Gender-Specific Population Attributable Fractions for Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality Associated with Living Arrangement in Community-Dwelling Older People.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Alice J Owen, J R Baker, Irja Isaksen, Rosanne Freak-Poli
{"title":"Gender-Specific Population Attributable Fractions for Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality Associated with Living Arrangement in Community-Dwelling Older People.","authors":"Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Alice J Owen, J R Baker, Irja Isaksen, Rosanne Freak-Poli","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living alone poses significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risks. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of disease burden attributable to a specific risk factor. This study aims to estimate the PAF for CVD and all-cause mortality related to living completely alone. Additionally, the study examined the PAFs associated with not living with a partner/spouse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used longitudinal data from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and its sub-study, the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP), which included 5853 men and 6998 women. The participants were community-dwelling healthy adults aged 70 + years without CVD, dementia, or significant physical disabilities. Adjusting for social determinants and traditional risk factors, the gender-specific PAFs of CVD and all-cause mortality attributable to living completely alone and not living with a partner/spouse were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women, 13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%) of CVD events could be attributed to living completely alone, and 14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%) to not living with a partner/spouse. For all-cause mortality in women, the corresponding PAFs were 9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%), respectively. In contrast, among men, only the PAF between not living with a partner/spouse and all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (PAF = 6.0%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.2%). The remaining PAF estimates for CVD events and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed gender differences in CVD and all-cause mortality related to living alone highlight the need for tailored public health interventions to meet gender-specific needs for social connectedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living alone poses significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risks. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of disease burden attributable to a specific risk factor. This study aims to estimate the PAF for CVD and all-cause mortality related to living completely alone. Additionally, the study examined the PAFs associated with not living with a partner/spouse.

Methods: This study used longitudinal data from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and its sub-study, the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP), which included 5853 men and 6998 women. The participants were community-dwelling healthy adults aged 70 + years without CVD, dementia, or significant physical disabilities. Adjusting for social determinants and traditional risk factors, the gender-specific PAFs of CVD and all-cause mortality attributable to living completely alone and not living with a partner/spouse were determined.

Results: Among women, 13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%) of CVD events could be attributed to living completely alone, and 14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%) to not living with a partner/spouse. For all-cause mortality in women, the corresponding PAFs were 9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%), respectively. In contrast, among men, only the PAF between not living with a partner/spouse and all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (PAF = 6.0%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.2%). The remaining PAF estimates for CVD events and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The observed gender differences in CVD and all-cause mortality related to living alone highlight the need for tailored public health interventions to meet gender-specific needs for social connectedness.

与社区居住老年人生活安排相关的心血管疾病和全因死亡率的性别人群归因分数
背景:独居具有显著的心血管疾病(CVD)和死亡风险。人口归因分数(PAF)量化了归因于特定危险因素的疾病负担的比例。本研究旨在估计与完全独居相关的心血管疾病的PAF和全因死亡率。此外,该研究还调查了与没有伴侣/配偶生活有关的paf。方法:本研究使用了阿司匹林减少老年人事件(ASPREE)研究及其子研究ASPREE老年人纵向研究(ALSOP)的纵向数据,其中包括5853名男性和6998名女性。参与者是居住在社区的70岁以上的健康成年人,没有心血管疾病、痴呆或明显的身体残疾。调整社会决定因素和传统危险因素,确定CVD的性别特异性paf和归因于完全独居和没有与伴侣/配偶生活的全因死亡率。结果:在女性中,13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%)的心血管疾病事件可归因于完全独居,14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%)归因于未与伴侣/配偶生活。对于女性全因死亡率,相应的paf分别为9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%)和12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%)。相比之下,在男性中,只有无伴侣/配偶生活与全因死亡率之间的PAF具有统计学意义(PAF = 6.0%;95% ci: 1.7%, 10.2%)。其余的PAF对CVD事件和全因死亡率的估计没有统计学意义。结论:观察到的与独居相关的心血管疾病和全因死亡率的性别差异,突出了需要量身定制的公共卫生干预措施,以满足性别特定的社会联系需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信