To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era.

IF 6.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Sriniketh Vangaru, Debswapna Bhattacharya
{"title":"To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era.","authors":"Sriniketh Vangaru, Debswapna Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbaf297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein side-chain packing (PSCP), the problem of predicting side-chain conformations given a fixed backbone structure, has important implications in the modeling of structures and interactions. However, despite the groundbreaking progress in protein structure prediction pioneered by AlphaFold, the existing PSCP methods still rely on experimental inputs, and do not leverage AlphaFold-predicted backbone coordinates to enable PSCP at scale. Here, we perform a large-scale benchmarking of the predictive performance of various PSCP methods on public datasets from multiple rounds of the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction challenges using a diverse set of evaluation metrics. Empirical results demonstrate that the PSCP methods perform well in packing the side-chains with experimental inputs, but they fail to generalize in repacking AlphaFold-generated structures. We additionally explore the effectiveness of leveraging the self-assessment confidence scores from AlphaFold by implementing a backbone confidence-aware integrative approach. While such a protocol often leads to performance improvement by attaining modest yet statistically significant accuracy gains over the AlphaFold baseline, it does not yield consistent and pronounced improvements. Our study highlights the recent advances and remaining challenges in PSCP in the post-AlphaFold era.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein side-chain packing (PSCP), the problem of predicting side-chain conformations given a fixed backbone structure, has important implications in the modeling of structures and interactions. However, despite the groundbreaking progress in protein structure prediction pioneered by AlphaFold, the existing PSCP methods still rely on experimental inputs, and do not leverage AlphaFold-predicted backbone coordinates to enable PSCP at scale. Here, we perform a large-scale benchmarking of the predictive performance of various PSCP methods on public datasets from multiple rounds of the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction challenges using a diverse set of evaluation metrics. Empirical results demonstrate that the PSCP methods perform well in packing the side-chains with experimental inputs, but they fail to generalize in repacking AlphaFold-generated structures. We additionally explore the effectiveness of leveraging the self-assessment confidence scores from AlphaFold by implementing a backbone confidence-aware integrative approach. While such a protocol often leads to performance improvement by attaining modest yet statistically significant accuracy gains over the AlphaFold baseline, it does not yield consistent and pronounced improvements. Our study highlights the recent advances and remaining challenges in PSCP in the post-AlphaFold era.

打包还是不打包:重新审视后alphafold时代的蛋白质侧链打包。
蛋白质侧链填充(PSCP)是在固定主链结构下预测侧链构象的问题,在结构和相互作用的建模中具有重要意义。然而,尽管AlphaFold在蛋白质结构预测方面取得了突破性进展,但现有的PSCP方法仍然依赖于实验输入,并没有利用AlphaFold预测的骨干坐标来实现大规模的PSCP。在这里,我们使用一组不同的评估指标,对来自多轮结构预测关键评估挑战的公共数据集的各种PSCP方法的预测性能进行了大规模的基准测试。实验结果表明,PSCP方法在填充带有实验输入的侧链时表现良好,但在重新填充alphafold生成的结构时不能泛化。此外,我们还探讨了通过实施骨干信心感知综合方法来利用AlphaFold的自我评估信心分数的有效性。虽然这样的协议通常通过在AlphaFold基线上获得适度但统计上显着的准确性来提高性能,但它并没有产生一致和显着的改进。我们的研究强调了后alphafold时代PSCP的最新进展和仍然存在的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信