High Failure Rates of Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary and Secondary OA.

Moritz Kraus,Asimina Lazaridou,Mara Warnhoff,Johanna Illner,Moritz Brunner,Tim Schneller,Markus Scheibel
{"title":"High Failure Rates of Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary and Secondary OA.","authors":"Moritz Kraus,Asimina Lazaridou,Mara Warnhoff,Johanna Illner,Moritz Brunner,Tim Schneller,Markus Scheibel","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nGlenoid component loosening remains a challenge in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The aims of this study were to evaluate complications, implant survival, and revision rates in patients with primary and secondary osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing stemless aTSA using the Arthrex Eclipse humeral implant with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component and to identify risk factors leading to revision.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nOf 211 patients who underwent primary stemless aTSA (using the Eclipse humeral component with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid) with prospectively documented data in a local registry, 197 were evaluated, grouped by OA pathology (primary OA, 153 patients; secondary OA, 44 patients). Demographic and functional data (e.g., age, sex, shoulder function) and the cause of OA were documented preoperatively in both groups. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess complications and implant revisions between the study groups. In addition, various radiographic parameters (e.g., glenoid morphology, critical shoulder angle, lateral acromion index, implant sizing [humeral component overhang], radial matching of the humeral and glenoid components, glenohumeral distance, and medial glenoid cement penetration) were evaluated to explore their potential association with revision. A subset of these parameters was subsequently included in the multivariable Cox model on the basis of clinical relevance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAfter a median postoperative period of 72 months, the overall revision rate was 51%. The reasons for revision were glenoid component loosening (85%), periprosthetic humeral fracture (9%), early rotator cuff failure (3%), and low-grade infection (3%). The median implant survival in patients with primary OA (95 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 84 to 108) was significantly longer than that in patients with secondary OA (71 months; 95% CI: 60 to 88; p = 0.027). Female patients had a significantly shorter time to revision than male patients (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in complications or revision rates by OA pathology. Secondary OA, the presence of medial glenoid cement penetration, and an anterior overhang of the humeral component were associated with an increased risk of revision.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur findings indicate a high rate of glenoid component loosening as the primary cause of revision in patients with primary and secondary OA undergoing stemless aTSA with the Eclipse and a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component. This outcome emphasizes the need for careful consideration of implant design, patient selection criteria, and implant positioning and cementation in order to optimize implant survival.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Glenoid component loosening remains a challenge in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The aims of this study were to evaluate complications, implant survival, and revision rates in patients with primary and secondary osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing stemless aTSA using the Arthrex Eclipse humeral implant with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component and to identify risk factors leading to revision. METHODS Of 211 patients who underwent primary stemless aTSA (using the Eclipse humeral component with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid) with prospectively documented data in a local registry, 197 were evaluated, grouped by OA pathology (primary OA, 153 patients; secondary OA, 44 patients). Demographic and functional data (e.g., age, sex, shoulder function) and the cause of OA were documented preoperatively in both groups. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess complications and implant revisions between the study groups. In addition, various radiographic parameters (e.g., glenoid morphology, critical shoulder angle, lateral acromion index, implant sizing [humeral component overhang], radial matching of the humeral and glenoid components, glenohumeral distance, and medial glenoid cement penetration) were evaluated to explore their potential association with revision. A subset of these parameters was subsequently included in the multivariable Cox model on the basis of clinical relevance. RESULTS After a median postoperative period of 72 months, the overall revision rate was 51%. The reasons for revision were glenoid component loosening (85%), periprosthetic humeral fracture (9%), early rotator cuff failure (3%), and low-grade infection (3%). The median implant survival in patients with primary OA (95 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 84 to 108) was significantly longer than that in patients with secondary OA (71 months; 95% CI: 60 to 88; p = 0.027). Female patients had a significantly shorter time to revision than male patients (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in complications or revision rates by OA pathology. Secondary OA, the presence of medial glenoid cement penetration, and an anterior overhang of the humeral component were associated with an increased risk of revision. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate a high rate of glenoid component loosening as the primary cause of revision in patients with primary and secondary OA undergoing stemless aTSA with the Eclipse and a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component. This outcome emphasizes the need for careful consideration of implant design, patient selection criteria, and implant positioning and cementation in order to optimize implant survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
无柄解剖全肩关节置换术治疗原发性和继发性骨关节炎的聚乙烯关节盂假体失败率高。
背景:肩关节假体松动在解剖性全肩关节置换术(aTSA)中仍然是一个挑战。本研究的目的是评估原发性和继发性骨关节炎(OA)患者使用骨水泥固定全聚乙烯关节盂组件的Arthrex Eclipse肱骨种植体进行无茎aTSA的并发症、种植体存活率和翻修率,并确定导致翻修的危险因素。方法:211例接受原发性无茎aTSA(使用Eclipse肱骨假体和骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯肩关节)的患者,并在当地登记前瞻性记录数据,其中197例进行评估,按OA病理分组(原发性OA, 153例;继发性OA 44例)。术前记录两组患者的人口学和功能数据(如年龄、性别、肩关节功能)以及骨性关节炎的病因。进行比较分析,以评估研究组之间的并发症和种植体修复。此外,我们还评估了各种影像学参数(如肩关节形态、临界肩角、外侧肩峰指数、植入物尺寸[肱骨外伸]、肱骨和肩关节外伸的径向匹配、肩关节距离和内侧肩关节骨水泥穿透),以探讨它们与翻修术的潜在关联。这些参数的子集随后根据临床相关性纳入多变量Cox模型。结果中位术后72个月,总翻修率为51%。翻修手术的原因包括肩关节部件松动(85%)、肱骨假体周围骨折(9%)、早期肩袖失效(3%)和轻度感染(3%)。原发性OA患者种植体的中位生存期(95个月;95%可信区间[CI]: 84 ~ 108)明显长于继发性OA患者(71个月;95% CI: 60 ~ 88;P = 0.027)。女性患者到翻修的时间明显短于男性患者(p = 0.016)。骨性关节炎的并发症和翻修率无显著差异。继发性骨关节炎、内侧盂骨水泥穿透和肱骨前悬垂与翻修风险增加相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在原发性和继发性OA患者中,肩关节组件松动率高是进行无茎aTSA并使用Eclipse和全聚乙烯肩关节组件进行骨水泥固定的主要原因。这一结果强调需要仔细考虑种植体设计、患者选择标准、种植体定位和骨水泥,以优化种植体存活。证据水平:治疗性三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信