Olawale M. Ajisafe , Yemi A. Adekunle , Eghosasere Egbon , Covenant Ebubechi Ogbonna , David B. Olawade
{"title":"The role of machine learning in predictive toxicology: A review of current trends and future perspectives","authors":"Olawale M. Ajisafe , Yemi A. Adekunle , Eghosasere Egbon , Covenant Ebubechi Ogbonna , David B. Olawade","doi":"10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major challenge in drug development, contributing to high attrition rates and significant financial losses. Due to species differences and limited scalability, traditional toxicity testing methods, such as in vitro assays and animal studies, often fail to predict human-specific toxicities accurately. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has introduced transformative approaches to predictive toxicology, leveraging large-scale datasets such as omics profiles, chemical properties, and electronic health records (EHRs). These AI-powered models provide early and accurate identification of toxicity risks, reducing reliance on animal testing and improving the efficiency of drug discovery. This review explores the role of AI models in predicting ADRs, emphasizing their ability to integrate diverse datasets and uncover complex toxicity mechanisms. Validation techniques, including cross-validation, external validation, and benchmarking against traditional methods, are discussed to ensure model robustness and generalizability. Furthermore, the ethical implications of AI, its alignment with the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), and its potential to address regulatory challenges are highlighted. By expediting the identification of safe drug candidates and minimizing late-stage failures, AI models significantly reduce costs and development timelines. However, challenges related to data quality, interpretability, and regulatory integration persist. Addressing these issues will enable AI to fully revolutionize predictive toxicology, ensuring safer and more effective drug development processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18122,"journal":{"name":"Life sciences","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 123821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320525004564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major challenge in drug development, contributing to high attrition rates and significant financial losses. Due to species differences and limited scalability, traditional toxicity testing methods, such as in vitro assays and animal studies, often fail to predict human-specific toxicities accurately. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has introduced transformative approaches to predictive toxicology, leveraging large-scale datasets such as omics profiles, chemical properties, and electronic health records (EHRs). These AI-powered models provide early and accurate identification of toxicity risks, reducing reliance on animal testing and improving the efficiency of drug discovery. This review explores the role of AI models in predicting ADRs, emphasizing their ability to integrate diverse datasets and uncover complex toxicity mechanisms. Validation techniques, including cross-validation, external validation, and benchmarking against traditional methods, are discussed to ensure model robustness and generalizability. Furthermore, the ethical implications of AI, its alignment with the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), and its potential to address regulatory challenges are highlighted. By expediting the identification of safe drug candidates and minimizing late-stage failures, AI models significantly reduce costs and development timelines. However, challenges related to data quality, interpretability, and regulatory integration persist. Addressing these issues will enable AI to fully revolutionize predictive toxicology, ensuring safer and more effective drug development processes.
期刊介绍:
Life Sciences is an international journal publishing articles that emphasize the molecular, cellular, and functional basis of therapy. The journal emphasizes the understanding of mechanism that is relevant to all aspects of human disease and translation to patients. All articles are rigorously reviewed.
The Journal favors publication of full-length papers where modern scientific technologies are used to explain molecular, cellular and physiological mechanisms. Articles that merely report observations are rarely accepted. Recommendations from the Declaration of Helsinki or NIH guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals must be adhered to. Articles should be written at a level accessible to readers who are non-specialists in the topic of the article themselves, but who are interested in the research. The Journal welcomes reviews on topics of wide interest to investigators in the life sciences. We particularly encourage submission of brief, focused reviews containing high-quality artwork and require the use of mechanistic summary diagrams.