Images in Black and White: Disparities in Utilization of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for Older Adults with Abdominal Pain.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ijeoma C Unachukwu, Michael N Adjei-Poku, Olivia C Sailors, Rachel Gonzales, Eugenia South, Zach Meisel, Rachel R Kelz, Anne R Cappola, Ari B Friedman
{"title":"Images in Black and White: Disparities in Utilization of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for Older Adults with Abdominal Pain.","authors":"Ijeoma C Unachukwu, Michael N Adjei-Poku, Olivia C Sailors, Rachel Gonzales, Eugenia South, Zach Meisel, Rachel R Kelz, Anne R Cappola, Ari B Friedman","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abdominal pain is the leading emergency department (ED) chief complaint in older (≥65 years of age) adults, accounting for 1.4 million ED visits annually. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are high-yield tests that offer rapid and accurate diagnosis for the most clinically significant causes of abdominal pain. In this study we used nationally representative data to examine racial/ethnic differences in cross-sectional imaging for older adults presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to assess differences in the rate of imaging between White and Black older adults presenting to the ED for abdominal pain. Our primary outcome was the receipt of abdominal CT and/or ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 1,656 older adult ED visits for abdominal pain, White patients were 26.8% (relatively, 14.2% absolute) more likely to receive abdominal CT and/or ultrasound than Black patients: 802 of 1,197 (67.0%) White patients were 26.8% (relatively, 14.2% absolute) more likely to receive abdominal computed tomography and/ or ultrasound than Black patients (P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that Black older adults presenting to the ED with abdominal pain receive significantly lower levels of cross-sectional imaging (CT/ultrasound) than White patients. Our findings highlight the need for further investigations into causes of disparities while initiating quality improvement processes to assess and address site- and clinician-specific patterns of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"452-457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal pain is the leading emergency department (ED) chief complaint in older (≥65 years of age) adults, accounting for 1.4 million ED visits annually. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are high-yield tests that offer rapid and accurate diagnosis for the most clinically significant causes of abdominal pain. In this study we used nationally representative data to examine racial/ethnic differences in cross-sectional imaging for older adults presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to assess differences in the rate of imaging between White and Black older adults presenting to the ED for abdominal pain. Our primary outcome was the receipt of abdominal CT and/or ultrasound imaging.

Results: Across 1,656 older adult ED visits for abdominal pain, White patients were 26.8% (relatively, 14.2% absolute) more likely to receive abdominal CT and/or ultrasound than Black patients: 802 of 1,197 (67.0%) White patients were 26.8% (relatively, 14.2% absolute) more likely to receive abdominal computed tomography and/ or ultrasound than Black patients (P=0.01).

Conclusion: This study revealed that Black older adults presenting to the ED with abdominal pain receive significantly lower levels of cross-sectional imaging (CT/ultrasound) than White patients. Our findings highlight the need for further investigations into causes of disparities while initiating quality improvement processes to assess and address site- and clinician-specific patterns of care.

黑白图像:计算机断层扫描和超声在老年腹痛患者中的应用差异。
简介:腹痛是老年人(≥65岁)急诊科(ED)的主诉,每年急诊科就诊140万人次。超声和计算机断层扫描(CT)是高产出率的测试,可为临床上最重要的腹痛原因提供快速准确的诊断。在这项研究中,我们使用具有全国代表性的数据来检查以腹痛就诊的老年人的横断面成像的种族/民族差异。方法:我们使用来自国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)的数据进行回顾性横断面分析,以评估白人和黑人老年人因腹痛就诊于急诊科的影像率的差异。我们的主要结果是接受腹部CT和/或超声成像。结果:在1,656例因腹痛就诊的老年人ED中,白人患者接受腹部CT和/或超声检查的可能性比黑人患者高26.8%(相对,14.2%绝对);1,197例白人患者中802例(67.0%)白人患者接受腹部CT和/或超声检查的可能性比黑人患者高26.8%(相对,14.2%绝对)(P=0.01)。结论:本研究显示,以腹痛就诊的黑人老年人接受的横断成像(CT/超声)水平明显低于白人患者。我们的研究结果强调需要进一步调查差异的原因,同时启动质量改进过程,以评估和解决具体地点和临床医生的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信