Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197
Makram Baaklini, Maria Del C Valdés Hernández
{"title":"Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results.","authors":"Makram Baaklini, Maria Del C Valdés Hernández","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Segmentation of ischaemic stroke lesions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) remains a challenging task mainly due to the confounding appearance of these lesions with other pathologies, and variations in their presentation depending on the lesion stage (i.e., hyper-acute, acute, subacute and chronic). Works on the theme have been reviewed, but none of the reviews have addressed the seminal question on what would be the optimal architecture to address this challenge. We systematically reviewed the literature (2015-2023) for deep learning algorithms that segment acute and/or subacute stroke lesions on brain MRI seeking to address this question, meta-analysed the data extracted, and evaluated the results.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Our review, registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023481551), involved a systematic search from January 2015 to December 2023 in the following databases: IEE Explore, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, and OpenReview.net. We extracted sample characteristics, stroke stage, imaging protocols, and algorithms, and meta-analysed the data extracted. We assessed the risk of bias using NIH's study quality assessment tool, and finally, evaluated our results using data from the ISLES-2015-SISS dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1485 papers, 41 were ultimately retained. 13/41 studies incorporated attention mechanisms in their architecture, and 39/41 studies used the Dice Similarity Coefficient to assess algorithm performance. The generalisability of the algorithms reviewed was generally below par. In our pilot analysis, the UResNet50 configuration, which was developed based on the most comprehensive architectural components identified from the reviewed studies, demonstrated a better segmentation performance than the attention-based AG-UResNet50.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence that favours using attention mechanisms in deep learning architectures for acute stroke lesion segmentation on MRI data, and the use of a U-Net configuration with residual connections seems to be the most appropriate configuration for this task.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481551, PROSPERO CRD42023481551.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1491197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Segmentation of ischaemic stroke lesions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) remains a challenging task mainly due to the confounding appearance of these lesions with other pathologies, and variations in their presentation depending on the lesion stage (i.e., hyper-acute, acute, subacute and chronic). Works on the theme have been reviewed, but none of the reviews have addressed the seminal question on what would be the optimal architecture to address this challenge. We systematically reviewed the literature (2015-2023) for deep learning algorithms that segment acute and/or subacute stroke lesions on brain MRI seeking to address this question, meta-analysed the data extracted, and evaluated the results.

Methods and materials: Our review, registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023481551), involved a systematic search from January 2015 to December 2023 in the following databases: IEE Explore, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, and OpenReview.net. We extracted sample characteristics, stroke stage, imaging protocols, and algorithms, and meta-analysed the data extracted. We assessed the risk of bias using NIH's study quality assessment tool, and finally, evaluated our results using data from the ISLES-2015-SISS dataset.

Results: From 1485 papers, 41 were ultimately retained. 13/41 studies incorporated attention mechanisms in their architecture, and 39/41 studies used the Dice Similarity Coefficient to assess algorithm performance. The generalisability of the algorithms reviewed was generally below par. In our pilot analysis, the UResNet50 configuration, which was developed based on the most comprehensive architectural components identified from the reviewed studies, demonstrated a better segmentation performance than the attention-based AG-UResNet50.

Conclusion: We found no evidence that favours using attention mechanisms in deep learning architectures for acute stroke lesion segmentation on MRI data, and the use of a U-Net configuration with residual connections seems to be the most appropriate configuration for this task.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481551, PROSPERO CRD42023481551.

基于mri的急性和亚急性缺血性脑卒中病变分割的深度学习-关键结果的系统回顾,荟萃分析和试点评估。
背景:从磁共振图像(MRI)中分割缺血性脑卒中病变仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,主要是因为这些病变与其他病理相混淆,并且其表现随病变阶段(即超急性、急性、亚急性和慢性)而变化。关于这个主题的工作已经被审查过了,但是没有一个审查解决了解决这个挑战的最优架构的根本性问题。为了解决这一问题,我们系统地回顾了2015-2023年关于深度学习算法的文献(通过脑MRI对急性和/或亚急性中风病变进行分割),对提取的数据进行了meta分析,并对结果进行了评估。方法和材料:我们的综述注册在PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023481551),涉及2015年1月至2023年12月在以下数据库中的系统检索:IEE Explore、MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、PubMed、施普林格和OpenReview.net。我们提取了样本特征、脑卒中分期、成像方案和算法,并对提取的数据进行了meta分析。我们使用NIH的研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,最后使用ISLES-2015-SISS数据集的数据评估我们的结果。结果:1485篇论文中,最终保留41篇。13/41的研究将注意力机制纳入其架构,39/41的研究使用骰子相似系数来评估算法性能。所审查算法的通用性通常低于标准。在我们的试点分析中,UResNet50配置是基于从所审查的研究中确定的最全面的架构组件开发的,显示出比基于注意力的AG-UResNet50更好的分割性能。结论:我们没有发现证据表明在深度学习架构中使用注意机制对MRI数据进行急性卒中病变分割,使用带有残余连接的U-Net配置似乎是该任务最合适的配置。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481551, PROSPERO CRD42023481551。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信