Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Higher Fecal Immunochemical Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients: Retrospective Analysis.
Meenesh Bhimani, R Hal Baker, Markel Sanz Ausin, Gerald Meixiong, Rae Lasko, Mariska Raglow-Defranco, Alex Miller, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Saad Godil, Anderson Cook, Jonathan D Agnew, Ashish Atreja
{"title":"Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Higher Fecal Immunochemical Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients: Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Meenesh Bhimani, R Hal Baker, Markel Sanz Ausin, Gerald Meixiong, Rae Lasko, Mariska Raglow-Defranco, Alex Miller, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Saad Godil, Anderson Cook, Jonathan D Agnew, Ashish Atreja","doi":"10.2196/71211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain disproportionately low among Hispanic and Latino populations compared to non-Hispanic White populations. While artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in health care delivery, concerns exist that AI-based interventions may disadvantage non-English-speaking populations due to biases in development and deployment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multilingual AI care agent in engaging Spanish-speaking patients for CRC screening compared to that with English-speaking patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined an AI-powered outreach initiative at WellSpan Health in Pennsylvania and Maryland during September 2024. The study included 1878 patients (517 Spanish-speaking, 1361 English-speaking) eligible for CRC screening who lacked active web-based health profiles. A multilingual AI conversational agent conducted personalized telephone calls in the patient's preferred language to provide education about CRC screening and facilitate fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit requests. The primary outcome was the FIT test opt-in rate, with secondary outcomes including connect rates and call duration. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spanish-speaking patients demonstrated significantly higher engagement across all measures than English-speaking patients with respect to FIT test opt-in rates (18.2% vs 7.1%, P<.001), connect rates (69.6% vs 53.0%, P<.001), and call duration (6.05 vs 4.03 minutes, P<.001). Demographically, Spanish-speaking patients were younger (mean age 57 vs 61 years, P<.001) and more likely to be female (49.1% vs 38.4%, P<.001). In multivariate analysis, Spanish language preference remained an independent predictor of FIT test opt-in (adjusted odds ratio 2.012, 95% CI 1.340-3.019; P<.001) after controlling for demographic factors and call duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-powered outreach achieved significantly higher engagement among Spanish-speaking patients, challenging the assumption that technological interventions inherently disadvantage non-English-speaking populations. The 2.6-fold higher FIT test opt-in rate among Spanish-speaking patients represents a notable departure from historical patterns of health care disparities. These findings suggest that language-concordant AI interactions may help address longstanding disparities in preventive care access. Study limitations include its single health care system setting, short duration, and lack of follow-up data on completed screenings. Future research should assess long-term adherence and whether higher engagement translates to improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e71211"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain disproportionately low among Hispanic and Latino populations compared to non-Hispanic White populations. While artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in health care delivery, concerns exist that AI-based interventions may disadvantage non-English-speaking populations due to biases in development and deployment.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multilingual AI care agent in engaging Spanish-speaking patients for CRC screening compared to that with English-speaking patients.
Methods: This retrospective analysis examined an AI-powered outreach initiative at WellSpan Health in Pennsylvania and Maryland during September 2024. The study included 1878 patients (517 Spanish-speaking, 1361 English-speaking) eligible for CRC screening who lacked active web-based health profiles. A multilingual AI conversational agent conducted personalized telephone calls in the patient's preferred language to provide education about CRC screening and facilitate fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit requests. The primary outcome was the FIT test opt-in rate, with secondary outcomes including connect rates and call duration. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Spanish-speaking patients demonstrated significantly higher engagement across all measures than English-speaking patients with respect to FIT test opt-in rates (18.2% vs 7.1%, P<.001), connect rates (69.6% vs 53.0%, P<.001), and call duration (6.05 vs 4.03 minutes, P<.001). Demographically, Spanish-speaking patients were younger (mean age 57 vs 61 years, P<.001) and more likely to be female (49.1% vs 38.4%, P<.001). In multivariate analysis, Spanish language preference remained an independent predictor of FIT test opt-in (adjusted odds ratio 2.012, 95% CI 1.340-3.019; P<.001) after controlling for demographic factors and call duration.
Conclusions: AI-powered outreach achieved significantly higher engagement among Spanish-speaking patients, challenging the assumption that technological interventions inherently disadvantage non-English-speaking populations. The 2.6-fold higher FIT test opt-in rate among Spanish-speaking patients represents a notable departure from historical patterns of health care disparities. These findings suggest that language-concordant AI interactions may help address longstanding disparities in preventive care access. Study limitations include its single health care system setting, short duration, and lack of follow-up data on completed screenings. Future research should assess long-term adherence and whether higher engagement translates to improved clinical outcomes.
背景:与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔和拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率仍然低得不成比例。虽然人工智能(AI)在医疗保健服务方面显示出前景,但人们担心,由于开发和部署方面的偏见,基于人工智能的干预措施可能会使非英语人群处于不利地位。目的:本研究旨在评估多语言人工智能护理剂在西班牙语患者CRC筛查中的效果,并将其与英语患者进行比较。方法:本回顾性分析检查了2024年9月在宾夕法尼亚州和马里兰州WellSpan Health开展的人工智能外展计划。该研究纳入了1878名患者(517名说西班牙语,1361名说英语),这些患者缺乏积极的网络健康档案,符合CRC筛查条件。多语言AI会话代理以患者首选语言进行个性化电话呼叫,以提供有关CRC筛查的教育,并促进粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)试剂盒的要求。主要结果是FIT测试的选择率,次要结果包括接通率和通话持续时间。统计分析包括描述性统计、双变量比较和多变量逻辑回归。结果:在FIT测试的选择率方面,讲西班牙语的患者比讲英语的患者在所有测量中表现出更高的参与度(18.2% vs 7.1%)。结论:人工智能支持的外展在讲西班牙语的患者中实现了更高的参与度,挑战了技术干预天生不利于非英语人群的假设。在说西班牙语的患者中,FIT测试的选择率高出2.6倍,这与医疗保健差异的历史模式明显不同。这些发现表明,语言协调的人工智能互动可能有助于解决预防保健获取方面长期存在的差异。研究的局限性包括其单一的卫生保健系统设置,持续时间短,以及缺乏完成筛查的随访数据。未来的研究应该评估长期依从性,以及更高的参与度是否转化为更好的临床结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades.
As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor.
Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.