Effects of Consolidation Stress and Chemical Compatibility on Contaminant Transport Through Soil‐Bentonite Cutoff Walls

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Lin‐Feng Cao, Bo Huang, Yu‐Chao Li
{"title":"Effects of Consolidation Stress and Chemical Compatibility on Contaminant Transport Through Soil‐Bentonite Cutoff Walls","authors":"Lin‐Feng Cao, Bo Huang, Yu‐Chao Li","doi":"10.1002/nag.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The soil‐bentonite (SB) cutoff wall is commonly utilized at contaminated sites to delay the contaminant transport. Current research typically assumes that their transport parameters are constant, ignoring the non‐uniform distribution of these parameters with depth caused by consolidation stress, and performance degradation due to contaminants (i.e., chemical compatibility). A two‐dimensional contaminant transport model was developed in an SB wall system, for the first time, simultaneously considering consolidation stress and chemical compatibility. A computational framework was established to obtain the numerical solution, which was then compared with analytical solutions and centrifuge tests to verify its effectiveness. Subsequently, existing models were compared, and the impact of relevant parameters on SB wall performance was analyzed. The results indicate that neglecting consolidation stress and chemical compatibility can overestimate SB wall performance, with a maximum overestimation of 139.76% for breakthrough time and a maximum underestimation of 96.25% for total flux. The spatial distribution of contaminant source and concentrations of Na<jats:sup>+</jats:sup> and Ca<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> significantly impact the breakthrough time. Additionally, the bentonite content should be increased on the original standard to compensate for performance declines caused by contaminants. The thickness and position design should consider contaminant source in the shallow part, and choose a more economical combination. The proposed model can provide more comprehensive and accurate guidance for SB wall construction.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The soil‐bentonite (SB) cutoff wall is commonly utilized at contaminated sites to delay the contaminant transport. Current research typically assumes that their transport parameters are constant, ignoring the non‐uniform distribution of these parameters with depth caused by consolidation stress, and performance degradation due to contaminants (i.e., chemical compatibility). A two‐dimensional contaminant transport model was developed in an SB wall system, for the first time, simultaneously considering consolidation stress and chemical compatibility. A computational framework was established to obtain the numerical solution, which was then compared with analytical solutions and centrifuge tests to verify its effectiveness. Subsequently, existing models were compared, and the impact of relevant parameters on SB wall performance was analyzed. The results indicate that neglecting consolidation stress and chemical compatibility can overestimate SB wall performance, with a maximum overestimation of 139.76% for breakthrough time and a maximum underestimation of 96.25% for total flux. The spatial distribution of contaminant source and concentrations of Na+ and Ca2+ significantly impact the breakthrough time. Additionally, the bentonite content should be increased on the original standard to compensate for performance declines caused by contaminants. The thickness and position design should consider contaminant source in the shallow part, and choose a more economical combination. The proposed model can provide more comprehensive and accurate guidance for SB wall construction.
固结应力和化学相容性对土壤-膨润土截流墙中污染物运移的影响
土壤-膨润土(SB)防渗墙通常用于污染场地,以延缓污染物的迁移。目前的研究通常假设它们的输运参数是恒定的,忽略了固结应力引起的这些参数随深度的不均匀分布,以及污染物(即化学相容性)导致的性能退化。首次在SB壁体系中建立了同时考虑固结应力和化学相容性的二维污染物输运模型。建立了数值解的计算框架,并与解析解和离心实验进行了比较,验证了数值解的有效性。随后,对现有模型进行了比较,并分析了相关参数对SB墙性能的影响。结果表明,忽略固结应力和化学相容性会高估固相墙的性能,突破时间最大高估139.76%,总通量最大低估96.25%。污染源的空间分布和Na+、Ca2+浓度对突破时间有显著影响。此外,膨润土的含量应在原来的标准上增加,以弥补污染物造成的性能下降。厚度和位置设计应考虑较浅部分的污染源,选择较经济的组合。所提出的模型可以为SB墙的施工提供更全面、准确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信