Determinants of vegetable food choice in families with limited food budgets in England: a focus group study to inform vegetable promotion programmes.

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Nutritional Science Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/jns.2025.10016
Carol A Williams, Martina Gregori, Nigel Sherriff
{"title":"Determinants of vegetable food choice in families with limited food budgets in England: a focus group study to inform vegetable promotion programmes.","authors":"Carol A Williams, Martina Gregori, Nigel Sherriff","doi":"10.1017/jns.2025.10016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vegetable consumption in many countries is less than recommended and even lower in low-income households. This study explored the determinants of current vegetable food choice in households with limited food budgets to inform the implementation of a national vegetable promotion programme. Five focus groups and one individual interview were conducted with twenty-nine parents who self-identified as 'shopping on a budget' in an area of multiple deprivation in the southeast of England. Transcripts of audio recordings were coded in NVivo and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Four main themes which shaped the range of vegetables brought into the home were identified: (1) attributes of vegetables, (2) attributes of parents including their vegetable norms, knowledge and skills (veg-literacy), and interest and opportunity to invest time and effort in vegetables, (3) family food dynamics, and (4) influence of retailers. Overarching this was parents' capacity to absorb the risk of wasting food, money, time, and effort on vegetables and damaging trust in the parent-child food relationship. The data suggest there is a common set of 'core vegetables', which are routinely bought. When money is tight, parents only buy vegetables they know their children will eat and are generally not persuaded to buy 'off-list' in response to price discounts or promotions. Cost is not always the main barrier to increased vegetable purchase. To avoid unintentionally widening dietary inequalities, supply-side interventions to promote vegetable consumption need to be designed alongside targeted actions that enhance the capacity of low-income households to respond.</p>","PeriodicalId":47536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutritional Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"e42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutritional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2025.10016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetable consumption in many countries is less than recommended and even lower in low-income households. This study explored the determinants of current vegetable food choice in households with limited food budgets to inform the implementation of a national vegetable promotion programme. Five focus groups and one individual interview were conducted with twenty-nine parents who self-identified as 'shopping on a budget' in an area of multiple deprivation in the southeast of England. Transcripts of audio recordings were coded in NVivo and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Four main themes which shaped the range of vegetables brought into the home were identified: (1) attributes of vegetables, (2) attributes of parents including their vegetable norms, knowledge and skills (veg-literacy), and interest and opportunity to invest time and effort in vegetables, (3) family food dynamics, and (4) influence of retailers. Overarching this was parents' capacity to absorb the risk of wasting food, money, time, and effort on vegetables and damaging trust in the parent-child food relationship. The data suggest there is a common set of 'core vegetables', which are routinely bought. When money is tight, parents only buy vegetables they know their children will eat and are generally not persuaded to buy 'off-list' in response to price discounts or promotions. Cost is not always the main barrier to increased vegetable purchase. To avoid unintentionally widening dietary inequalities, supply-side interventions to promote vegetable consumption need to be designed alongside targeted actions that enhance the capacity of low-income households to respond.

英国食品预算有限的家庭中蔬菜食品选择的决定因素:一项为蔬菜推广计划提供信息的焦点小组研究。
许多国家的蔬菜消费量低于建议水平,低收入家庭的蔬菜消费量甚至更低。本研究探讨了食品预算有限的家庭目前选择蔬菜食品的决定因素,以便为国家蔬菜推广方案的实施提供信息。在英格兰东南部的一个多重贫困地区,研究人员对29名父母进行了五个焦点小组和一次个人访谈,这些父母认为自己是“按预算购物”。录音文本在NVivo中编码,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。确定了四个主要主题,形成了带入家庭的蔬菜的范围:(1)蔬菜的属性,(2)父母的属性,包括他们的蔬菜规范,知识和技能(蔬菜素养),以及在蔬菜上投入时间和精力的兴趣和机会,(3)家庭食物动态,(4)零售商的影响。最重要的是,父母有能力承担在蔬菜上浪费食物、金钱、时间和精力的风险,并破坏亲子食物关系中的信任。数据表明,有一组常见的“核心蔬菜”,它们是人们经常购买的。当资金紧张时,父母只买他们知道孩子会吃的蔬菜,通常不会因为价格折扣或促销而被说服购买“非清单”蔬菜。成本并不总是增加蔬菜购买量的主要障碍。为了避免在无意中扩大饮食不平等,需要在设计促进蔬菜消费的供应方干预措施的同时,采取有针对性的行动,提高低收入家庭的应对能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutritional Science
Journal of Nutritional Science NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nutritional Science is an international, peer-reviewed, online only, open access journal that welcomes high-quality research articles in all aspects of nutrition. The underlying aim of all work should be, as far as possible, to develop nutritional concepts. JNS encompasses the full spectrum of nutritional science including public health nutrition, epidemiology, dietary surveys, nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, appetite, obesity, ageing, endocrinology, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics, molecular and cellular biology and nutrigenomics. JNS welcomes Primary Research Papers, Brief Reports, Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Workshop Reports, Letters to the Editor and Obituaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信