Values in Lutheran Social Teaching v. Rights in Dobbs

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Mary J. Streufert
{"title":"Values in Lutheran Social Teaching v. Rights in Dobbs","authors":"Mary J. Streufert","doi":"10.1111/dial.12883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The reasoning of the court in what is called “the Dobbs decision” is rooted in rights related to the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment of the US Constitution. A problem from a Lutheran perspective is that the context for the court's majority decision about rights is rooted in a heritage of patriarchy and white supremacy. The values of patriarchy and white supremacy are hierarchy and control, particularly of bodies and reproduction. The result is that Dobbs reinforces limited moral agency and primarily prioritizes flourishing of embryos and fetuses without asking what pregnant neighbors need. The social teaching of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) stands against the Dobbs decision.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":42769,"journal":{"name":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","volume":"64 2","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dial.12883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reasoning of the court in what is called “the Dobbs decision” is rooted in rights related to the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. A problem from a Lutheran perspective is that the context for the court's majority decision about rights is rooted in a heritage of patriarchy and white supremacy. The values of patriarchy and white supremacy are hierarchy and control, particularly of bodies and reproduction. The result is that Dobbs reinforces limited moral agency and primarily prioritizes flourishing of embryos and fetuses without asking what pregnant neighbors need. The social teaching of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) stands against the Dobbs decision.

路德教会社会训导的价值观与多布斯的权利
法院在所谓的“多布斯案判决”中的推理植根于美国宪法第14修正案的相关权利。从路德教的角度来看,一个问题是,法院关于权利的多数决定的背景植根于父权制和白人至上主义的传统。父权制和白人至上主义的价值观是等级制度和控制,尤其是对身体和生殖的控制。结果是,多布斯强化了有限的道德代理,优先考虑胚胎和胎儿的繁荣,而不问怀孕的邻居需要什么。美国福音派路德教会(ELCA)的社会教义反对多布斯案的判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信