Clinical Characteristics of Dizzy Patients Showing Discordant Results Between Bithermal Caloric Test and Video Head Impulse Test.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hahn Jin Jung, Sangeun Lee, Hyeop Oh, Jee Hye Wee, Chang Gun Cho, Joo Hyun Park
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics of Dizzy Patients Showing Discordant Results Between Bithermal Caloric Test and Video Head Impulse Test.","authors":"Hahn Jin Jung, Sangeun Lee, Hyeop Oh, Jee Hye Wee, Chang Gun Cho, Joo Hyun Park","doi":"10.3390/jcm14124350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To evaluate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic significance of dissociation between bithermal caloric test and video head impulse test (vHIT) in patients presenting with dizziness. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 644 patients who underwent bithermal caloric testing and vHIT at a university-affiliated general hospital. Patients were classified into concordant and discordant groups based on test results. The discordant group was further subdivided into those with abnormal caloric test and normal vHIT, and those with normal caloric test and abnormal vHIT. Demographic data, vestibular function test outcomes, and clinical diagnoses were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: Discordant results were observed in 36.5% of patients. Among these, 31.8% had abnormal caloric responses with normal vHIT, and 4.7% had normal caloric responses with abnormal vHIT. Most patients in both discordant subgroups were diagnosed with peripheral vestibular disorders, such as Ménière's disease and unilateral vestibulopathy. The abnormal caloric/normal vHIT pattern was more common and associated with low-frequency dysfunction. The normal caloric/abnormal vHIT pattern, though less frequent, also involved predominantly peripheral etiologies. <b>Conclusions</b>: Dissociation between caloric and vHIT results is not uncommon and provides important diagnostic insights. Employing both tests in a complementary manner enhances the identification of frequency-specific vestibular deficits and supports more accurate diagnosis and management of vestibular disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic significance of dissociation between bithermal caloric test and video head impulse test (vHIT) in patients presenting with dizziness. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 644 patients who underwent bithermal caloric testing and vHIT at a university-affiliated general hospital. Patients were classified into concordant and discordant groups based on test results. The discordant group was further subdivided into those with abnormal caloric test and normal vHIT, and those with normal caloric test and abnormal vHIT. Demographic data, vestibular function test outcomes, and clinical diagnoses were analyzed. Results: Discordant results were observed in 36.5% of patients. Among these, 31.8% had abnormal caloric responses with normal vHIT, and 4.7% had normal caloric responses with abnormal vHIT. Most patients in both discordant subgroups were diagnosed with peripheral vestibular disorders, such as Ménière's disease and unilateral vestibulopathy. The abnormal caloric/normal vHIT pattern was more common and associated with low-frequency dysfunction. The normal caloric/abnormal vHIT pattern, though less frequent, also involved predominantly peripheral etiologies. Conclusions: Dissociation between caloric and vHIT results is not uncommon and provides important diagnostic insights. Employing both tests in a complementary manner enhances the identification of frequency-specific vestibular deficits and supports more accurate diagnosis and management of vestibular disorders.

热热试验与视频脑脉冲试验结果不一致的眩晕患者临床特征分析。
背景/目的:探讨双热热试验与视频头冲试验(vHIT)分离在眩晕患者中的临床特点及诊断意义。方法:我们回顾性分析了644例在某大学附属综合医院接受了双热热测试和vHIT的患者。根据检测结果将患者分为和谐组和不和谐组。不协调组又分为热量测试异常、vHIT正常组、热量测试正常、vHIT异常组。统计数据、前庭功能测试结果和临床诊断进行分析。结果:36.5%的患者结果不一致。其中,31.8%的患者热量反应异常,vHIT正常;4.7%的患者热量反应正常,vHIT异常。在这两个不一致的亚组中,大多数患者被诊断为外周前庭疾病,如membroni病和单侧前庭病变。异常热量/正常vHIT模式更常见,并与低频功能障碍相关。正常热量/异常vHIT模式,虽然不太常见,也主要涉及外周病因。结论:热量和vHIT结果之间的分离并不罕见,并提供了重要的诊断见解。以互补的方式采用这两种测试增强了对频率特异性前庭功能缺陷的识别,并支持更准确的前庭功能障碍的诊断和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信