Supporting Nurses When a Patient Dies.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
American Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1097/AJN.0000000000000110
Esther Otis, Kathryn B Reid, Lauren K Sink, Patricia A Scherle, Johnsa Greene-Morris
{"title":"Supporting Nurses When a Patient Dies.","authors":"Esther Otis, Kathryn B Reid, Lauren K Sink, Patricia A Scherle, Johnsa Greene-Morris","doi":"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When a patient dies, nurses are often quickly assigned a new patient, leading to frustration due to the lack of time to complete postmortem care, care for the deceased patient's family members, or even take a short break. The trauma that nurses experience when a patient dies is underrecognized and contributes to moral distress, burnout, and thoughts of leaving the profession. To address this problem, we developed and implemented a Post-Death Care Team Protocol as a systematic approach to support nurses in the wake of a patient's death and to better support nurses' emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this program evaluation is to report early focus group and first-year survey data on the impact of the Post-Death Care Team Protocol. Creating and implementing systematic processes that support clinicians' well-being is a complex and iterative process, and this report highlights strategies for success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development and evaluation of the protocol was conducted at a medium-sized hospital in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. The hospital's staff resilience coordinator developed and implemented the protocol using input from nursing leadership and the hospital administration beginning in March 2022, after a patient's death. The protocol was specifically designed to support the nurse who was assigned to the deceased patient, including protection from immediate additions to the nurse's work assignment, time for one additional short break, and continuing workload protections for the remainder of the shift. The protocol was evaluated using an institutional review board-approved mixed-methods approach (qualitative focus group study and descriptive survey study). Two small focus groups were conducted to learn more about nurses' experiences after a patient's death and about their experiences with the protocol. Descriptive surveys were emailed to RNs who had been assigned to deceased patients at the time of their death; the nurses were asked to complete the survey within about a week after the death. Survey responses from 69 nurses who were associated with 148 patient deaths (a 46.6% response rate) were collected in the first year of protocol implementation and were used to evaluate protocol use, perceived helpfulness, and impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus group data analysis showed that nurses desire meaningful support after a patient's death, including sufficient time to complete postmortem care and process the event, a supervisor's presence to manage assignment changes, protection from the work overload associated with rapidly arriving admissions, and a reduction in uncompassionate comments from colleagues regarding these desires. Survey results showed that the Post-Death Care Team Protocol was used in 42% of patient deaths in the first year, with rich anecdotal comments highlighting both the positive benefits of using the protocol as well as negative experiences when the protocol wasn't used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both focus group and survey findings pointed to process changes that can improve workflow following a patient's death. They also highlighted an ongoing need for culture change regarding the ways in which colleagues can improve support of one another after a patient's death. The protocol addresses system improvements designed to provide meaningful support to nurses and foster institutional culture change concerning nurse well-being in one of the most heart-wrenching aspects of clinical care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"125 7","pages":"44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When a patient dies, nurses are often quickly assigned a new patient, leading to frustration due to the lack of time to complete postmortem care, care for the deceased patient's family members, or even take a short break. The trauma that nurses experience when a patient dies is underrecognized and contributes to moral distress, burnout, and thoughts of leaving the profession. To address this problem, we developed and implemented a Post-Death Care Team Protocol as a systematic approach to support nurses in the wake of a patient's death and to better support nurses' emotional well-being.

Purpose: The aim of this program evaluation is to report early focus group and first-year survey data on the impact of the Post-Death Care Team Protocol. Creating and implementing systematic processes that support clinicians' well-being is a complex and iterative process, and this report highlights strategies for success.

