Navigating Appropriateness of Care in the ICU: A Case-Based Application of the Fourfold Assessment.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Katerina Rusinova, Louis Voigt, Andrej Michalsen
{"title":"Navigating Appropriateness of Care in the ICU: A Case-Based Application of the Fourfold Assessment.","authors":"Katerina Rusinova, Louis Voigt, Andrej Michalsen","doi":"10.1177/08850666251352456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeAppropriateness of care is a fundamental yet often underexamined aspect of critical care medicine. Drawing on Kant's notion of appropriateness as providing \"no more and no less than the matter requires,\" we explore how clinicians can align medical indication with patient or surrogate consent. Misalignments in this regard may result in overtreatment or undertreatment, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and dissatisfaction among families and clinicians.MethodsWe present a case report of an elderly patient whose clinical course in the intensive care unit (ICU) traverses all four quadrants of a proposed framework-the Fourfold Table of Appropriateness. This conceptual tool classifies medical interventions according to two dimensions: medical indication (yes/no) and patient or surrogate consent (yes/no). Each quadrant is associated with ethical and clinical implications and is color-coded like a traffic light to support real-time decision-making: green (appropriate), yellow (caution), red (stop).ResultsThe case illustrates how alignment between indication and consent fosters goal-concordant care. It also demonstrates how therapeutic obstinance, paternalism, or emotionally driven demands may lead to inappropriate care. Each episode reveals different challenges-physician biases, surrogate distress, unclear prognoses-and highlights the role of communication, shared decision-making, and clinical humility.ConclusionThe Fourfold Table provides a didactic framework to guide structured reflection among ICU clinicians. By naming and examining patterns of inappropriateness, it fosters ethical awareness and better communication practices. This case-based approach highlights the necessity of early recognition of misalignments, the importance of addressing emotional and cognitive biases, and the value of interventions such as time-limited trials and family-centered care. Ultimately, this framework contributes to more compassionate, appropriate, and goal-aligned critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251352456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251352456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAppropriateness of care is a fundamental yet often underexamined aspect of critical care medicine. Drawing on Kant's notion of appropriateness as providing "no more and no less than the matter requires," we explore how clinicians can align medical indication with patient or surrogate consent. Misalignments in this regard may result in overtreatment or undertreatment, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and dissatisfaction among families and clinicians.MethodsWe present a case report of an elderly patient whose clinical course in the intensive care unit (ICU) traverses all four quadrants of a proposed framework-the Fourfold Table of Appropriateness. This conceptual tool classifies medical interventions according to two dimensions: medical indication (yes/no) and patient or surrogate consent (yes/no). Each quadrant is associated with ethical and clinical implications and is color-coded like a traffic light to support real-time decision-making: green (appropriate), yellow (caution), red (stop).ResultsThe case illustrates how alignment between indication and consent fosters goal-concordant care. It also demonstrates how therapeutic obstinance, paternalism, or emotionally driven demands may lead to inappropriate care. Each episode reveals different challenges-physician biases, surrogate distress, unclear prognoses-and highlights the role of communication, shared decision-making, and clinical humility.ConclusionThe Fourfold Table provides a didactic framework to guide structured reflection among ICU clinicians. By naming and examining patterns of inappropriateness, it fosters ethical awareness and better communication practices. This case-based approach highlights the necessity of early recognition of misalignments, the importance of addressing emotional and cognitive biases, and the value of interventions such as time-limited trials and family-centered care. Ultimately, this framework contributes to more compassionate, appropriate, and goal-aligned critical care.

引导ICU护理的适宜性:基于案例的四重评估应用。
目的适当的护理是一个基本的,但往往被忽视的方面危重病护理医学。借鉴康德关于适当性的概念,即提供“不多于也不少于事情所要求的”,我们探讨临床医生如何将医学指证与患者或代理人的同意结合起来。在这方面的错位可能导致过度治疗或治疗不足,导致道德困扰,倦怠,以及家庭和临床医生的不满。方法我们提出了一个老年患者的病例报告,其在重症监护病房(ICU)的临床过程贯穿了提出的框架的所有四个象限-四重适当性表。这个概念工具根据两个方面对医疗干预进行分类:医学指征(是/否)和患者或代理同意(是/否)。每个象限都与伦理和临床意义相关,并像交通灯一样进行颜色编码,以支持实时决策:绿色(适当),黄色(警告),红色(停止)。结果该病例说明了指征和同意之间的一致性如何促进目标一致的护理。它还证明了治疗顽固,家长式作风或情感驱动的要求如何导致不适当的护理。每一集都揭示了不同的挑战——医生的偏见、代理的痛苦、不明确的预后——并强调了沟通、共同决策和临床谦卑的作用。结论四重表提供了一个指导ICU临床医生进行结构化反思的教学框架。通过命名和检查不适当的模式,它培养了道德意识和更好的沟通实践。这种基于病例的方法强调了早期识别失调的必要性,解决情感和认知偏见的重要性,以及诸如限时试验和以家庭为中心的护理等干预措施的价值。最终,这一框架有助于实现更富有同情心、更恰当、更目标一致的重症监护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信