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five patients with MDD underwent a 16-session psychotherapy treatment, during which expectancy was measured six times. Expectancy change was operationalized as the within-person slope of expectancy across sessions, while baseline expectancy was assessed prior to treatment onset. Linear regressions examined the contribution of baseline expectancy, expectancy change and their interaction to overall symptom improvement, from pre- to post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater increase in expectancy throughout treatment predicted faster and more substantial recovery. Notably, both higher baseline expectancy and greater expectancy change independently predicted better treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight that dynamic changes in patients' outcome expectancy predict overall symptom improvement, independently of baseline expectancy. Integrating these findings within a broader framework of belief-updating in depression, we propose that expectancy change may inform treatment progression and serve as a therapeutic target. Implications for clinical practice and future work are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2519574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dynamic changes in patients' outcome expectancy have been increasingly recognized as important for psychotherapy success. However, whether expectancy change predicts treatment outcomes independently of baseline expectancy, particularly in major depressive disorder (MDD), remains underexplored. This study investigated the role of expectancy change throughout treatment as an independent predictor of psychotherapy outcomes in MDD.

Methods: Seventy-five patients with MDD underwent a 16-session psychotherapy treatment, during which expectancy was measured six times. Expectancy change was operationalized as the within-person slope of expectancy across sessions, while baseline expectancy was assessed prior to treatment onset. Linear regressions examined the contribution of baseline expectancy, expectancy change and their interaction to overall symptom improvement, from pre- to post-treatment.

Results: A greater increase in expectancy throughout treatment predicted faster and more substantial recovery. Notably, both higher baseline expectancy and greater expectancy change independently predicted better treatment outcomes.

Conclusions: These findings highlight that dynamic changes in patients' outcome expectancy predict overall symptom improvement, independently of baseline expectancy. Integrating these findings within a broader framework of belief-updating in depression, we propose that expectancy change may inform treatment progression and serve as a therapeutic target. Implications for clinical practice and future work are discussed.

动态期望:在预测抑郁症心理治疗的总体治疗结果中,预期结果的个人内部变化的独立作用。
目的:患者预期结果的动态变化越来越被认为是心理治疗成功的重要因素。然而,期望变化是否独立于基线期望预测治疗结果,特别是在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,仍未得到充分研究。本研究调查了期望变化在治疗过程中作为重度抑郁症心理治疗结果的独立预测因子的作用。方法:75例重度抑郁症患者接受了16个疗程的心理治疗,在此期间测量了6次预期。期望变化被操作为跨疗程的个人期望斜率,而基线期望在治疗开始前被评估。线性回归检验了基线期望、期望变化及其相互作用对治疗前后整体症状改善的贡献。结果:在整个治疗过程中期望值的增加预示着更快和更实质性的恢复。值得注意的是,更高的基线期望和更大的期望变化都独立预测了更好的治疗结果。结论:这些发现强调,患者预后预期的动态变化预测了整体症状的改善,独立于基线预期。将这些发现整合到更广泛的抑郁症信念更新框架中,我们提出期望变化可能会通知治疗进展并作为治疗目标。对临床实践和未来工作的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信