Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andrea Rockall, Jacob J Visser, Cristina Garcia-Villar, Naama Lev-Cohain, Patrick Omoumi, Marie-Pierre Revel, Ruth Mary Strudwick
{"title":"Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care.","authors":"Andrea Rockall, Jacob J Visser, Cristina Garcia-Villar, Naama Lev-Cohain, Patrick Omoumi, Marie-Pierre Revel, Ruth Mary Strudwick","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02002-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring the value that radiology brings to patient care can be challenging. A positive patient experience is consistently associated with patient safety, clinical effectiveness, and outcome measures and is therefore a tool for measuring value-based care. Monitoring the experience of users of radiology services is an indispensable component of quality improvement programmes for radiology departments. The integration of comprehensive feedback mechanisms brings numerous benefits, including enhanced care, strengthened trust, and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. Feedback should be collected from a variety of stakeholders through a 360-degree approach, combining both systematically performed structured methods, such as formal surveys, and unstructured methods, such as informal and opportunistic information gathering during multidisciplinary rounds. To maximise the impact of feedback, it should be frequent and diverse, ensuring that all perspectives are considered. Leaders in radiology must prioritise embedding a culture of feedback within their institutions, recognising its crucial role in continuous improvement. It is essential to ensure that our departments consistently provide value to our most important stakeholders-the patients-but also to our referrers and trainees. In this article, we consider methods for collecting feedback and provide some of the key findings from the literature. By fostering an environment that values and acts upon feedback, we can achieve significant advancements in patient care and overall service quality in radiology. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Regular feedback from patients, peers, radiographers, referrers, trainees and other users of imaging services is an essential tool for continuous quality improvement, patient safety and value-based care, enhancing trust and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. KEY POINTS: Feedback from patients and referrers, radiographers and radiology trainees, helps radiology departments to identify weaknesses and strengths, and should be fully incorporated into daily practice. Many methods are available for collecting user and stakeholder experience, and these should be implemented as a priority. Acting on stakeholder feedback can improve patient safety and patient experience ratings, leading to a culture of continuous improvement in value-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02002-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring the value that radiology brings to patient care can be challenging. A positive patient experience is consistently associated with patient safety, clinical effectiveness, and outcome measures and is therefore a tool for measuring value-based care. Monitoring the experience of users of radiology services is an indispensable component of quality improvement programmes for radiology departments. The integration of comprehensive feedback mechanisms brings numerous benefits, including enhanced care, strengthened trust, and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. Feedback should be collected from a variety of stakeholders through a 360-degree approach, combining both systematically performed structured methods, such as formal surveys, and unstructured methods, such as informal and opportunistic information gathering during multidisciplinary rounds. To maximise the impact of feedback, it should be frequent and diverse, ensuring that all perspectives are considered. Leaders in radiology must prioritise embedding a culture of feedback within their institutions, recognising its crucial role in continuous improvement. It is essential to ensure that our departments consistently provide value to our most important stakeholders-the patients-but also to our referrers and trainees. In this article, we consider methods for collecting feedback and provide some of the key findings from the literature. By fostering an environment that values and acts upon feedback, we can achieve significant advancements in patient care and overall service quality in radiology. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Regular feedback from patients, peers, radiographers, referrers, trainees and other users of imaging services is an essential tool for continuous quality improvement, patient safety and value-based care, enhancing trust and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. KEY POINTS: Feedback from patients and referrers, radiographers and radiology trainees, helps radiology departments to identify weaknesses and strengths, and should be fully incorporated into daily practice. Many methods are available for collecting user and stakeholder experience, and these should be implemented as a priority. Acting on stakeholder feedback can improve patient safety and patient experience ratings, leading to a culture of continuous improvement in value-based care.

放射学中的反馈:改善用户体验和提供基于价值的护理的基本工具。
衡量放射学给病人护理带来的价值可能具有挑战性。积极的患者体验始终与患者安全、临床有效性和结果测量相关,因此是衡量基于价值的护理的工具。监测使用者使用放射服务的经验,是提高放射科服务质素计划不可或缺的组成部分。综合反馈机制的整合带来了许多好处,包括加强关怀、加强信任以及加强与利益相关者和服务使用者的接触。应该通过360度的方法从各种利益相关者那里收集反馈,将系统执行的结构化方法(如正式调查)和非结构化方法(如在多学科轮次中非正式和机会性的信息收集)结合起来。为了最大限度地发挥反馈的影响,反馈应该频繁和多样化,确保考虑到所有的观点。放射学的领导者必须优先在他们的机构内嵌入反馈文化,认识到它在持续改进中的关键作用。确保我们的科室始终如一地为我们最重要的利益相关者——病人——提供价值,同时也为我们的转诊医生和学员提供价值,这是至关重要的。在本文中,我们考虑了收集反馈的方法,并提供了一些来自文献的关键发现。通过营造一个重视反馈并根据反馈采取行动的环境,我们可以在病人护理和放射学整体服务质量方面取得重大进展。重要相关性声明:来自患者、同行、放射技师、转诊医生、受训人员和其他影像服务用户的定期反馈是持续改进质量、患者安全和基于价值的护理、增强与利益相关者和服务用户的信任和更多参与的重要工具。关键点:来自患者和转诊者、放射技师和放射学学员的反馈,有助于放射科识别弱点和优势,并应充分纳入日常实践。有许多方法可用于收集用户和涉众的经验,这些方法应该作为优先事项来实现。根据利益相关者的反馈采取行动可以改善患者安全和患者体验评级,从而形成一种持续改进基于价值的护理的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信