Robert J Rushakoff, Esther Rov-Ikpah, Gwendolyn Lee, Paras B Mehta, Craig San Luis, Craig Johnson, Suneil Koliwad, Cynthia Fenton, Michael A Kohn
{"title":"Novel Inpatient Automated Self-Adjusting Subcutaneous Insulin Algorithm: Three-Year Experience. An observational study.","authors":"Robert J Rushakoff, Esther Rov-Ikpah, Gwendolyn Lee, Paras B Mehta, Craig San Luis, Craig Johnson, Suneil Koliwad, Cynthia Fenton, Michael A Kohn","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Achieving inpatient glycemic control in patients who are nil per os (NPO), on enteral tube feeds (TF), or total parental nutrition (TPN) remains extremely challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if, for inpatients with hyperglycemia who are NPO, on TF, or on TPN, an automated self-adjusting subcutaneous rapid acting insulin algorithm (SQIA) we developed and programmed into the EMR leads to improvements in glucose control compared to conventional insulin treatment (CI).Design/Intervention/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study using EMR data from 9/3/2020 to 9/2/2023, of all adult inpatients, comparing point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements between patients on SQIA versus CI and either NPO, or on TF, or on TPN. The analysis looked at the proportion of q4 hour POC glucose levels in the following ranges: hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), in range (71-180 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (181-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5,031 intervals (associated with 4310 hospitalizations) in which the patient was NPO or on TF or TPN and on the SQIA (73.5%) or CI (26.5%). The proportion of glucose values in the hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic ranges were significantly lower in the SQIA group vs. the CI group (hypoglycemia: 0.65% vs. 1.10%; difference -0.45%; -0.62 to -0.28%; p < 0.001; hyperglycemia: 5.40% vs. 6.65%; difference -1.25%; -2.03% to -0.46%; p = 0.002). With glucocorticoids, rates of severe hyperglycemia were lower for patients on the SQIA, particularly those receiving high-dose glucocorticoids (11.1% lower).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients had a lower proportion of both hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic measurements when their blood glucose levels were managed using the SQIA than when managed using conventional physician-driven insulin orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Achieving inpatient glycemic control in patients who are nil per os (NPO), on enteral tube feeds (TF), or total parental nutrition (TPN) remains extremely challenging.
Objective: To determine if, for inpatients with hyperglycemia who are NPO, on TF, or on TPN, an automated self-adjusting subcutaneous rapid acting insulin algorithm (SQIA) we developed and programmed into the EMR leads to improvements in glucose control compared to conventional insulin treatment (CI).Design/Intervention/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study using EMR data from 9/3/2020 to 9/2/2023, of all adult inpatients, comparing point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements between patients on SQIA versus CI and either NPO, or on TF, or on TPN. The analysis looked at the proportion of q4 hour POC glucose levels in the following ranges: hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), in range (71-180 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (181-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL).
Results: There were 5,031 intervals (associated with 4310 hospitalizations) in which the patient was NPO or on TF or TPN and on the SQIA (73.5%) or CI (26.5%). The proportion of glucose values in the hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic ranges were significantly lower in the SQIA group vs. the CI group (hypoglycemia: 0.65% vs. 1.10%; difference -0.45%; -0.62 to -0.28%; p < 0.001; hyperglycemia: 5.40% vs. 6.65%; difference -1.25%; -2.03% to -0.46%; p = 0.002). With glucocorticoids, rates of severe hyperglycemia were lower for patients on the SQIA, particularly those receiving high-dose glucocorticoids (11.1% lower).
Conclusions: Patients had a lower proportion of both hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic measurements when their blood glucose levels were managed using the SQIA than when managed using conventional physician-driven insulin orders.