Validation of the Saint Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Scale (SPECS) for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwaf002
Aein Zarrin, Jennifer J Telford, Neal Shahidi, Natasha Harris, Cherry Galorport, Robert Enns
{"title":"Validation of the Saint Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Scale (SPECS) for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.","authors":"Aein Zarrin, Jennifer J Telford, Neal Shahidi, Natasha Harris, Cherry Galorport, Robert Enns","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwaf002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient comfort is an important predictor of patient satisfaction and a quality indicator in endoscopy. The St. Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Score (SPECS), previously validated for colonoscopy, was assessed for measuring patient comfort during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 3 groups of assessors (gastroenterologists, nurses, and observers) used SPECS and the modified Gloucester Comfort Scale (GS) to measure patients' comfort during outpatient EGD. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and satisfaction survey. Descriptive statistics and inter-rater reliability were calculated across the 3 groups for both tools. The correlation between SPECS, GS, and VAS was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred subjects were included. The mean age was 56.7 years (SD 14.7 years) and 160 (53.3%) were male. Overall, 89.0% (<i>N</i>=267) of subjects received conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl at a mean dose of 3.3 mg (SD 1.6 mg) and 51.4 mcg (SD 29.7 mcg), respectively. The mean total SPECS for physicians, nurses, and observers were 1.3 (SD 1.6), 1.4 (SD 1.7), and 1.7 (SD 1.9), respectively. Amongst the 3 assessors (9 physicians, 5 nurses, and 4 observers), SPECS and GS demonstrated good inter-rater reliability with an intraclass coefficient of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69), respectively. SPECS and GS had a mild correlation with VAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPECS is a reliable assessment tool to measure patient comfort during EGD. SPECS may be used to audit patient comfort at a facility and physician level.</p>","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"8 3","pages":"112-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient comfort is an important predictor of patient satisfaction and a quality indicator in endoscopy. The St. Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Score (SPECS), previously validated for colonoscopy, was assessed for measuring patient comfort during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 3 groups of assessors (gastroenterologists, nurses, and observers) used SPECS and the modified Gloucester Comfort Scale (GS) to measure patients' comfort during outpatient EGD. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and satisfaction survey. Descriptive statistics and inter-rater reliability were calculated across the 3 groups for both tools. The correlation between SPECS, GS, and VAS was calculated.

Results: Three hundred subjects were included. The mean age was 56.7 years (SD 14.7 years) and 160 (53.3%) were male. Overall, 89.0% (N=267) of subjects received conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl at a mean dose of 3.3 mg (SD 1.6 mg) and 51.4 mcg (SD 29.7 mcg), respectively. The mean total SPECS for physicians, nurses, and observers were 1.3 (SD 1.6), 1.4 (SD 1.7), and 1.7 (SD 1.9), respectively. Amongst the 3 assessors (9 physicians, 5 nurses, and 4 observers), SPECS and GS demonstrated good inter-rater reliability with an intraclass coefficient of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69), respectively. SPECS and GS had a mild correlation with VAS.

Conclusions: SPECS is a reliable assessment tool to measure patient comfort during EGD. SPECS may be used to audit patient comfort at a facility and physician level.

圣保罗内镜舒适度量表(SPECS)用于上消化道内镜检查的验证。
患者舒适度是内窥镜检查患者满意度的重要预测指标和质量指标。St. Paul's内镜舒适度评分(SPECS),先前被验证用于结肠镜检查,用于评估患者在食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)期间的舒适度。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,3组评估者(胃肠病学家、护士和观察员)使用SPECS和改进的Gloucester舒适度量表(GS)来测量门诊EGD期间患者的舒适度。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和满意度调查对患者报告的结果进行测量。对两种工具的三组间进行描述性统计和评分者间信度计算。计算SPECS、GS和VAS之间的相关性。结果:纳入受试者300人。平均年龄56.7岁(SD 14.7岁),男性160例(53.3%)。总体而言,89.0% (N=267)的受试者接受了静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼的清醒镇静,平均剂量分别为3.3 mg (SD 1.6 mg)和51.4 mcg (SD 29.7 mcg)。医生、护士和观察员的平均总spec分别为1.3 (SD 1.6)、1.4 (SD 1.7)和1.7 (SD 1.9)。在3名评估者(9名医生、5名护士和4名观察员)中,SPECS和GS表现出良好的评估间信度,类内系数分别为0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.76)和0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69)。SPECS和GS与VAS有轻微的相关性。结论:SPECS是衡量EGD患者舒适度的可靠评估工具。SPECS可用于在机构和医生层面审核患者舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信