The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.

Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1177/17455057251348986
Genevieve Edwards, Leesa Hooker, Kristina Edvardsson
{"title":"The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.","authors":"Genevieve Edwards, Leesa Hooker, Kristina Edvardsson","doi":"10.1177/17455057251348986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Almost half of all pregnancies worldwide and 34% of pregnancies in high-income countries are considered unintended. Several studies from high-income countries report that women from rural areas are more likely to continue their unintended pregnancy and give birth, while urban women are more likely to have an induced abortion. To explore how rurality influences women's decision making and pregnancy choices following unintended pregnancy by examining the global trends for women who reside in rural areas of high-income countries. This study is a systematic review of qualitative, cross-sectional and mixed-methods studies. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, published from January 2000 through to March 2024, retrieved from five databases: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed. Restrictions were applied to obtain original research that has been undertaken in high-income countries. The review included studies featuring participants that were either rural women who experience an unintended pregnancy or health care professionals providing direct care to rural women. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Several factors that influenced rural women's decision making following an unintended pregnancy were identified: access to abortion services; role of health care professionals; temporal factors; social norms and stigma; social factors and determinants; culture, ethnicity and religion; reproductive coercion and abortion legislation. The Social-Ecological Model highlighted the levels of interaction, the role health care professionals, family members and the wider community in supporting or obstructing rural women's decision making. Rural women's pregnancy decision making and reproductive autonomy can be compromised by intimate partners, family members, health professionals and rural culture. Health professionals have a pivotal role in supporting and respecting rural women's decision making when seeking an abortion and ensuring that rural women have timely access to abortion care. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42023409917.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251348986"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251348986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almost half of all pregnancies worldwide and 34% of pregnancies in high-income countries are considered unintended. Several studies from high-income countries report that women from rural areas are more likely to continue their unintended pregnancy and give birth, while urban women are more likely to have an induced abortion. To explore how rurality influences women's decision making and pregnancy choices following unintended pregnancy by examining the global trends for women who reside in rural areas of high-income countries. This study is a systematic review of qualitative, cross-sectional and mixed-methods studies. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, published from January 2000 through to March 2024, retrieved from five databases: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed. Restrictions were applied to obtain original research that has been undertaken in high-income countries. The review included studies featuring participants that were either rural women who experience an unintended pregnancy or health care professionals providing direct care to rural women. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Several factors that influenced rural women's decision making following an unintended pregnancy were identified: access to abortion services; role of health care professionals; temporal factors; social norms and stigma; social factors and determinants; culture, ethnicity and religion; reproductive coercion and abortion legislation. The Social-Ecological Model highlighted the levels of interaction, the role health care professionals, family members and the wider community in supporting or obstructing rural women's decision making. Rural women's pregnancy decision making and reproductive autonomy can be compromised by intimate partners, family members, health professionals and rural culture. Health professionals have a pivotal role in supporting and respecting rural women's decision making when seeking an abortion and ensuring that rural women have timely access to abortion care. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42023409917.

农村因素对意外怀孕后妇女决策和妊娠选择的影响:系统综述。
全世界几乎一半的怀孕和高收入国家34%的怀孕被认为是意外怀孕。来自高收入国家的几项研究报告称,农村地区的妇女更有可能继续意外怀孕并分娩,而城市妇女更有可能进行人工流产。通过研究高收入国家农村地区妇女的全球趋势,探讨农村因素如何影响妇女在意外怀孕后的决策和怀孕选择。本研究是对定性、横断面和混合方法研究的系统回顾。从2000年1月到2024年3月发表的同行评议文献的系统综述,检索自五个数据库:CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO和PubMed。对获得在高收入国家进行的原始研究施加了限制。这项审查包括的研究的参与者要么是意外怀孕的农村妇女,要么是为农村妇女提供直接护理的保健专业人员。19项研究符合纳入标准,纳入本综述。确定了影响农村妇女意外怀孕后决策的几个因素:获得堕胎服务;保健专业人员的作用;时间因素;社会规范和耻辱;社会因素和决定因素;文化、种族和宗教;生殖强迫和堕胎立法。社会-生态模式强调了相互作用的程度、保健专业人员、家庭成员和更广泛的社区在支持或阻碍农村妇女决策方面的作用。农村妇女的怀孕决策和生殖自主权可能受到亲密伴侣、家庭成员、保健专业人员和农村文化的影响。保健专业人员在支持和尊重农村妇女寻求堕胎的决策以及确保农村妇女及时获得堕胎护理方面发挥着关键作用。注册号:PROSPERO CRD 42023409917。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信