Weathering the Storm: The Impact of Weather Events, Lockdowns and Holidays on Oncology and General Emergency Presentations to a United Kingdom Tertiary Centre-A 7.5-year Review
M.T.K. Cheng , N. White , S. Frost , H. Attia , D.M. Favara
{"title":"Weathering the Storm: The Impact of Weather Events, Lockdowns and Holidays on Oncology and General Emergency Presentations to a United Kingdom Tertiary Centre-A 7.5-year Review","authors":"M.T.K. Cheng , N. White , S. Frost , H. Attia , D.M. Favara","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><strong>Aims</strong></h3><div>Weather extremes, public holidays and weekend effects modulate emergency department activity. Their impact on oncology-specific emergency presentations remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine how COVID-19 lockdowns, weather extremes, and calendar factors influence oncology emergency presentations versus all-cause emergency presentations at a United Kingdom tertiary academic centre.</div></div><div><h3><strong>Materials and Methods</strong></h3><div>We conducted a 7.5-year retrospective time-series analysis of daily oncology-specific and all-cause emergency presentations (1/01/2017-9/7/2024). A quasi‑Poisson distributed lag non-linear model quantified same-day and cumulative (0-21 day) effects of COVID-19 lockdowns, weather extremes (≤2.5<sup>th</sup> or ≥97.5<sup>th</sup> percentile), public holidays, and day of the week, on daily presentation rates.</div></div><div><h3><strong>Results</strong></h3><div>Of 970,884 emergencies, 27,946 (2.9%) were oncology-specific. Lockdowns reduced oncology emergencies by 11% (cumulative relative risk [RR] = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.034) and all-cause attendances by 6% (cumulative RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Both rebounded after lockdown. Oncology presentations showed no significant association with extreme cold/heat, heavy rainfall or snow, whereas all-cause attendances rose 6% in very-cold weather (cumulative RR= 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.10, <em>P</em> = 0.0009) and fell 7% in heavy rain (cumulative RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98, <em>P</em> = 0.002). Public holidays halved oncology emergencies (cumulative RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.44-0.55, <em>P</em> < 0.001) versus a 9% fall in all-cause emergencies (cumulative RR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.90-0.93; <em>P</em> < 0.0001). The Boxing Day to New Year period increased oncology emergencies by 21% (same day RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.33, <em>P</em> = 0.0002) and all-cause by 4% (cumulative RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, <em>P</em> = 0.001). Weekend volumes for oncology emergencies fell 58% (cumulative RR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.39-0.45, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), compared with a 15% decrease in all-cause emergencies (same day RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84-0.86, <em>P</em> < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><div>Oncology emergency demand was significantly influenced by calendar constraints (public holidays, weekends, lockdowns) but not by weather extremes. All-cause emergencies were influenced by both calendar and weather extremes. Calendar-based rostering of oncology staff around holiday periods and weekends may therefore yield greater benefit than weather-triggered surge plans. Validation in centres with wetter or more extreme climates is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 103879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655525001347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Weather extremes, public holidays and weekend effects modulate emergency department activity. Their impact on oncology-specific emergency presentations remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine how COVID-19 lockdowns, weather extremes, and calendar factors influence oncology emergency presentations versus all-cause emergency presentations at a United Kingdom tertiary academic centre.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a 7.5-year retrospective time-series analysis of daily oncology-specific and all-cause emergency presentations (1/01/2017-9/7/2024). A quasi‑Poisson distributed lag non-linear model quantified same-day and cumulative (0-21 day) effects of COVID-19 lockdowns, weather extremes (≤2.5th or ≥97.5th percentile), public holidays, and day of the week, on daily presentation rates.
Results
Of 970,884 emergencies, 27,946 (2.9%) were oncology-specific. Lockdowns reduced oncology emergencies by 11% (cumulative relative risk [RR] = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-0.99, P = 0.034) and all-cause attendances by 6% (cumulative RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, P < 0.0001). Both rebounded after lockdown. Oncology presentations showed no significant association with extreme cold/heat, heavy rainfall or snow, whereas all-cause attendances rose 6% in very-cold weather (cumulative RR= 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.10, P = 0.0009) and fell 7% in heavy rain (cumulative RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98, P = 0.002). Public holidays halved oncology emergencies (cumulative RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.44-0.55, P < 0.001) versus a 9% fall in all-cause emergencies (cumulative RR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.90-0.93; P < 0.0001). The Boxing Day to New Year period increased oncology emergencies by 21% (same day RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.33, P = 0.0002) and all-cause by 4% (cumulative RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P = 0.001). Weekend volumes for oncology emergencies fell 58% (cumulative RR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.39-0.45, P < 0.0001), compared with a 15% decrease in all-cause emergencies (same day RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84-0.86, P < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Oncology emergency demand was significantly influenced by calendar constraints (public holidays, weekends, lockdowns) but not by weather extremes. All-cause emergencies were influenced by both calendar and weather extremes. Calendar-based rostering of oncology staff around holiday periods and weekends may therefore yield greater benefit than weather-triggered surge plans. Validation in centres with wetter or more extreme climates is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.