Hui-Lan Chang , Kang-Yi Su , Steven D. Goodman , Yung-Chu Chuang , Shen-Jyue Hsu , Yi-Kai Fang , Hsiao-Pei Yu , Cheng-Hao Fang , Ya-Chien Yang , Sui-Yuan Chang , Woei-horng Fang
{"title":"Proofreading of mismatches within primer-template junctions by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I in vitro and in vivo","authors":"Hui-Lan Chang , Kang-Yi Su , Steven D. Goodman , Yung-Chu Chuang , Shen-Jyue Hsu , Yi-Kai Fang , Hsiao-Pei Yu , Cheng-Hao Fang , Ya-Chien Yang , Sui-Yuan Chang , Woei-horng Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.dnarep.2025.103864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Escherichia coli</em> DNA polymerase I (Pol I) possesses a 3’ to 5’ proofreading function. Using a non-inhibitory <em>in vitro</em> proofreading assay and MALDI-TOF MS analysis, we demonstrated the Pol I proofreading function was effective at removal of mismatches within the primer-template junction. Mismatches of 1–4 nucleotides (nt) from the primer 3′ end could be completely or partially corrected, with no additional editing observed further upstream. A backward movement mechanism was proposed involving distributive backtracking of polymerase along the template to remove non-fully complemented primers in order for DNA synthesis to recover. Co-editing DNA substrates containing two mismatches, one at 1–4-nt of the primer 3’ end and the other outside of normal proofreading range, confirmed our distributive backtracking hypothesis. Additionally, a time course analysis revealed proofreading of internal mismatches was a non-processive reaction. To further confirm the validity of our proofreading model, we used <em>in vivo</em>, phagemid-derived nicked C-C substrates. Transformation results were consistent with the notion that mismatches located less than 4-nt upstream of the 3′ end could be successfully proofread. <em>In vivo</em> proofreading of double mismatches also supports our model of polymerase backtracking for internal mismatch editing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":300,"journal":{"name":"DNA Repair","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 103864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786425000606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Pol I) possesses a 3’ to 5’ proofreading function. Using a non-inhibitory in vitro proofreading assay and MALDI-TOF MS analysis, we demonstrated the Pol I proofreading function was effective at removal of mismatches within the primer-template junction. Mismatches of 1–4 nucleotides (nt) from the primer 3′ end could be completely or partially corrected, with no additional editing observed further upstream. A backward movement mechanism was proposed involving distributive backtracking of polymerase along the template to remove non-fully complemented primers in order for DNA synthesis to recover. Co-editing DNA substrates containing two mismatches, one at 1–4-nt of the primer 3’ end and the other outside of normal proofreading range, confirmed our distributive backtracking hypothesis. Additionally, a time course analysis revealed proofreading of internal mismatches was a non-processive reaction. To further confirm the validity of our proofreading model, we used in vivo, phagemid-derived nicked C-C substrates. Transformation results were consistent with the notion that mismatches located less than 4-nt upstream of the 3′ end could be successfully proofread. In vivo proofreading of double mismatches also supports our model of polymerase backtracking for internal mismatch editing.
期刊介绍:
DNA Repair provides a forum for the comprehensive coverage of DNA repair and cellular responses to DNA damage. The journal publishes original observations on genetic, cellular, biochemical, structural and molecular aspects of DNA repair, mutagenesis, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and other biological responses in cells exposed to genomic insult, as well as their relationship to human disease.
DNA Repair publishes full-length research articles, brief reports on research, and reviews. The journal welcomes articles describing databases, methods and new technologies supporting research on DNA repair and responses to DNA damage. Letters to the Editor, hot topics and classics in DNA repair, historical reflections, book reviews and meeting reports also will be considered for publication.