Modifying Trauma Team Activation Criteria to Increase Rates of Appropriate Triage: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Megan E Knapp, Jacob Smith, Katie L Bower, Pamela A Boremski, Bryan R Collier, Jacob R Gillen
{"title":"Modifying Trauma Team Activation Criteria to Increase Rates of Appropriate Triage: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Megan E Knapp, Jacob Smith, Katie L Bower, Pamela A Boremski, Bryan R Collier, Jacob R Gillen","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons has designated six minimum criteria for a full trauma team activation, to which many Trauma Centers add criteria to reduce rates of mistriage. However, there is no consensus on what the optimal trauma team activation criteria should be. At our institution, suboptimal rates of overtriage were detected, so the trauma team activation criteria were modified to improve overtriage.</p><p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The objective was to retrospectively evaluate triage patterns before and after implementation of modified trauma team activation criteria. The hypothesis was that rates of appropriate triage and overtriage would improve following criteria modification without a significant increase in undertriaged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rates of appropriate triage, overtriage, and undertriage were assessed before and after the implementation of the modified criteria. Triage patterns were evaluated using the Standardized Trauma Assessment Tool. Statistical analyses were conducted with an alpha level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified criteria were associated with increased appropriate triage (74.7-79.4%, p < 0.01) due to a decrease in overtriage from 57.0% to 45.7% (p < 0.001). There was no change in undertriage (3.2-4.9%, p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study assessed triage patterns associated with simplified, modified trauma team activation criteria at a Level 1 Trauma Center. The modified criteria were associated with decreased overtriage without increasing undertriage. These findings support simplifying trauma team activation criteria as an approach to improving rates of appropriate triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The American College of Surgeons has designated six minimum criteria for a full trauma team activation, to which many Trauma Centers add criteria to reduce rates of mistriage. However, there is no consensus on what the optimal trauma team activation criteria should be. At our institution, suboptimal rates of overtriage were detected, so the trauma team activation criteria were modified to improve overtriage.

Study objectives: The objective was to retrospectively evaluate triage patterns before and after implementation of modified trauma team activation criteria. The hypothesis was that rates of appropriate triage and overtriage would improve following criteria modification without a significant increase in undertriaged patients.

Methods: Rates of appropriate triage, overtriage, and undertriage were assessed before and after the implementation of the modified criteria. Triage patterns were evaluated using the Standardized Trauma Assessment Tool. Statistical analyses were conducted with an alpha level of 0.05.

Results: The modified criteria were associated with increased appropriate triage (74.7-79.4%, p < 0.01) due to a decrease in overtriage from 57.0% to 45.7% (p < 0.001). There was no change in undertriage (3.2-4.9%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: This study assessed triage patterns associated with simplified, modified trauma team activation criteria at a Level 1 Trauma Center. The modified criteria were associated with decreased overtriage without increasing undertriage. These findings support simplifying trauma team activation criteria as an approach to improving rates of appropriate triage.

修改创伤小组激活标准以增加适当分诊率:一项回顾性研究。
背景:美国外科医师学会已经指定了6个最低标准的一个完整的创伤小组的激活,许多创伤中心增加标准,以减少失败率。然而,对于最佳的创伤小组激活标准应该是什么,并没有达成共识。在我们的机构,发现了过度分类的次优率,因此修改了创伤小组激活标准以改善过度分类。研究目的:目的是回顾性地评估实施修改后的创伤小组激活标准前后的分诊模式。假设是,适当的分诊率和过度分诊率会在标准修改后得到改善,而没有显著增加分诊不足的患者。方法:对修订标准实施前后的分诊率、分诊过度率和分诊不足率进行评估。使用标准化创伤评估工具评估分诊模式。采用α水平0.05进行统计学分析。结果:修改后的标准与适当分诊率的增加相关(74.7% ~ 79.4%,p < 0.01),因为过度分诊率从57.0%下降到45.7% (p < 0.001)。undertriage无变化(3.2 ~ 4.9%,p = 0.05)。结论:本研究评估了一级创伤中心简化、修改的创伤小组激活标准相关的分诊模式。修改后的标准与减少过度分类而不增加不足分类有关。这些发现支持简化创伤小组激活标准作为提高适当分诊率的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信