The Unfinished War: Ethical Challenges in Enhanced Warfighter Reintegration and Long-Term Care.

Q1 Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2025.2519454
Sheena M Eagan, Daniel D Moseley
{"title":"The Unfinished War: Ethical Challenges in Enhanced Warfighter Reintegration and Long-Term Care.","authors":"Sheena M Eagan, Daniel D Moseley","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2025.2519454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As military institutions explore the use of enhancement technologies to improve combat readiness and operational effectiveness, critical ethical and policy questions emerge about the long-term consequences of these interventions. This paper examines the reintegration challenges facing enhanced veterans-those who undergo cognitive, neurological, genetic, or physiological modifications during service-and explores the military's obligations to support their post-service lives. We analyze how enhancements, though often framed as temporary or mission-specific, may result in lasting changes to cognition, emotion, and identity that complicate veterans' ability to rejoin civilian life. Drawing from military ethics, bioethics, and neuroethics literature, we examine issues of autonomy, informed consent, and structural coercion within the hierarchical nature of military service. We argue that enhancement may not only exacerbate existing barriers to healthcare, employment, and social belonging but also generate novel forms of stigma and challenge existing systems of support. To address these challenges, we recommend policy interventions including the establishment of an enhanced veteran registry, expanded research funding, and the development of tailored long-term care strategies. We conclude that protecting the rights and dignity of enhanced service members requires proactive ethical and institutional planning-before, during, and long after their time in uniform.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"321-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2025.2519454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As military institutions explore the use of enhancement technologies to improve combat readiness and operational effectiveness, critical ethical and policy questions emerge about the long-term consequences of these interventions. This paper examines the reintegration challenges facing enhanced veterans-those who undergo cognitive, neurological, genetic, or physiological modifications during service-and explores the military's obligations to support their post-service lives. We analyze how enhancements, though often framed as temporary or mission-specific, may result in lasting changes to cognition, emotion, and identity that complicate veterans' ability to rejoin civilian life. Drawing from military ethics, bioethics, and neuroethics literature, we examine issues of autonomy, informed consent, and structural coercion within the hierarchical nature of military service. We argue that enhancement may not only exacerbate existing barriers to healthcare, employment, and social belonging but also generate novel forms of stigma and challenge existing systems of support. To address these challenges, we recommend policy interventions including the establishment of an enhanced veteran registry, expanded research funding, and the development of tailored long-term care strategies. We conclude that protecting the rights and dignity of enhanced service members requires proactive ethical and institutional planning-before, during, and long after their time in uniform.

未完成的战争:加强战士重返社会和长期护理中的伦理挑战。
随着军事机构探索使用增强技术来提高战备和作战效率,这些干预措施的长期后果出现了关键的道德和政策问题。本文考察了强化退伍军人(在服役期间经历认知、神经、基因或生理改变的退伍军人)面临的重新融入社会的挑战,并探讨了军队支持他们退役后生活的义务。我们分析了增强,虽然通常被认为是暂时的或特定任务的,但可能会导致认知、情感和身份的持久变化,这些变化使退伍军人重新加入平民生活的能力复杂化。从军事伦理学、生物伦理学和神经伦理学文献中,我们研究了军事服务等级性质中的自主性、知情同意和结构性强制问题。我们认为,这种增强不仅会加剧现有的医疗保健、就业和社会归属障碍,还会产生新的耻辱形式,并挑战现有的支持系统。为了应对这些挑战,我们建议采取政策干预措施,包括建立加强的退伍军人登记册,扩大研究经费,以及制定量身定制的长期护理战略。我们的结论是,保护强化服役人员的权利和尊严需要积极主动的道德和制度规划——在他们服役之前、服役期间和服役后很长一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信