Results of Chromosomal Microarray Need to Always Be Checked by (Molecular) Cytogenetics-Even If They Seem to Be Simple Deletions.

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Genes Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/genes16060714
Thomas Liehr, Sylke Singer, Ulrike Mau-Holzmann, Stefanie Kankel, Niklas Padutsch, Luisa Person, Eva Daumiller, Uwe Kornak
{"title":"Results of Chromosomal Microarray Need to Always Be Checked by (Molecular) Cytogenetics-Even If They Seem to Be Simple Deletions.","authors":"Thomas Liehr, Sylke Singer, Ulrike Mau-Holzmann, Stefanie Kankel, Niklas Padutsch, Luisa Person, Eva Daumiller, Uwe Kornak","doi":"10.3390/genes16060714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Chromosome microarrays (CMAs) tend to be used as the first line test or as a test that does not require confirmation or verification by a second test. However, to understand the implications of a duplication or deletion for a family seeking genetic counseling, it is crucial to know the nature of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. Here, we present seven cases with apparent isolated copy number loss, five of which showed unexpected complexity. <b>Methods:</b> Seven cases were investigated by CMA due to intellectual disability and/or dysmorphic features. Isolated deletions ranging in size from ~0.6 to ~21 Mb were found and referred for further characterization of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. To elucidate the cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using locus-specific, whole and partial chromosome painting and/or multicolor banding. <b>Results:</b> Among the seven selected cases, there were five with unexpected complexity. Isolated deletions were actually evidence of chromoanasynthesis, ring chromosome formation, unbalanced translocation, or unbalanced insertion. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results clearly underscore that it seems reasonable to examine every case with a copy number variant-even if it appears to be \"only\" a simple partial deletion-using banding and/or molecular cytogenetic testing in order to make a qualified assessment of the situation and, on this basis, ensure sound genetic counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":12688,"journal":{"name":"Genes","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16060714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Chromosome microarrays (CMAs) tend to be used as the first line test or as a test that does not require confirmation or verification by a second test. However, to understand the implications of a duplication or deletion for a family seeking genetic counseling, it is crucial to know the nature of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. Here, we present seven cases with apparent isolated copy number loss, five of which showed unexpected complexity. Methods: Seven cases were investigated by CMA due to intellectual disability and/or dysmorphic features. Isolated deletions ranging in size from ~0.6 to ~21 Mb were found and referred for further characterization of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. To elucidate the cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using locus-specific, whole and partial chromosome painting and/or multicolor banding. Results: Among the seven selected cases, there were five with unexpected complexity. Isolated deletions were actually evidence of chromoanasynthesis, ring chromosome formation, unbalanced translocation, or unbalanced insertion. Conclusions: These results clearly underscore that it seems reasonable to examine every case with a copy number variant-even if it appears to be "only" a simple partial deletion-using banding and/or molecular cytogenetic testing in order to make a qualified assessment of the situation and, on this basis, ensure sound genetic counseling.

染色体微阵列的结果总是需要(分子)细胞遗传学检查-即使他们似乎是简单的缺失。
背景/目的:染色体微阵列(CMAs)往往被用作第一行测试或作为不需要通过第二次测试确认或验证的测试。然而,为了理解重复或缺失对寻求遗传咨询的家庭的影响,了解潜在染色体重排的本质是至关重要的。在这里,我们提出了7例明显孤立的拷贝数丢失,其中5例表现出意想不到的复杂性。方法:对7例因智力障碍和(或)畸形特征所致的儿童进行CMA检查。发现了~0.6 ~ ~21 Mb的分离缺失,并将其用于进一步表征潜在的染色体重排。为了阐明这些病例,荧光原位杂交采用位点特异性、全染色体和部分染色体染色和/或多色带。结果:选取的7例病例中,有5例的复杂性出乎意料。分离缺失实际上是染色体合成、环状染色体形成、不平衡易位或不平衡插入的证据。结论:这些结果清楚地强调,使用带带和/或分子细胞遗传学检测来检查每一个有拷贝数变异的病例似乎是合理的,即使它看起来“只是”一个简单的部分缺失,以便对情况进行合格的评估,并在此基础上确保可靠的遗传咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genes
Genes GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1975
审稿时长
22.94 days
期刊介绍: Genes (ISSN 2073-4425) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to genes, genetics and genomics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信