Methods: The development and evaluation of the protocol was conducted at a medium-sized hospital in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. The hospital's staff resilience coordinator developed and implemented the protocol using input from nursing leadership and the hospital administration beginning in March 2022, after a patient's death. The protocol was specifically designed to support the nurse who was assigned to the deceased patient, including protection from immediate additions to the nurse's work assignment, time for one additional short break, and continuing workload protections for the remainder of the shift. The protocol was evaluated using an institutional review board-approved mixed-methods approach (qualitative focus group study and descriptive survey study). Two small focus groups were conducted to learn more about nurses' experiences after a patient's death and about their experiences with the protocol. Descriptive surveys were emailed to RNs who had been assigned to deceased patients at the time of their death; the nurses were asked to complete the survey within about a week after the death. Survey responses from 69 nurses who were associated with 148 patient deaths (a 46.6% response rate) were collected in the first year of protocol implementation and were used to evaluate protocol use, perceived helpfulness, and impact.

Results: Focus group data analysis showed that nurses desire meaningful support after a patient's death, including sufficient time to complete postmortem care and process the event, a supervisor's presence to manage assignment changes, protection from the work overload associated with rapidly arriving admissions, and a reduction in uncompassionate comments from colleagues regarding these desires. Survey results showed that the Post-Death Care Team Protocol was used in 42% of patient deaths in the first year, with rich anecdotal comments highlighting both the positive benefits of using the protocol as well as negative experiences when the protocol wasn't used.

Conclusions: Both focus group and survey findings pointed to process changes that can improve workflow following a patient's death. They also highlighted an ongoing need for culture change regarding the ways in which colleagues can improve support of one another after a patient's death. The protocol addresses system improvements designed to provide meaningful support to nurses and foster institutional culture change concerning nurse well-being in one of the most heart-wrenching aspects of clinical care delivery.

在病人死亡时支持护士。
背景:当病人死亡时,护士往往很快被分配到一个新的病人,由于缺乏时间来完成尸检护理,照顾死者的家属,甚至短暂休息,导致沮丧。当病人死亡时,护士所经历的创伤没有得到充分认识,并导致道德上的痛苦、倦怠和离开这个职业的想法。为了解决这个问题,我们制定并实施了一项死亡后护理团队协议,作为一种系统的方法,在病人死亡后支持护士,并更好地支持护士的情感健康。目的:本项目评估的目的是报告早期焦点小组和第一年调查数据对死亡后护理小组协议的影响。创建和实施支持临床医生福祉的系统流程是一个复杂而反复的过程,本报告强调了成功的战略。方法:在美国中大西洋地区的一家中型医院进行了方案的制定和评估。从2022年3月开始,在一名患者死亡后,该医院的员工应变能力协调员根据护理领导和医院管理部门的意见制定并实施了该协议。该方案是专门为支持被分配到死者患者身边的护士而设计的,包括保护护士不立即增加工作任务,有额外的短暂休息时间,以及在轮班剩余时间内继续保护工作量。该方案采用机构审查委员会批准的混合方法(定性焦点小组研究和描述性调查研究)进行评估。进行了两个小型焦点小组,以更多地了解护士在病人死亡后的经历以及他们对该方案的体验。描述性调查通过电子邮件发送给在死亡患者死亡时被分配给他们的注册护士;护士被要求在病人死后一周内完成调查。在方案实施的第一年,收集了与148例患者死亡相关的69名护士的调查回复(46.6%的回复率),并用于评估方案的使用、感知的有用性和影响。结果:焦点小组数据分析显示,护士希望在病人死亡后得到有意义的支持,包括有足够的时间来完成死后护理和处理事件,有主管在场管理任务变更,避免因快速到达医院而超负荷工作,以及减少同事对这些愿望的无情评论。调查结果显示,42%的患者在第一年的死亡中使用了“死亡后护理团队协议”,其中有丰富的轶事评论,强调了使用该协议的积极益处以及未使用该协议时的负面体验。结论:焦点小组和调查结果都指出,流程变化可以改善病人死亡后的工作流程。他们还强调,在病人去世后,同事之间如何更好地相互支持方面,目前仍需要改变文化。该协议涉及系统改进,旨在为护士提供有意义的支持,并促进有关护士福祉的机构文化变革,这是临床护理交付中最令人心痛的方面之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
604
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/). AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com. AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信