Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Is Rarely Done in the Acute Care of ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated by Emergency Medical Services.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jake Toy, Caroline Lauer, Amy H Kaji, Joseph L Thomas, Nichelle Megowan, Nichole Bosson, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Puneet Dhawan, Robert A Kloner, Sara Rasnake, William French, Shira Schlesinger
{"title":"Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Is Rarely Done in the Acute Care of ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated by Emergency Medical Services.","authors":"Jake Toy, Caroline Lauer, Amy H Kaji, Joseph L Thomas, Nichelle Megowan, Nichole Bosson, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Puneet Dhawan, Robert A Kloner, Sara Rasnake, William French, Shira Schlesinger","doi":"10.5811/westjem.35271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for primary revascularization during the acute care of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has declined significantly in the past decade; but there is little data to determine whether there has been a change in the use of CABG for STEMI patients treated by emergency medical services (EMS). In this study we described the incidence of urgent or emergent CABG for STEMI patients treated in a large, regionalized cardiac care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained data obtained for patients transported by EMS between January 2011-December 2022 who were diagnosed with acute STEMI on prehospital or emergency department (ED) electrocardiogram and taken for primary diagnostic catheterization. All STEMI patients were transported by EMS to one of 34 STEMI receiving centers (SRC) in a regionalized cardiac care system, all of which are required to maintain onsite cardiac surgery as a condition of their SRC designation. Patients were considered to have undergone urgent or emergent CABG if it was performed within 72 hours of the primary diagnostic cardiac catheterization. We excluded patients if no diagnostic catheterization was performed or if CABG was performed >72 hours after diagnostic catheterization. The primary outcome was the incidence of urgent or emergent CABG. Patients were further stratified by time between diagnostic catheterization and CABG (<24 hours, 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28,349 patients were transported by EMS and diagnosed with an acute STEMI during the study period. Only 384 (1.35%) patients underwent CABG within 72 hours of diagnostic catheterization: 268 (0.95%) underwent CABG in <24 hours; 71 (0.25%) in 24-48 hours, and 45 (0.16%) in 48-72 hours. The median age of patients undergoing CABG was 64 years (interquartile range 58-72). Twenty-eight (7.3%) experienced prehospital cardiac arrest, and eight (2.1%) required vasopressors. Prior to undergoing CABG, 137 patients (36%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The proportion of patients undergoing CABG within 72 hours remained relatively stable between 2011-2022 at 1.19% and 1.96%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urgent or emergent CABG remained infrequently performed for acute STEMI patients after primary diagnostic catheterization. There was little change in the percentage of STEMI patients who received CABG within 72 hours of diagnostic catheterization over the past decade. These findings suggest that regional or local policies requiring on-site cardiac surgery at SRCs may be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"729-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.35271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for primary revascularization during the acute care of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has declined significantly in the past decade; but there is little data to determine whether there has been a change in the use of CABG for STEMI patients treated by emergency medical services (EMS). In this study we described the incidence of urgent or emergent CABG for STEMI patients treated in a large, regionalized cardiac care system.

Methods: We obtained data obtained for patients transported by EMS between January 2011-December 2022 who were diagnosed with acute STEMI on prehospital or emergency department (ED) electrocardiogram and taken for primary diagnostic catheterization. All STEMI patients were transported by EMS to one of 34 STEMI receiving centers (SRC) in a regionalized cardiac care system, all of which are required to maintain onsite cardiac surgery as a condition of their SRC designation. Patients were considered to have undergone urgent or emergent CABG if it was performed within 72 hours of the primary diagnostic cardiac catheterization. We excluded patients if no diagnostic catheterization was performed or if CABG was performed >72 hours after diagnostic catheterization. The primary outcome was the incidence of urgent or emergent CABG. Patients were further stratified by time between diagnostic catheterization and CABG (<24 hours, 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours).

Results: A total of 28,349 patients were transported by EMS and diagnosed with an acute STEMI during the study period. Only 384 (1.35%) patients underwent CABG within 72 hours of diagnostic catheterization: 268 (0.95%) underwent CABG in <24 hours; 71 (0.25%) in 24-48 hours, and 45 (0.16%) in 48-72 hours. The median age of patients undergoing CABG was 64 years (interquartile range 58-72). Twenty-eight (7.3%) experienced prehospital cardiac arrest, and eight (2.1%) required vasopressors. Prior to undergoing CABG, 137 patients (36%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The proportion of patients undergoing CABG within 72 hours remained relatively stable between 2011-2022 at 1.19% and 1.96%, respectively.

Conclusion: Urgent or emergent CABG remained infrequently performed for acute STEMI patients after primary diagnostic catheterization. There was little change in the percentage of STEMI patients who received CABG within 72 hours of diagnostic catheterization over the past decade. These findings suggest that regional or local policies requiring on-site cardiac surgery at SRCs may be reconsidered.

冠状动脉旁路移植术在急诊治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的急性护理中很少应用。
导语:在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的急性护理中,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)用于初级血运重建术的使用在过去十年中显著下降;但很少有数据可以确定急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗的STEMI患者CABG的使用是否发生了变化。在这项研究中,我们描述了在一个大的、区域化的心脏护理系统中治疗的STEMI患者的紧急或紧急冠脉搭桥的发生率。方法:我们收集了2011年1月至2022年12月期间通过EMS运送的经院前或急诊(ED)心电图诊断为急性STEMI并进行初步诊断导管置入的患者的数据。所有STEMI患者均由EMS运送至区域化心脏护理系统中的34个STEMI接收中心(SRC)之一,所有STEMI接收中心都需要维持现场心脏手术作为其SRC指定的条件。如果患者在最初诊断性心导管插入术后72小时内进行,则认为患者进行了紧急或紧急冠脉搭桥。我们排除了未进行诊断性置管或在诊断性置管后72小时进行CABG的患者。主要结果是紧急或紧急冠脉搭桥的发生率。根据诊断性置管和冠脉搭桥之间的时间对患者进行进一步分层(结果:在研究期间,共有28,349例患者通过EMS转运并被诊断为急性STEMI。只有384例(1.35%)患者在诊断性置管72小时内行冠脉搭桥;268例(0.95%)患者在诊断性置管后行冠脉搭桥。结论:急性STEMI患者在初级诊断性置管后急诊或紧急冠脉搭桥的情况仍然很少。在过去的十年中,STEMI患者在诊断性导管置入72小时内接受CABG的百分比几乎没有变化。这些发现提示需要在src进行现场心脏手术的区域或地方政策可能需要重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信