{"title":"How public digital governance system affects firms' digital technology innovation performance: Base on open innovation perspective","authors":"Yang Du , Jun Xu , Xiao Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public digital governance (PDG) represents the government's capacity to leverage digital technologies in public administration. From a systems perspective, PDG encompasses four core dimensions and exhibits the distinctive characteristics of holism-emergence and independence-modularity. Drawing upon the framework of open innovation, this study investigates the key mechanisms through which PDG influences the digital technology innovation performance (DTIP) of enterprises. Utilizing a dynamic panel model based on data from Chinese provincial governments and listed firms, the paper inspects a benchmark effect and examines the transmission pathways through mediating, moderating, and threshold effect models. The empirical results reveal several findings. First, within the open innovation context, the enhancement of PDG directly improves DTIP, while the presence of CTO-equivalent positions within firms contributes to heterogeneity under the impact of PDG. Second, PDG enhances DTIP through multiple parallel mediating mechanisms, including the accumulation of information capital, the reduction of technological blockade, the promotion of knowledge integration, and the acceleration of corporate digitalization. Additionally, a chain mediating mechanism is identified, wherein PDG influences regional digital homogeneity, thereby facilitating corporate digitalization, finally impacts DTIP. Third, regional innovation and entrepreneurship activity positively moderates the relationship between PDG and DTIP, whereas corporate attention to digitalization exhibits a nonlinear threshold effect. This study conceptualizes the key dimensions of PDG from a systems theory perspective, unpacks the underlying mechanisms linking PDG to DTIP and offers valuable implications for understanding the coordinated development of public digital governance and firm innovation performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103001"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public digital governance (PDG) represents the government's capacity to leverage digital technologies in public administration. From a systems perspective, PDG encompasses four core dimensions and exhibits the distinctive characteristics of holism-emergence and independence-modularity. Drawing upon the framework of open innovation, this study investigates the key mechanisms through which PDG influences the digital technology innovation performance (DTIP) of enterprises. Utilizing a dynamic panel model based on data from Chinese provincial governments and listed firms, the paper inspects a benchmark effect and examines the transmission pathways through mediating, moderating, and threshold effect models. The empirical results reveal several findings. First, within the open innovation context, the enhancement of PDG directly improves DTIP, while the presence of CTO-equivalent positions within firms contributes to heterogeneity under the impact of PDG. Second, PDG enhances DTIP through multiple parallel mediating mechanisms, including the accumulation of information capital, the reduction of technological blockade, the promotion of knowledge integration, and the acceleration of corporate digitalization. Additionally, a chain mediating mechanism is identified, wherein PDG influences regional digital homogeneity, thereby facilitating corporate digitalization, finally impacts DTIP. Third, regional innovation and entrepreneurship activity positively moderates the relationship between PDG and DTIP, whereas corporate attention to digitalization exhibits a nonlinear threshold effect. This study conceptualizes the key dimensions of PDG from a systems theory perspective, unpacks the underlying mechanisms linking PDG to DTIP and offers valuable implications for understanding the coordinated development of public digital governance and firm innovation performance.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.