{"title":"Effects of Consolidation Stress and Chemical Compatibility on Contaminant Transport Through Soil‐Bentonite Cutoff Walls","authors":"Lin‐Feng Cao, Bo Huang, Yu‐Chao Li","doi":"10.1002/nag.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The soil‐bentonite (SB) cutoff wall is commonly utilized at contaminated sites to delay the contaminant transport. Current research typically assumes that their transport parameters are constant, ignoring the non‐uniform distribution of these parameters with depth caused by consolidation stress, and performance degradation due to contaminants (i.e., chemical compatibility). A two‐dimensional contaminant transport model was developed in an SB wall system, for the first time, simultaneously considering consolidation stress and chemical compatibility. A computational framework was established to obtain the numerical solution, which was then compared with analytical solutions and centrifuge tests to verify its effectiveness. Subsequently, existing models were compared, and the impact of relevant parameters on SB wall performance was analyzed. The results indicate that neglecting consolidation stress and chemical compatibility can overestimate SB wall performance, with a maximum overestimation of 139.76% for breakthrough time and a maximum underestimation of 96.25% for total flux. The spatial distribution of contaminant source and concentrations of Na<jats:sup>+</jats:sup> and Ca<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> significantly impact the breakthrough time. Additionally, the bentonite content should be increased on the original standard to compensate for performance declines caused by contaminants. The thickness and position design should consider contaminant source in the shallow part, and choose a more economical combination. The proposed model can provide more comprehensive and accurate guidance for SB wall construction.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The soil‐bentonite (SB) cutoff wall is commonly utilized at contaminated sites to delay the contaminant transport. Current research typically assumes that their transport parameters are constant, ignoring the non‐uniform distribution of these parameters with depth caused by consolidation stress, and performance degradation due to contaminants (i.e., chemical compatibility). A two‐dimensional contaminant transport model was developed in an SB wall system, for the first time, simultaneously considering consolidation stress and chemical compatibility. A computational framework was established to obtain the numerical solution, which was then compared with analytical solutions and centrifuge tests to verify its effectiveness. Subsequently, existing models were compared, and the impact of relevant parameters on SB wall performance was analyzed. The results indicate that neglecting consolidation stress and chemical compatibility can overestimate SB wall performance, with a maximum overestimation of 139.76% for breakthrough time and a maximum underestimation of 96.25% for total flux. The spatial distribution of contaminant source and concentrations of Na+ and Ca2+ significantly impact the breakthrough time. Additionally, the bentonite content should be increased on the original standard to compensate for performance declines caused by contaminants. The thickness and position design should consider contaminant source in the shallow part, and choose a more economical combination. The proposed model can provide more comprehensive and accurate guidance for SB wall construction.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.