The role of machine learning in predictive toxicology: A review of current trends and future perspectives

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Olawale M. Ajisafe , Yemi A. Adekunle , Eghosasere Egbon , Covenant Ebubechi Ogbonna , David B. Olawade
{"title":"The role of machine learning in predictive toxicology: A review of current trends and future perspectives","authors":"Olawale M. Ajisafe ,&nbsp;Yemi A. Adekunle ,&nbsp;Eghosasere Egbon ,&nbsp;Covenant Ebubechi Ogbonna ,&nbsp;David B. Olawade","doi":"10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major challenge in drug development, contributing to high attrition rates and significant financial losses. Due to species differences and limited scalability, traditional toxicity testing methods, such as in vitro assays and animal studies, often fail to predict human-specific toxicities accurately. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has introduced transformative approaches to predictive toxicology, leveraging large-scale datasets such as omics profiles, chemical properties, and electronic health records (EHRs). These AI-powered models provide early and accurate identification of toxicity risks, reducing reliance on animal testing and improving the efficiency of drug discovery. This review explores the role of AI models in predicting ADRs, emphasizing their ability to integrate diverse datasets and uncover complex toxicity mechanisms. Validation techniques, including cross-validation, external validation, and benchmarking against traditional methods, are discussed to ensure model robustness and generalizability. Furthermore, the ethical implications of AI, its alignment with the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), and its potential to address regulatory challenges are highlighted. By expediting the identification of safe drug candidates and minimizing late-stage failures, AI models significantly reduce costs and development timelines. However, challenges related to data quality, interpretability, and regulatory integration persist. Addressing these issues will enable AI to fully revolutionize predictive toxicology, ensuring safer and more effective drug development processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18122,"journal":{"name":"Life sciences","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 123821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320525004564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major challenge in drug development, contributing to high attrition rates and significant financial losses. Due to species differences and limited scalability, traditional toxicity testing methods, such as in vitro assays and animal studies, often fail to predict human-specific toxicities accurately. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has introduced transformative approaches to predictive toxicology, leveraging large-scale datasets such as omics profiles, chemical properties, and electronic health records (EHRs). These AI-powered models provide early and accurate identification of toxicity risks, reducing reliance on animal testing and improving the efficiency of drug discovery. This review explores the role of AI models in predicting ADRs, emphasizing their ability to integrate diverse datasets and uncover complex toxicity mechanisms. Validation techniques, including cross-validation, external validation, and benchmarking against traditional methods, are discussed to ensure model robustness and generalizability. Furthermore, the ethical implications of AI, its alignment with the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), and its potential to address regulatory challenges are highlighted. By expediting the identification of safe drug candidates and minimizing late-stage failures, AI models significantly reduce costs and development timelines. However, challenges related to data quality, interpretability, and regulatory integration persist. Addressing these issues will enable AI to fully revolutionize predictive toxicology, ensuring safer and more effective drug development processes.
机器学习在预测毒理学中的作用:当前趋势和未来前景的回顾
药物不良反应(adr)是药物开发中的一个主要挑战,导致高损耗率和重大经济损失。由于物种差异和有限的可扩展性,传统的毒性测试方法,如体外测定和动物研究,往往不能准确预测人类特异性毒性。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)的出现为预测毒理学引入了变革性的方法,利用大规模数据集,如组学概况、化学性质和电子健康记录(EHRs)。这些人工智能驱动的模型提供了早期和准确的毒性风险识别,减少了对动物试验的依赖,提高了药物发现的效率。这篇综述探讨了人工智能模型在预测adr中的作用,强调了它们整合不同数据集和揭示复杂毒性机制的能力。讨论了验证技术,包括交叉验证、外部验证和针对传统方法的基准测试,以确保模型的鲁棒性和泛化性。此外,还强调了人工智能的伦理影响,它与3r原则(替代、减少和改进)的一致性,以及它解决监管挑战的潜力。通过加速确定安全的候选药物并最大限度地减少后期失败,人工智能模型显着降低了成本和开发时间表。然而,与数据质量、可解释性和监管整合相关的挑战仍然存在。解决这些问题将使人工智能能够彻底改变预测毒理学,确保更安全、更有效的药物开发过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Life sciences
Life sciences 医学-药学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
841
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Life Sciences is an international journal publishing articles that emphasize the molecular, cellular, and functional basis of therapy. The journal emphasizes the understanding of mechanism that is relevant to all aspects of human disease and translation to patients. All articles are rigorously reviewed. The Journal favors publication of full-length papers where modern scientific technologies are used to explain molecular, cellular and physiological mechanisms. Articles that merely report observations are rarely accepted. Recommendations from the Declaration of Helsinki or NIH guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals must be adhered to. Articles should be written at a level accessible to readers who are non-specialists in the topic of the article themselves, but who are interested in the research. The Journal welcomes reviews on topics of wide interest to investigators in the life sciences. We particularly encourage submission of brief, focused reviews containing high-quality artwork and require the use of mechanistic summary diagrams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信