Understanding How Surgeons Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Doris Goubran, Iresha Ratnayake, Pamela Hebbard, Caroline Park, Maziar Fazel Darbandi, Kathleen Decker, Megan Delisle
{"title":"Understanding How Surgeons Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.","authors":"Doris Goubran, Iresha Ratnayake, Pamela Hebbard, Caroline Park, Maziar Fazel Darbandi, Kathleen Decker, Megan Delisle","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how surgeons improve the quality of breast cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2007 and 2021, breast cancer surgeons in Manitoba, Canada, participated in national initiatives to build a local capacity for quality improvement (QI) in cancer surgery. Key aspects of these initiatives include audit and feedback reports using data from synoptic operative reports and communities of practice. Surgeon engagement in breast cancer surgery QI in Manitoba has not been evaluated since the initiatives were concluded in 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 60-minute virtual semi-structured qualitative interviews with surgeons who performed breast cancer surgery in Manitoba, Canada, between 2021 and 2024. The interviews were guided by the theoretical domain framework. The thematic analyses were performed by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve surgeons were interviewed. Surgeons were motivated to ensure timely care close to home, with excellent oncological, surgical, and aesthetic outcomes. They felt capable of monitoring and improving their surgical quality by tracking their own metrics, collaborating with multidisciplinary colleagues, engaging in continuous professional development, and advocating for improvement. Audit and feedback reports were not perceived to improve the quality of surgery. They felt limited opportunities to sustain improvement strategies. Resource constraints and leadership support within the healthcare system were major barriers to achieving their ideal quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons performing breast cancer surgery in Manitoba were motivated and capable of improving the quality of breast cancer surgery. However, they perceive limited opportunities and barriers within the healthcare systems to doing so. Future research will provide information on broader contextual factors affecting breast cancer surgery QI.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 2","pages":"e585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand how surgeons improve the quality of breast cancer surgery.

Background: Between 2007 and 2021, breast cancer surgeons in Manitoba, Canada, participated in national initiatives to build a local capacity for quality improvement (QI) in cancer surgery. Key aspects of these initiatives include audit and feedback reports using data from synoptic operative reports and communities of practice. Surgeon engagement in breast cancer surgery QI in Manitoba has not been evaluated since the initiatives were concluded in 2021.

Methods: We conducted 60-minute virtual semi-structured qualitative interviews with surgeons who performed breast cancer surgery in Manitoba, Canada, between 2021 and 2024. The interviews were guided by the theoretical domain framework. The thematic analyses were performed by 2 independent researchers.

Results: Twelve surgeons were interviewed. Surgeons were motivated to ensure timely care close to home, with excellent oncological, surgical, and aesthetic outcomes. They felt capable of monitoring and improving their surgical quality by tracking their own metrics, collaborating with multidisciplinary colleagues, engaging in continuous professional development, and advocating for improvement. Audit and feedback reports were not perceived to improve the quality of surgery. They felt limited opportunities to sustain improvement strategies. Resource constraints and leadership support within the healthcare system were major barriers to achieving their ideal quality of care.

Conclusion: Surgeons performing breast cancer surgery in Manitoba were motivated and capable of improving the quality of breast cancer surgery. However, they perceive limited opportunities and barriers within the healthcare systems to doing so. Future research will provide information on broader contextual factors affecting breast cancer surgery QI.

了解外科医生如何使用理论域框架提高乳腺癌手术质量。
目的:了解外科医生如何提高乳腺癌手术质量。背景:2007年至2021年间,加拿大马尼托巴省的乳腺癌外科医生参与了国家倡议,以建立当地癌症手术质量改进(QI)的能力。这些举措的关键方面包括使用概要操作报告和实践社区数据的审计和反馈报告。自2021年倡议结束以来,曼尼托巴省乳腺癌手术QI的外科医生参与情况尚未进行评估。方法:我们对2021年至2024年间在加拿大马尼托巴进行乳腺癌手术的外科医生进行了60分钟的虚拟半结构化定性访谈。访谈以理论领域框架为指导。专题分析由2名独立研究人员进行。结果:对12名外科医生进行了访谈。外科医生的动机是确保及时的护理就近在家,具有良好的肿瘤,手术和美容效果。他们觉得自己有能力通过跟踪自己的指标、与多学科同事合作、参与持续的专业发展和倡导改进来监测和提高手术质量。审计和反馈报告并不能提高手术质量。他们感到维持改进策略的机会有限。医疗保健系统内的资源限制和领导支持是实现理想护理质量的主要障碍。结论:在马尼托巴省进行乳腺癌手术的外科医生有动力并且有能力提高乳腺癌手术的质量。然而,他们认为在医疗保健系统内这样做的机会和障碍有限。未来的研究将提供影响乳腺癌手术QI的更广泛的背景因素的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信