Sequential trauma indexing as universal tool for outcome prediction in patients with multiple injuries

Q2 Medicine
Rajnand Kumar , Watson Thomas , Rehan-ul-Haq , Bhaskar Sarkar , Shobha S. Arora , Souvik Paul
{"title":"Sequential trauma indexing as universal tool for outcome prediction in patients with multiple injuries","authors":"Rajnand Kumar ,&nbsp;Watson Thomas ,&nbsp;Rehan-ul-Haq ,&nbsp;Bhaskar Sarkar ,&nbsp;Shobha S. Arora ,&nbsp;Souvik Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Currently used scoring systems require complex calculation and training so it is not routinely used like GCS despite increase in trauma cases. All the scoring systems evaluate patients once initially without considering role of resuscitation. So, we propose a sequential scoring system for all levels of trauma to predict the survival outcome related to the initial injury severity and the treatment response in first 24 h of trauma by simple summation of routinely used data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted on 377 patients with acute trauma using only routinely used clinical and laboratory investigations. A total of 10 parameters were used with predetermined score allotted for each condition. The maximum possible score was 25 and minimum of 06. Low score indicated poor outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on the clinical interpretation of the data and actual clinical outcome three zone of has been designated -<ul><li><span>1.</span><span><div>Red Zone (Score 9–15) – Serious threat to survival.</div></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><div>Yellow Zone (Score 16–20) – Probable threat to survival.</div></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><div>Green Zone (Score 21–25) – Minimal or no threat to survival</div></span></li></ul></div><div>The 24-h total score was the most important predictor according to the ROC curve (AUC 0.944, p: &lt;0.0001) followed by the 6-h total score (AUC 0.904, p: &lt;0.0001) and the one-time total score (AUC: 0.713, p: &lt;0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The sequential summation of routine investigation done for multiple injured patients can give a unique tool like GCS which is universal to use and can also predict outcome. The indexing tool developed in the current study was able to predict mortality of patients with multiple injuries within 24 h following admission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225002085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Currently used scoring systems require complex calculation and training so it is not routinely used like GCS despite increase in trauma cases. All the scoring systems evaluate patients once initially without considering role of resuscitation. So, we propose a sequential scoring system for all levels of trauma to predict the survival outcome related to the initial injury severity and the treatment response in first 24 h of trauma by simple summation of routinely used data.

Methods

The study was conducted on 377 patients with acute trauma using only routinely used clinical and laboratory investigations. A total of 10 parameters were used with predetermined score allotted for each condition. The maximum possible score was 25 and minimum of 06. Low score indicated poor outcome.

Results

Based on the clinical interpretation of the data and actual clinical outcome three zone of has been designated -
  • 1.
    Red Zone (Score 9–15) – Serious threat to survival.
  • 2.
    Yellow Zone (Score 16–20) – Probable threat to survival.
  • 3.
    Green Zone (Score 21–25) – Minimal or no threat to survival
The 24-h total score was the most important predictor according to the ROC curve (AUC 0.944, p: <0.0001) followed by the 6-h total score (AUC 0.904, p: <0.0001) and the one-time total score (AUC: 0.713, p: <0.0001).

Conclusion

The sequential summation of routine investigation done for multiple injured patients can give a unique tool like GCS which is universal to use and can also predict outcome. The indexing tool developed in the current study was able to predict mortality of patients with multiple injuries within 24 h following admission.
顺序创伤索引作为预测多重损伤患者预后的通用工具
目前使用的评分系统需要复杂的计算和训练,因此尽管创伤病例有所增加,但它并不像GCS那样被常规使用。所有的评分系统最初只对患者进行一次评估,不考虑复苏的作用。因此,我们提出了一个针对所有创伤级别的顺序评分系统,通过简单汇总常规使用的数据来预测与初始损伤严重程度和创伤前24小时治疗反应相关的生存结果。方法对377例急性创伤患者进行常规临床和实验室检查。共使用10个参数,每个条件分配预定分数。最高可得25分,最低可得06分。得分低表明预后差。结果根据临床解读的数据和实际临床转归三个区分别为-1。红色区域(得分9-15)-严重威胁生存。黄色区域(得分16-20)-可能威胁到生存。根据ROC曲线(AUC 0.944, p: <0.0001), 24小时总分是最重要的预测因子,其次是6小时总分(AUC 0.904, p: <0.0001)和一次性总分(AUC: 0.713, p: <0.0001)。结论对多发损伤患者的常规调查进行序贯总结,可提供一种独特的、通用的、预测预后的工具。本研究开发的索引工具能够预测入院后24小时内多发损伤患者的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信