A Randomized Controlled Trial of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Provision in the Emergency Department (PrEPPED).

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ethan Cowan, Erick Eiting, Clare O'Brien-Lambert, Jacqueline Ryder, Yvette Calderon
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Provision in the Emergency Department (PrEPPED).","authors":"Ethan Cowan, Erick Eiting, Clare O'Brien-Lambert, Jacqueline Ryder, Yvette Calderon","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV transmission. However, PrEP remains underutilized due to structural, provider, and individual-level barriers, with significant disparities in access. Emergency departments (EDs) serve high-risk populations often disconnected from primary care, offering a strategic setting for initiating PrEP services. In spite of the potential, ED-based PrEP programs face challenges, and the feasibility of initiating PrEP in this setting is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of immediate PrEP initiation (iPrEP) in the ED on PrEP usage at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomized eligible ED patients 1:1 to iPrEP in the ED with a 28-day starter pack given at discharge vs. referral for outpatient PrEP initiation. Participants were followed for 90 days, with the primary outcome being PrEP usage. Secondary outcomes were PrEP usage at 30 and 60 days, retention in care at 30, 60, and 90 days, HIV risk, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1455 patients screened, 169 were eligible, 27 were randomized, and 26 received their assigned intervention. At 90 days, only 3 participants were taking PrEP (2 iPrEP, 1 referral). Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days revealed no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP initiation in the ED did not improve PrEP usage or retention in care compared with referral alone. Despite high satisfaction with the screening process, barriers to ED-based PrEP initiation, including low interest and awareness, persisted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV transmission. However, PrEP remains underutilized due to structural, provider, and individual-level barriers, with significant disparities in access. Emergency departments (EDs) serve high-risk populations often disconnected from primary care, offering a strategic setting for initiating PrEP services. In spite of the potential, ED-based PrEP programs face challenges, and the feasibility of initiating PrEP in this setting is unclear.

Objectives: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of immediate PrEP initiation (iPrEP) in the ED on PrEP usage at 90 days.

Methods: The trial randomized eligible ED patients 1:1 to iPrEP in the ED with a 28-day starter pack given at discharge vs. referral for outpatient PrEP initiation. Participants were followed for 90 days, with the primary outcome being PrEP usage. Secondary outcomes were PrEP usage at 30 and 60 days, retention in care at 30, 60, and 90 days, HIV risk, and satisfaction.

Results: Of 1455 patients screened, 169 were eligible, 27 were randomized, and 26 received their assigned intervention. At 90 days, only 3 participants were taking PrEP (2 iPrEP, 1 referral). Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days revealed no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome.

Conclusions: PrEP initiation in the ED did not improve PrEP usage or retention in care compared with referral alone. Despite high satisfaction with the screening process, barriers to ED-based PrEP initiation, including low interest and awareness, persisted.

在急诊科提供HIV暴露前预防的随机对照试验(prep)。
背景:口服人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)暴露前预防(PrEP)可有效减少HIV的传播。然而,由于结构性、提供者和个人层面的障碍,预防PrEP仍未得到充分利用,在获取方面存在重大差异。急诊科(EDs)服务于往往与初级保健脱节的高危人群,为启动PrEP服务提供了战略环境。尽管有潜力,但基于教育的PrEP项目面临挑战,在这种情况下启动PrEP的可行性尚不清楚。目的:本试点随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估在ED中立即开始PrEP (iPrEP)对90天PrEP使用的影响。方法:该试验将符合条件的ED患者按1:1的比例随机分配到iPrEP,并在出院时给予28天的启动包,而不是转诊进行门诊PrEP启动。参与者被跟踪了90天,主要结果是PrEP的使用情况。次要结局是PrEP在30天和60天的使用,30、60和90天的护理保留,HIV风险和满意度。结果:在筛选的1455名患者中,169名符合条件,27名随机分组,26名接受指定干预。在90天,只有3名参与者服用PrEP(2名iPrEP, 1名转诊)。在30,60和90天的随访显示,两组之间在任何次要结果上没有显著差异。结论:与单独转诊相比,在急诊科开始使用PrEP并没有改善PrEP的使用或保留。尽管对筛查过程非常满意,但基于ed的PrEP启动的障碍,包括低兴趣和意识,仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信