Efficacy and safety of treatments in familial Mediterranean fever and its complications: a systematic review informing the EULAR/PReS recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Erdal Sag, Teresa Otón, Loreto Carmona, Seza Ozen
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of treatments in familial Mediterranean fever and its complications: a systematic review informing the EULAR/PReS recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever.","authors":"Erdal Sag, Teresa Otón, Loreto Carmona, Seza Ozen","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse the efficacy and safety of (1) the biological agents and tofacitinib in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF); (2) the biological agents and tofacitinib in FMF patients with complications such as amyloidosis; and (3) the colchicine preparations and dosing strategies to serve as evidence supporting the updated European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review (SR) of studies testing pharmacological treatments in FMF patients, including targets, dosing, tapering, and uses in AA amyloidosis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched, focusing on studies published after October 1, 2014. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias in the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, respectively. Due to excess heterogeneity, results were synthesised qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This SR included 42 studies for efficacy and safety (n = 1798 patients), 13 for tapering, and 31 for amyloidosis. Based on 6 RCTs of interleukin (IL)-1 blockers and observational studies, these biologicals seem to be effective in decreasing the number of attacks and acute-phase reactants and improving disease activity scores and patient-reported outcomes. They also seem relatively safe. An RCT showed the equivalence of once-daily vs twice-daily doses of colchicine. The evidence of AA amyloidosis was entirely observational but reassuring for a deadly complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biological agents, particularly IL-1 inhibitors, are effective and relatively safe options for FMF patients who do not respond to colchicine. These treatments may be promising alternatives for managing symptoms and preventing comorbidities in both paediatric and adult populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse the efficacy and safety of (1) the biological agents and tofacitinib in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF); (2) the biological agents and tofacitinib in FMF patients with complications such as amyloidosis; and (3) the colchicine preparations and dosing strategies to serve as evidence supporting the updated European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations.

Methods: This was a systematic review (SR) of studies testing pharmacological treatments in FMF patients, including targets, dosing, tapering, and uses in AA amyloidosis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched, focusing on studies published after October 1, 2014. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias in the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, respectively. Due to excess heterogeneity, results were synthesised qualitatively.

Results: This SR included 42 studies for efficacy and safety (n = 1798 patients), 13 for tapering, and 31 for amyloidosis. Based on 6 RCTs of interleukin (IL)-1 blockers and observational studies, these biologicals seem to be effective in decreasing the number of attacks and acute-phase reactants and improving disease activity scores and patient-reported outcomes. They also seem relatively safe. An RCT showed the equivalence of once-daily vs twice-daily doses of colchicine. The evidence of AA amyloidosis was entirely observational but reassuring for a deadly complication.

Conclusions: Biological agents, particularly IL-1 inhibitors, are effective and relatively safe options for FMF patients who do not respond to colchicine. These treatments may be promising alternatives for managing symptoms and preventing comorbidities in both paediatric and adult populations.

家族性地中海热及其并发症治疗的有效性和安全性:为EULAR/PReS关于家族性地中海热的建议提供信息的系统综述
目的:分析(1)生物制剂与托法替尼治疗家族性地中海热(FMF)的疗效和安全性;(2)生物制剂和托法替尼在伴有淀粉样变性等并发症的FMF患者中的应用;(3)秋水仙碱制剂和给药策略作为支持更新的欧洲风湿病协会联盟(EULAR)建议的证据。方法:这是一项系统综述(SR)的研究,测试FMF患者的药物治疗,包括靶点、剂量、减量和AA淀粉样变性的使用。检索了MEDLINE, Embase和Cochrane图书馆,重点是2014年10月1日之后发表的研究。分别使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表评估纳入的随机对照试验(RCTs)和观察性研究的偏倚风险。由于异质性过大,结果是定性合成的。结果:该SR包括42项疗效和安全性研究(n = 1798例),13项锥度研究,31项淀粉样变性研究。基于6项白细胞介素(IL)-1阻滞剂的随机对照试验和观察性研究,这些生物制剂似乎在减少发作次数和急性期反应物以及改善疾病活动性评分和患者报告的结果方面有效。它们似乎也相对安全。一项随机对照试验显示,每天服用一次秋水仙碱与每天服用两次秋水仙碱效果相当。AA淀粉样变的证据完全是观察性的,但作为一种致命的并发症是令人放心的。结论:对于秋水仙碱无反应的FMF患者,生物制剂,特别是IL-1抑制剂是有效且相对安全的选择。在儿科和成人人群中,这些治疗方法可能是控制症状和预防合并症的有希望的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信