[Analysis of the global competitive landscape in artificial intelligence medical device research].

Q4 Medicine
Juan Chen, Lizi Pan, Junyu Long, Nan Yang, Fei Liu, Yan Lu, Zhaolian Ouyang
{"title":"[Analysis of the global competitive landscape in artificial intelligence medical device research].","authors":"Juan Chen, Lizi Pan, Junyu Long, Nan Yang, Fei Liu, Yan Lu, Zhaolian Ouyang","doi":"10.7507/1001-5515.202407046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to map the global scientific competitive landscape in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) medical devices using scientific data. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection to examine global research trends in AI-based medical devices. As of the end of 2023, a total of 55 147 relevant publications were identified worldwide, with 76.6% published between 2018 and 2024. Research in this field has primarily focused on AI-assisted medical image and physiological signal analysis. At the national level, China (17 991 publications) and the United States (14 032 publications) lead in output. China has shown a rapid increase in publication volume, with its 2023 output exceeding twice that of the U.S.; however, the U.S. maintains a higher average citation per paper (China: 16.29; U.S.: 35.99). At the institutional level, seven Chinese institutions and three U.S. institutions rank among the global top ten in terms of publication volume. At the researcher level, prominent contributors include Acharya U Rajendra, Rueckert Daniel and Tian Jie, who have extensively explored AI-assisted medical imaging. Some researchers have specialized in specific imaging applications, such as Yang Xiaofeng (AI-assisted precision radiotherapy for tumors) and Shen Dinggang (brain imaging analysis). Others, including Gao Xiaorong and Ming Dong, focus on AI-assisted physiological signal analysis. The results confirm the rapid global development of AI in the medical device field, with \"AI + imaging\" emerging as the most mature direction. China and the U.S. maintain absolute leadership in this area-China slightly leads in publication volume, while the U.S., having started earlier, demonstrates higher research quality. Both countries host a large number of active research teams in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":39324,"journal":{"name":"生物医学工程学杂志","volume":"42 3","pages":"496-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物医学工程学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1001-5515.202407046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to map the global scientific competitive landscape in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) medical devices using scientific data. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection to examine global research trends in AI-based medical devices. As of the end of 2023, a total of 55 147 relevant publications were identified worldwide, with 76.6% published between 2018 and 2024. Research in this field has primarily focused on AI-assisted medical image and physiological signal analysis. At the national level, China (17 991 publications) and the United States (14 032 publications) lead in output. China has shown a rapid increase in publication volume, with its 2023 output exceeding twice that of the U.S.; however, the U.S. maintains a higher average citation per paper (China: 16.29; U.S.: 35.99). At the institutional level, seven Chinese institutions and three U.S. institutions rank among the global top ten in terms of publication volume. At the researcher level, prominent contributors include Acharya U Rajendra, Rueckert Daniel and Tian Jie, who have extensively explored AI-assisted medical imaging. Some researchers have specialized in specific imaging applications, such as Yang Xiaofeng (AI-assisted precision radiotherapy for tumors) and Shen Dinggang (brain imaging analysis). Others, including Gao Xiaorong and Ming Dong, focus on AI-assisted physiological signal analysis. The results confirm the rapid global development of AI in the medical device field, with "AI + imaging" emerging as the most mature direction. China and the U.S. maintain absolute leadership in this area-China slightly leads in publication volume, while the U.S., having started earlier, demonstrates higher research quality. Both countries host a large number of active research teams in this domain.

[人工智能医疗器械研究全球竞争格局分析]。
本研究的目的是利用科学数据绘制人工智能(AI)医疗器械领域的全球科学竞争格局。使用Web of Science核心馆藏进行了文献计量分析,以检查基于人工智能的医疗设备的全球研究趋势。截至2023年底,全球共确定相关出版物55147篇,其中76.6%发表于2018年至2024年。该领域的研究主要集中在人工智能辅助的医学图像和生理信号分析。在国家一级,中国(17 991篇)和美国(14 032篇)的产出领先。中国的论文发表量增长迅速,到2023年将超过美国的两倍;然而,美国保持着较高的平均每篇论文引用数(中国:16.29;美国:35.99)。在机构层面,中国有7所机构和美国有3所机构的论文发表量进入全球前十。在研究人员层面,杰出的贡献者包括Acharya U Rajendra、Rueckert Daniel和Tian Jie,他们对人工智能辅助医学成像进行了广泛的探索。一些研究人员专门研究特定的成像应用,如杨晓峰(人工智能辅助肿瘤精确放疗)和沈定刚(脑成像分析)。包括高晓荣和明东在内的其他人则专注于人工智能辅助的生理信号分析。结果证实了人工智能在全球医疗器械领域的快速发展,其中“AI +成像”成为最成熟的方向。中国和美国在这一领域保持着绝对的领先地位——中国在出版物数量上略微领先,而美国起步较早,研究质量更高。两国都拥有大量活跃在该领域的研究团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
生物医学工程学杂志
生物医学工程学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4868
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信