Policies and Strategies to Promote Optimal Mental Health of Australian University Students: A Document Review

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Melinda Hutchesson, Tracy Burrows, Lucy Couper, Sienna Kavalec, Alison Knapp, Zoe Harrison, Sjaan Gomersall
{"title":"Policies and Strategies to Promote Optimal Mental Health of Australian University Students: A Document Review","authors":"Melinda Hutchesson,&nbsp;Tracy Burrows,&nbsp;Lucy Couper,&nbsp;Sienna Kavalec,&nbsp;Alison Knapp,&nbsp;Zoe Harrison,&nbsp;Sjaan Gomersall","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>University students experience higher rates of poor mental health compared with the general adult population. In 2022, Orygen released the University Mental Health Framework (the Framework) to guide universities on creating mentally healthy universities. This document review assesses the extent to which Australian universities' current policies or strategies align with the Framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of all Australian universities' websites was undertaken in January 2024. Results that met the inclusion criteria had data extracted for alignment with the six principles of the Framework. The policy was scored a 0 if the principle was absent/not considered, 1 if it was partially considered, and 2 if all aspects were considered. Each policy received a total score from 0 to 12 for alignment with the Framework principles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five of the 39 Australian universities (64%) had a policy/strategy publicly available on their website focused on promoting optimal mental health of students. The mean score for alignment with the Framework principles was 3.9 ± 3.9 (Range 0–12). Principle 5, which focuses on students' access to services, was the most considered (<i>n</i> = 23, 58.9%) Principle 4, which focuses on collaborative and coordinated actions, was the least considered (<i>n</i> = 13, 33%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This document review demonstrates the considerable scope and opportunity to improve the policies and strategies currently being implemented across Australian universities to support the mental health of students. Universities and the mental health sector therefore should work collectively, alongside students, to guide mental health policy development in the university setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

University students experience higher rates of poor mental health compared with the general adult population. In 2022, Orygen released the University Mental Health Framework (the Framework) to guide universities on creating mentally healthy universities. This document review assesses the extent to which Australian universities' current policies or strategies align with the Framework.

Methods

A systematic search of all Australian universities' websites was undertaken in January 2024. Results that met the inclusion criteria had data extracted for alignment with the six principles of the Framework. The policy was scored a 0 if the principle was absent/not considered, 1 if it was partially considered, and 2 if all aspects were considered. Each policy received a total score from 0 to 12 for alignment with the Framework principles.

Results

Twenty-five of the 39 Australian universities (64%) had a policy/strategy publicly available on their website focused on promoting optimal mental health of students. The mean score for alignment with the Framework principles was 3.9 ± 3.9 (Range 0–12). Principle 5, which focuses on students' access to services, was the most considered (n = 23, 58.9%) Principle 4, which focuses on collaborative and coordinated actions, was the least considered (n = 13, 33%).

Conclusions

This document review demonstrates the considerable scope and opportunity to improve the policies and strategies currently being implemented across Australian universities to support the mental health of students. Universities and the mental health sector therefore should work collectively, alongside students, to guide mental health policy development in the university setting.

促进澳大利亚大学生最佳心理健康的政策与策略:文献综述
与普通成年人相比,大学生的心理健康状况不佳的比例更高。2022年,Orygen发布了《大学心理健康框架》(以下简称《框架》),指导大学创建心理健康大学。本文件评估了澳大利亚大学目前的政策或战略与框架的一致程度。方法于2024年1月对澳大利亚所有大学网站进行系统检索。符合纳入标准的结果提取了符合框架六项原则的数据。如果不考虑原则,该政策得0分;如果部分考虑,得1分;如果全面考虑,得2分。每个策略在与框架原则的一致性方面获得了从0到12的总分。结果39所澳大利亚大学中有25所(64%)在其网站上公开了一项政策/战略,重点是促进学生的最佳心理健康。与框架原则一致性的平均得分为3.9±3.9(范围0-12)。关注学生获得服务的原则5被考虑得最多(n = 23, 58.9%),关注协作和协调行动的原则4被考虑得最少(n = 13, 33%)。本文件审查表明,在澳大利亚各大学目前正在实施的支持学生心理健康的政策和战略方面,改进的余地和机会相当大。因此,大学和心理健康部门应与学生一起共同努力,指导大学环境中的心理健康政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信