Local variation in musculoskeletal pain consultation rates in primary care: findings from an ecologic study in Staffordshire.

George M Peat, Jonathan C Hill, Dahai Yu, Simon Wathall, Emma Parry, James Bailey, Kay Stevenson, Clare Thompson, Ross Wilkie, Krysia Dziedzic, Kelvin P Jordan
{"title":"Local variation in musculoskeletal pain consultation rates in primary care: findings from an ecologic study in Staffordshire.","authors":"George M Peat, Jonathan C Hill, Dahai Yu, Simon Wathall, Emma Parry, James Bailey, Kay Stevenson, Clare Thompson, Ross Wilkie, Krysia Dziedzic, Kelvin P Jordan","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625100133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variation between general practices in the rate of consultations for musculoskeletal pain conditions may signal important differences in access to primary care, perceived usefulness, or available alternative sources of care; however, it might also just reflect differences in underlying 'need' between practices' registered populations. In a study of 30 general practices in Staffordshire, we calculated the proportion of adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition, then examined this in relation to selected practice and population characteristics, including the estimated prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal problems and chronic pain in each practices' registered population. Between September 2021 and July 2022, 18,388 adults were consulted for a musculoskeletal pain condition. After controlling for length of recruitment, time of year, and age-sex structure, the proportion consulting varied up to two-fold between practices but was not strongly associated with the prevalence of self-reported long-term musculoskeletal problems, chronic pain, and high-impact chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variation between general practices in the rate of consultations for musculoskeletal pain conditions may signal important differences in access to primary care, perceived usefulness, or available alternative sources of care; however, it might also just reflect differences in underlying 'need' between practices' registered populations. In a study of 30 general practices in Staffordshire, we calculated the proportion of adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition, then examined this in relation to selected practice and population characteristics, including the estimated prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal problems and chronic pain in each practices' registered population. Between September 2021 and July 2022, 18,388 adults were consulted for a musculoskeletal pain condition. After controlling for length of recruitment, time of year, and age-sex structure, the proportion consulting varied up to two-fold between practices but was not strongly associated with the prevalence of self-reported long-term musculoskeletal problems, chronic pain, and high-impact chronic pain.

初级保健中肌肉骨骼疼痛咨询率的局部差异:来自斯塔福德郡生态学研究的结果。
不同全科医生对肌肉骨骼疼痛病症的问诊率的差异可能表明在获得初级保健、感知有用性或可用的替代护理来源方面存在重要差异;然而,它也可能只是反映了不同实践的登记人口之间潜在“需求”的差异。在一项对斯塔福德郡30家全科诊所的研究中,我们计算了成年人咨询肌肉骨骼疼痛状况的比例,然后将其与选定的诊所和人群特征相关联,包括在每个诊所登记的人群中自我报告的肌肉骨骼问题和慢性疼痛的估计患病率进行了检查。在2021年9月至2022年7月期间,有18388名成年人因肌肉骨骼疼痛状况接受了咨询。在控制了招募时间、一年中的时间和年龄性别结构之后,咨询的比例在不同的实践中变化了两倍,但与自我报告的长期肌肉骨骼问题、慢性疼痛和高影响性慢性疼痛的患病率没有很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信