Rethinking Ameloblastic Fibroma and Fibro-odontoma: A Serie of 6 Cases and Reclassification Proposal.

Jonas Ver Berne, Reinhilde Jacobs, Esther Hauben
{"title":"Rethinking Ameloblastic Fibroma and Fibro-odontoma: A Serie of 6 Cases and Reclassification Proposal.","authors":"Jonas Ver Berne, Reinhilde Jacobs, Esther Hauben","doi":"10.1007/s12105-025-01818-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The classification of mixed odontogenic tumors-specifically ameloblastic fibroma (AF), ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO), and odontoma-remains controversial. The current WHO classification emphasizes the presence of dental hard tissues but overlooks the distinction between aberrant inductive activity and maturation resembling normal odontogenesis. This has led to diagnostic ambiguity and inconsistent management strategies. This study aims to propose a biologically grounded reclassification based on histological, developmental, and molecular criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a conceptual reassessment of AF, AFO, and odontoma, using six cases from our pathology archives. Histological slides were reviewed with focus on the type and organization of mineralized tissue (tubular dentin, osteodentine, enamel) and its epithelial-mesenchymal context. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated, and BRAF V600E mutation status was retrieved when available. A targeted literature review was performed to integrate findings on histology, genetic alterations, and malignant transformation risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two distinct lesion types were identified: (1) Ameloblastic fibroma with aberrant inductive activity, showing irregular osteodentine and enameloid deposits without odontoblast differentiation, harboring BRAF mutations; and (2) odontomas, characterized by mature tubular dentin and enamel formation, indicating a hamartomatous nature, despite significant clinical growth. Historical descriptions support this biological dichotomy, emphasizing the difference between aberrant inductive activity and processes resembling normal odontogenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose abandoning AFO as a distinct diagnostic entity. Instead, lesions could be classified based on the presence of organized, mature dental hard tissues. AF with aberrant inductive activity represents a benign neoplasm with low malignant potential, while odontoma is a hamartomatous lesion sometimes with large growth capacity but no malignant risk. This binary classification would align histological criteria with biological behavior, integrate molecular data, and restore diagnostic clarity. The validity of this framework should be investigated in future cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520636,"journal":{"name":"Head and neck pathology","volume":"19 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and neck pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-025-01818-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The classification of mixed odontogenic tumors-specifically ameloblastic fibroma (AF), ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO), and odontoma-remains controversial. The current WHO classification emphasizes the presence of dental hard tissues but overlooks the distinction between aberrant inductive activity and maturation resembling normal odontogenesis. This has led to diagnostic ambiguity and inconsistent management strategies. This study aims to propose a biologically grounded reclassification based on histological, developmental, and molecular criteria.

Methods: We conducted a conceptual reassessment of AF, AFO, and odontoma, using six cases from our pathology archives. Histological slides were reviewed with focus on the type and organization of mineralized tissue (tubular dentin, osteodentine, enamel) and its epithelial-mesenchymal context. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated, and BRAF V600E mutation status was retrieved when available. A targeted literature review was performed to integrate findings on histology, genetic alterations, and malignant transformation risk.

Results: Two distinct lesion types were identified: (1) Ameloblastic fibroma with aberrant inductive activity, showing irregular osteodentine and enameloid deposits without odontoblast differentiation, harboring BRAF mutations; and (2) odontomas, characterized by mature tubular dentin and enamel formation, indicating a hamartomatous nature, despite significant clinical growth. Historical descriptions support this biological dichotomy, emphasizing the difference between aberrant inductive activity and processes resembling normal odontogenesis.

Conclusion: We propose abandoning AFO as a distinct diagnostic entity. Instead, lesions could be classified based on the presence of organized, mature dental hard tissues. AF with aberrant inductive activity represents a benign neoplasm with low malignant potential, while odontoma is a hamartomatous lesion sometimes with large growth capacity but no malignant risk. This binary classification would align histological criteria with biological behavior, integrate molecular data, and restore diagnostic clarity. The validity of this framework should be investigated in future cohorts.

对成釉性纤维瘤和纤维性牙瘤6例的再思考及重新分类建议。
目的:混合牙源性肿瘤的分类-特别是成釉细胞纤维瘤(AF),成釉细胞纤维-牙瘤(AFO)和牙瘤-仍然存在争议。目前世界卫生组织的分类强调了牙齿硬组织的存在,但忽视了异常诱导活动和类似正常牙形成的成熟之间的区别。这导致了诊断的模糊性和不一致的管理策略。本研究旨在提出基于组织学、发育和分子标准的生物学基础重新分类。方法:我们从我们的病理档案中收集了6例病例,对AF、AFO和牙瘤进行了概念上的重新评估。我们回顾了组织学切片,重点介绍了矿化组织(管状牙本质、骨牙本质、牙釉质)的类型和组织及其上皮间质背景。评估临床和放射学数据,并在可用时检索BRAF V600E突变状态。我们进行了一项有针对性的文献综述,以整合组织学、遗传改变和恶性转化风险的研究结果。结果:发现两种不同的病变类型:(1)诱导活性异常的成釉细胞纤维瘤,表现为不规则的骨牙本质和搪瓷样沉积,无成牙细胞分化,含有BRAF突变;(2)牙瘤,以成熟的管状牙本质和牙釉质形成为特征,尽管临床生长明显,但具有错构瘤的性质。历史描述支持这种生物学二分法,强调异常诱导活动和类似正常牙形成过程之间的差异。结论:我们建议放弃AFO作为一个独特的诊断实体。相反,病变可以根据有组织的、成熟的牙硬组织的存在来分类。心房颤动具有异常诱导活性,是一种低恶性潜能的良性肿瘤,而齿瘤是一种错构瘤病变,有时生长能力大,但无恶性风险。这种二元分类将使组织学标准与生物学行为相一致,整合分子数据,并恢复诊断的清晰度。该框架的有效性应在未来的队列中进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信