Who’s in your extended network? Analysing the size and homogeneity of acquaintanceship networks in the Netherlands

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Beate Völker , Bas Hofstra , Rense Corten , Frank van Tubergen
{"title":"Who’s in your extended network? Analysing the size and homogeneity of acquaintanceship networks in the Netherlands","authors":"Beate Völker ,&nbsp;Bas Hofstra ,&nbsp;Rense Corten ,&nbsp;Frank van Tubergen","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study advances the understanding of the size and homogeneity of personal networks, focusing on extended networks that encompass both core discussion ties and the broader array of acquaintances. While previous research has primarily examined these dimensions within small, strong-tie networks, knowledge about extended networks remains limited. Using data from the Dutch Network Size Survey (2021), a representative survey of the Dutch adult population, this study provides novel insights into the size, gender, and educational homogeneity of extended networks, as well as individual variation across these dimensions. Employing the Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) with an extensive set of scale-up items, we find a median extended network size of 446 and a mean size of 518. Substantial variation exists across individuals, with larger networks associated with being employed, having more household members, being younger, possessing greater resources (e.g., income, wealth), and attaining higher levels of education. Additionally, our findings reveal significant gender and educational segregation within extended networks. These results shed light on the structure of extended networks and highlight the social stratification of network size and homogeneity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 173-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873325000383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study advances the understanding of the size and homogeneity of personal networks, focusing on extended networks that encompass both core discussion ties and the broader array of acquaintances. While previous research has primarily examined these dimensions within small, strong-tie networks, knowledge about extended networks remains limited. Using data from the Dutch Network Size Survey (2021), a representative survey of the Dutch adult population, this study provides novel insights into the size, gender, and educational homogeneity of extended networks, as well as individual variation across these dimensions. Employing the Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) with an extensive set of scale-up items, we find a median extended network size of 446 and a mean size of 518. Substantial variation exists across individuals, with larger networks associated with being employed, having more household members, being younger, possessing greater resources (e.g., income, wealth), and attaining higher levels of education. Additionally, our findings reveal significant gender and educational segregation within extended networks. These results shed light on the structure of extended networks and highlight the social stratification of network size and homogeneity.
谁在你的扩展网络中?分析荷兰熟人网络的规模和同质性
本研究推进了对个人网络规模和同质性的理解,重点关注涵盖核心讨论关系和更广泛的熟人的扩展网络。虽然以前的研究主要是在小的、强联系的网络中检查这些维度,但对扩展网络的了解仍然有限。使用荷兰网络规模调查(2021)的数据,这是一项对荷兰成年人口的代表性调查,本研究为扩展网络的规模、性别和教育同质性以及这些维度上的个体差异提供了新的见解。采用网络放大方法(NSUM)和一组广泛的放大项目,我们发现中位数扩展网络大小为446,平均大小为518。个体之间存在着实质性的差异,更大的网络与就业、拥有更多家庭成员、更年轻、拥有更多资源(如收入、财富)和获得更高水平的教育有关。此外,我们的研究结果揭示了在扩展的网络中存在显著的性别和教育隔离。这些结果揭示了扩展网络的结构,并突出了网络规模和同质性的社会分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信