A Retrospective Study on the Effect of STA Anesthesia Technique in the Extraction of Impacted Teeth in Dental Outpatients and Its Impact on Patient Anxiety Levels.
IF 2.8 3区 医学Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Jie Xu, Junsen Su, Guangfeng Liu, Wanggui Ying, Fang Yuan
{"title":"A Retrospective Study on the Effect of STA Anesthesia Technique in the Extraction of Impacted Teeth in Dental Outpatients and Its Impact on Patient Anxiety Levels.","authors":"Jie Xu, Junsen Su, Guangfeng Liu, Wanggui Ying, Fang Yuan","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S523718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of the Single Tooth Anesthesia (STA) technique in dental outpatient patients undergoing the extraction of impacted teeth and its impact on patient anxiety levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included clinical data from 130 patients who underwent the extraction of a single mandibular impacted tooth in our dental outpatient department between April 2022 and June 2024. According to the anesthesia method, patients were divided into two groups: the Traditional Group (n = 65, receiving traditional local injection anesthesia) and the STA Group (n = 65, receiving Single Tooth Anesthesia). Parameters including intraoperative bleeding, duration of anesthesia, extent of anesthetic infiltration, blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], heart rate (HR), pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], compliance (Frankl treatment compliance scale), tolerance (Houpt behavior scale), and anxiety level [modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS)] were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the amount of bleeding, anesthesia duration, or infiltration range between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the Traditional Group, SBP at 3 minutes after anesthesia and post-extraction was significantly higher than before anesthesia (P < 0.05), whereas DBP and HR showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). In the STA Group, SBP, DBP, and HR remained stable across the three time points (P > 0.05). Compared with the Traditional Group, the STA Group showed significantly lower pain scores, reduced anxiety, and higher rates of treatment compliance and tolerance (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the STA anesthesia technique showed advantages over traditional local injection anesthesia in reducing pain and anxiety, while improving compliance and tolerance during impacted tooth extraction in dental outpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"941-950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S523718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of the Single Tooth Anesthesia (STA) technique in dental outpatient patients undergoing the extraction of impacted teeth and its impact on patient anxiety levels.
Methods: This retrospective study included clinical data from 130 patients who underwent the extraction of a single mandibular impacted tooth in our dental outpatient department between April 2022 and June 2024. According to the anesthesia method, patients were divided into two groups: the Traditional Group (n = 65, receiving traditional local injection anesthesia) and the STA Group (n = 65, receiving Single Tooth Anesthesia). Parameters including intraoperative bleeding, duration of anesthesia, extent of anesthetic infiltration, blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], heart rate (HR), pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], compliance (Frankl treatment compliance scale), tolerance (Houpt behavior scale), and anxiety level [modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS)] were compared between the two groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in the amount of bleeding, anesthesia duration, or infiltration range between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the Traditional Group, SBP at 3 minutes after anesthesia and post-extraction was significantly higher than before anesthesia (P < 0.05), whereas DBP and HR showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). In the STA Group, SBP, DBP, and HR remained stable across the three time points (P > 0.05). Compared with the Traditional Group, the STA Group showed significantly lower pain scores, reduced anxiety, and higher rates of treatment compliance and tolerance (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the STA anesthesia technique showed advantages over traditional local injection anesthesia in reducing pain and anxiety, while improving compliance and tolerance during impacted tooth extraction in dental outpatients.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.